This paper vies pfepared for preeentatiin at the SPE/lME NmIh Sympoaum on lmProvwJ OilReUIVWY held in Tul~, oklah~a, U.S.A., 17-~A@ 1T his peper was eekcted for Pmsentetion by en SPE Program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the euthorts). Contents of the paper, ee presented, have not been reviewed by tfw Socii of Petroleum Engineere end are subject to correction by the author(s). The materiel, as preeented, does nOt n eceswiiy reflect anY P@tin of the society of Petroleum Engitwers, M offkwe, of member% Papem prmemfed et SPE meetlnge em subject to publication review by Edltofiel Commhtees of the Scciety of Petmfeum EngineW8. Permission 10copy is restrictedto en abstract of not mcfe than 300 words, IllustretiormITMYnc4be copkd. The atmtmcl shoutdcontain ccmspkucus acknowledgment of wfmre end by whom the paper is presented. Write Lbr.srian, SF'E. P.O. Box -, Rich-d-m~7~1 U.S.A., Telex 16SS4S SPEUT.
Tlua paper wu prepared for~semauon aI tic I Y% SPE Europmn PeLIokumCunf.mence kld in Milm, IIIIY. 22-24 I!'w4w 1996. This paper was selecld lor presentatco by tfw SPE Program Ccmmitle.s fdwq _ C4rnfcmmaticm ccmtamed in an abslracl sumnmed by tfw author(s). Ombmts ot Iheã s presentd. fwa not km rwiewed W the SIXiaty of Petroleum Engiwws ard am Wbfectto KJlrq,h~lfw Wllhor(s) Th e material, as presented, dces nol -b rdlect any psttm o It!+ %xiety of Petroleum EIWJimeIS o, its members. Papers Fesenled al SPE meetmgs are su to puhkaticm review by Edttonal Committee al tie Scci* of Petro!e.Im~eers %Lsti to copf IS r.astccted m an abstract of rot more !han X0 wcrds. Ilustratlcos may not by coped. TM abstract sfwukl amtarn R%H'%15%%%!?&Rkhmc15cm, TX7508S+Y3S6 "s.faxol.,,'+w?-,.ts, mt d nbem ar!d by Acw the FE$B! was presented WMe Abstract This paper givesa critical overview of field experience with the use of foam for improved sweep efficiency and control of produced gas in the Former Soviet Union, i n the North Sea and in North America. The field practice demonstrates a wide specter of foam application and reservoir problems which the foam processes-can mitigate.Foam applications are classified as injector and producer treatments for gas and water shut-off. Foam was applied in combination with different recovery strategies such as gas and WAG injection, steam injection, in-situ combustion and waterflooding. The choice of foamer and foam placement strategy are important and depend on the reservoir and type of the problem to address. Many technical failures are explainable by erroneous problem definition.The novelty of the present overview is that it gives a comparison of foam applications in three different geographical areas with different field histories, constraints and requirements on production handling facilities. The review of foam applications in the Former Soviet Union covers field applications of foam in Russia, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. The paper also discusses interesting field examples, previously unpublished with application of new foam processes including polymer enhanced foam and foam treatment for water diversion and shut-off.
Water alternate gas (WAG) injection technology is a method which may improve oil recovery efficiency by combining effects from two traditional technologies -water and gas flooding. Both microscopic oil displacement and sweep efficiency can be improved by WAG implementation. This paper describes a method of designing an effective waterlgas flooding in stratified reservoirs.The analytical approach taking into account effects of three phase flow, gravity and viscous forces in anisotropic media, allows the determination of optimum parameters of waterlgas injection. A three-phase extended black oil simulator with relative permeability and capillary pressure hysteresis, was used to validate the optimum WAG injection parameters obtained by the analytical method. In this work, the efficiency of different injection schemes was compared. Simulation results which demonstrate the influence of WAG injection parameters, as water-gas ratio, injection rates and cycle periods, on the recovery process, are discussed.
