Objective: Pheochromocytoma (PHEO) may occur in 0.1-5.7% of patients presenting with a neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Current recommendations are to explore only symptomatic patients. The objective of the study is to evaluate the prevalence and the interest of a systematic PHEO screening in this population. Design: A prospective study in a French tertiary center including consecutive NF1 patients older than 18 years. Methods: A systematic screening combining abdominal imaging and urinary fractionated metanephrines was proposed. In case of positivity of one or both exams, 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy or [ 18 F]-fluoro-dihydroxyphenylalanine PET imaging was performed. The diagnosis of secreting PHEO was retained in case of elevated urinary metanephrines associated with positive scintigraphy and non-secreting PHEO when urinary metanephrines were normal with a positive scintigraphy. Results: Between January 2014 and August 2015, 234 patients were included and 156 patients (66.7%) completed both exams. In these 156 patients, 12 PHEOs were diagnosed, representing a prevalence of 7.7%. Of these, six PHEOs were secreting, with only two symptomatic patients. The tumor size of these PHEOs were bigger than that of non-secreting PHEO (25.2 ± 6.6 vs 14 ± 6.9 mm, P = 0.0165). One lesion was bilateral. Mean metanephrine and normetanephrine levels were 3.2 ± 2.6 N and 2.8 ± 1 N respectively. Three patients underwent surgery. The six patients with non-secreting PHEO were asymptomatic. One of them had bilateral lesion and one underwent surgery. Conclusions: PHEO in NF1, whether or not secreting, are mostly asymptomatic. The current strategy to explore only symptomatic patients leads to an underestimation of prevalence with the risks inherent to the existence of an unrecognized PHEO.

CGM-adapted insulin regimen improves glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemic events in hemodialyzed diabetic patients. CGM could be a useful tool for the management of insulin therapy in these patients. These results need to be confirmed by long-term studies with larger sample sizes.

We sought to investigate the impact of dialysis on glucose profiles of diabetic patients using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The study included 33 hemodialyzed patients with diabetes (14 females and 19 males; mean age: 66±8 years; patients with type 2 diabetes: 30; mean duration of dialysis: 3.8±2.6 years) who were under insulin treatment. After a run-in period, CGM was performed for 48 h, including a dialysis session. Three CGM sessions were proposed for each patient over a 3-month period. CGM results were analyzed during and after dialysis at 6 different time points. Moreover, data were analyzed in 7 different day periods according to meals. Of the 99 CGM available, 21 were excluded because of technical issues or patient refusal. The CGM results indicated that mean glucose values (7.5±2.5 mmol/l vs. 9.4±1.9 mmol/l; p<0.001) and variability indices (p<0.001) were lower, whereas the frequency of hypoglycemia (4.4±9.6% vs. 2.1±7.9%; p<0.001) was higher during hemodialysis sessions. Significant differences were observed in glucose values only before and 2 h after breakfast (p<0.001). Compared with other day periods, glucose values were lower during the second half of the night and higher before and after dinner (p<0.001). In summary, CGM allows the identification of a particular glucose profile in hemodialyzed diabetic patients. CGM seems feasible and clinically useful for the analysis of glucose profiles in this group of patients.

No abstract