This study shows that SIT with a SQ-standardized HDM extract is safe. An ICS sparing effect was evident in patients with moderate persistent asthma.

BackgroundSpecific immunotherapy is the only treatment with the potential to prevent progression of the allergic disease and the potential to cure patients. The immunomodulatory ability of SQ-standardized house dust mite (HDM) subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) was investigated in patients with allergic asthma.MethodsFifty-four adults with HDM-allergic asthma were randomized 1 : 1 to receive SQ-standardized HDM SCIT (ALK) or placebo for 3 years. At baseline, and after 1, 2 and 3 years of treatment, the lowest possible inhaled corticosteroid dose required to maintain asthma control was determined, followed by determinations of nonspecific and HDM-allergen-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness, late asthmatic reaction (LAR), immediate and late-phase skin reactions, and immunological response.ResultsSQ-standardized HDM SCIT provided a statistically significantly higher HDM-allergen tolerance (P < 0.05 vs placebo) in terms of a 1.6-fold increase in PD20 (HDM-allergen inhalation challenge), a 60-fold increase in skin test histamine equivalent HDM-allergen concentrations, reduced immediate- and reduced or abolished late-phase skin reactions, as well as fewer patients with LAR. PD20 (methacholine inhalation challenge) increased initially and was similar between groups. House dust mite SCIT induced an initial increase in serum HDM-allergen-specific IgE (P = 0.028 vs placebo), which then declined to baseline value. House dust mite SCIT induced an increase in components blocking IgE binding to allergen [ΔIgE-blocking factor: 0.31; 95% CI of (0.26; 0.37)] after 1 year that remained constant after 2 and 3 years (P < 0.0001 vs placebo).ConclusionSQ-standardized HDM SCIT induced a consistent immunomodulatory effect in adults with HDM-allergic asthma; the humoral immune response was changed and the HDM-allergen tolerance in lung and skin increased.

This study was conducted to investigate the effects on the pharmacokinetics of tiagabine at steady state when coadministered with therapeutic doses of erythromycin. Tiagabine doses of 4 mg twice daily and erythromycin doses of 500 mg twice daily were administered for 4 days in an open-label, crossover, two-period interaction trial in 13 healthy volunteers. No statistically significant differences in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC tau), or half-life (t1/2) of tiagabine were observed when tiagabine was administered alone or in combination with erythromycin. A statistically significant treatment effect was observed for time to maximum concentration (tmax; 0.72 after tiagabine alone versus 0.56 hours after administration with erythromycin). No statistically significant differences were seen between men and women except in tmax and t1/2; these differences were thought to be of no clinical significance. The decrease in tmax seen in women in this study is interpreted as a differential effect of erythromycin on gastric emptying of females and not as an interaction between tiagabine and erythromycin. No changes in laboratory parameters or vital signs were attributable to trial medication. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events that were possibly related to trial medication were central nervous system effects (e.g., headache, dizziness); all adverse events were transient, the majority were rated mild in severity, and did not require additional action. Coadministration of erythromycin in healthy subjects does not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tiagabine at the doses tested.

No abstract

No abstract