Cyclic injection is a process that improves waterflooding efficiency in heterogeneous reservoirs. The concept of cyclic injection is based on (1) pulsed injection and (2) alternating waterflood patterns. Cyclic injection has been successfully applied in a number of sandstone and carbonate oil fields in Russia. In the rest of the world, pulsed injection has had limited application, and only in naturally fractured reservoirs. Although changing the waterflood patterns is a common approach to deal with increasing water cuts, a more systematic approach with both pulsed injection and alternating flow directions is not.Cyclic injection has the greatest potential for improved recovery in heterogeneous, high-permeability-contrast sandstones and in naturally fractured carbonates and dolomites. The efficiency of the process is high in preferentially water-wet rocks saturated with compressible fluids. Capillary pressures and relative permeability effects are responsible for the improved cyclic oil displacement at the micro level. Improved sweep of the less permeable layers in communication with more permeable thief zones, better horizontal sweep achieved by changing waterflood patterns, and alternating the dominance between gravity and viscous forces are the key effects of cyclic injection on the macro level.The potential of cyclic injection at the Lower Tilje/Åre formations of the Heidrun Field in the Norwegian Sea has been evaluated. Some of the reservoir levels are highly heterogeneous, with large permeability contrasts vertically and horizontally. The current drainage strategy for these formations is water injection, with gas lift in producers when needed. Cyclic injection will improve waterflooding efficiency at virtually zero additional cost. Improved sweep, accelerated oil production, and reduced water cut are the main positive effects expected from cyclic waterflooding. The reserves are predicted to increase by 5 to 6% from the targeted reservoirs at Heidrun after 10 years of cyclic waterflooding.
The cyclic injection process to improve water flooding in carbonate reservoir was evaluated in laboratory experiments, as well as analytical and numerical simulations. Laboratory cyclic injection experiments were performed on a carbonate rock sample with an artificial horizontal fissure. Live oil was established by in-situ recombination of dead oil with hydrocarbon gas at reservoir temperature and bubble point pressure. The experiments were designed by numerical simulation of the cyclic process. Analytical modelling was done to evaluate cyclic injection sensitivity to critical reservoir and process parameters. The cyclic water injection experiments above oil bubble point pressure increased oil recovery by additional 2.9% of Oil Originally In Place (OOIP) above ordinary water flood. This effect can be attributed to the hasten imbibition of water into the matrix during pressurisation half-cycles and capillary retained water in the fine pores in the matrix resulting in oil counter current flow from matrix to the fracture during de-pressurisation half-cycles. Cyclic injection below bubble point pressure, designed to ensure gas saturation not exceeding the critical level, yielded additional recovery of 5.9% of OOIP. This effect may be credited to the energy of released gas, expelling the matrix oil into the fracture. The experimental results indicate significant potential of cyclic injection to improve micro level displacement efficiency of waterflood in carbonate reservoirs. If cyclic water injection is applied at field scale, sweep efficiency improvement from flow pattern redistribution could make an additional contribution. This has been reported by several field cases in the US, China and Former Soviet Union (FSU). Introduction The concept of cyclic injection is based on (1) pulsed injection and (2) alternating waterflood patterns [1–4]. Cyclic injection appears to have the greatest potential in heterogeneous, permeability-contrast reservoirs, with light, high compressibility fluids. Cyclic or pressure pulsing injection has been successfully applied in a number of sandstone and fractured carbonate oil fields in Russia, USA and China [1, 5–8]. Reduction of water production and acceleration of oil extraction rates were observed at several field applications. In the cyclic process, water injection rates are changed between high and low values, in a periodic fashion. The cycle periods at field scale are typically in the range of days to months, much different from the known pulsed pressure technique, where several pressure pulses are applied in time intervals of minutes. Laboratory and field applications of cyclic water injection indicate that additional oil recoveries in the range of 2–15% can be achieved with significant reduction in water cut levels, making the process very attractive and profitable [13,14,15].
The Foam Assisted WAG (FAWAG) has been a large-scale demonstration of foam for gas mobility control. Foam has been applied at the Snorre, North Sea Brent-type sandstone reservoir, for different purposes. First initiated as a gas shut-off production well treatment, thereafter as two large-scale gas mobility control processes. Combined water and gas injection (WAG) is the main oil recovery method at the Snorre field. Early gas breakthrough in some production wells has limited the oil production. Gas production control is one of the major reservoir management challenges on Snorre. Foam for mobility control has the potential to improve gas sweep in the Snorre WAG process. Results from the last trial on the Western fault block were very conclusive. Gas breakthrough was delayed, but equally important the Gas-Oil-Ratio (GOR) was considerable lower than gas injection cycles prior to the foam treatment. The paper summarizes all the foam field trails at the Snorre field, with emphasis on interpretation of the last foam application on the Western fault block. The Snorre FAWAG is the world's largest application of foam in the oil industry. The logistics involved transport of 2000 tons of chemicals from central Europe to the field location. The application of FAWAG has qualified foam as a gas mobility agent for North Sea reservoirs. Large volumes of gas have been stored in the reservoir. The expenses for FAWAG on Western Fault block (WFB) was 1M USD, and additional oil recovery value was ~ 25–40M USD at current oil prices. Introduction Foam is applied for gas shut-off and to improve of sweep efficiency during gas injection. The experience with foam in the North Sea involves foam for mobility control and production well treatments1,2. Table 1 gives a summary of the tests performed. The production well treatments have varying degree of success, reducing production GOR for weeks up to more than 6 months. The best GOR reduction has been observed in a gas coning situation3. The foam tests on Snorre are summarized in Figure 1. The Snorre oil field is located in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. The reservoir is a massive fluvial deposit within rotated fault blocks4. The reservoir pressure is 300 bars and the formation temperature is 90°C. The FAWAG (Foam Assisted Water-Alternating-Gas) project has been a full-scale field demonstration of the use of foam to improve gas sweep efficiency during WAG injection, partly funded by the European Commission's Thermie program. The project was initially started in 1997 on the central fault block (CFB) of the Snorre field. During planning of the test valuable experience had been gained during the production well treatment as mentioned and also injection tests in P25A. The pilot area had a downdip WAG injection from the injection well P25A towards the producer P18. This is the largest ever foam application in any oil field, injecting a total of ~ 2000 tons of commercial grade surfactant and consisted of two injectivity tests and two full-scale treatments. Results Production well treatment In mid-1996 a foam treatment was performed on production well P18 located in the Central Fault Block of the Snorre Field. The P18 well had suffered high GOR due to premature gas breakthrough. The purpose of the field pilot was to reduce the production GOR in P18. The surfactant used in the foam treatment was a C14/16 commercial grade alphaolefin sulfonate. Production well treatment In mid-1996 a foam treatment was performed on production well P18 located in the Central Fault Block of the Snorre Field. The P18 well had suffered high GOR due to premature gas breakthrough. The purpose of the field pilot was to reduce the production GOR in P18. The surfactant used in the foam treatment was a C14/16 commercial grade alphaolefin sulfonate.
This p aper w as selected for presentation by the Steering Committee, following revi ew of lnform a tion contained in en abstract submitted by the author(s). The paper, as presented hes not been reviewed by the Steering Committee .
The oil industry relies heavily on predictions of the recovery processes in order to make sound operational decisions for reservoir exploitation. For planning of IOR applications, one would like to predict the performance of several competing strategies before making a decision. The main tool for performing such prediction is the reservoir simulator. The reservoir simulatorsrequire extensive information about the reservoir that may not be available or can be unreliable in the initial evaluation stage, andare quite computer intensive programs. Very often decisions on recovery strategies should be taken in an early stage of field development planning. A reliable first order screening evaluation tool enables the makimg of critical decisions on potential recovery strategies with the limited reservoir information. A multicriterion model based, on the method of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and interval theory, has been applied to the assessment and screening of EOR/IOR processes, such as water and gas shut off methods. An assessment relies on the existing industry experience and field practice at different reservoir conditions. It is based on applicable ranges for key reservoir parameters (permeability, porosity, depth, fluid properties, heterogeneity, rock type, salinity, etc.). Historic data are used for ANN training by Back Propagation (BP) and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) algorithms. The ANN model permits an integration of different types of data, eliminates arbitrary approach in making decisions, and provides fast computation and accuracy. The developed ANN model is capable of assessing the efficiency of a large number of EOR/IOR and well shut-off methods even when key reservoir parameters are defective or noisy. IOR Screening Today the reservoir simulator is the main tool for predicting the performance of oil recovery strategies. In order to establish a simulation model of the field a comprehensive description of the reservoir and fluids is required. Full field simulations are also time and compute intensive programs. In situations where available reservoir information is limited and fast evaluation of reservoir strategies is needed a pre-simulation screening tool can be very useful and assist in providing assessment of recovery strategies and IOR methods. Applicability of IOR methods and recovery strategies at different reservoir conditions can be assessed based on the existing field experience and IOR knowledge [1]. The multicriterion approach, based on the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and interval theory, can be used to establish models for fast IOR applicability evaluation. Provided the expert system is populated with reliable information, the ANN tool facilitates quantified assessments of IOR methods efficiency at different reservoir conditions. ANN ANN is an information-processing system that has certain performance characteristics in common with biological neural networks. A neural network is characterized byits pattern of connections between the neurons, i.e. the network architecture,its method of determining the weights on the connections, i.e. the training (or learning) algorithm,its activation function. ANNs have been developed as generalizations of mathematical methods of human cognition or neural biology, based on the following assumptions:Information processing occurs at many simple elements called neurons.Signals are passed between neurons over connection links.Each connection link has an associated weight, which, in a typical neural net, amplifies the signal transmitted.Each neuron applies an activation function to its net input to determine its output signal.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.