1998
DOI: 10.1177/009127009803801110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Tiagabine and Erythromycin

Abstract: This study was conducted to investigate the effects on the pharmacokinetics of tiagabine at steady state when coadministered with therapeutic doses of erythromycin. Tiagabine doses of 4 mg twice daily and erythromycin doses of 500 mg twice daily were administered for 4 days in an open-label, crossover, two-period interaction trial in 13 healthy volunteers. No statistically significant differences in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC tau), or half-life (t1/2) of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, several studies found that ERY exhibited no effect on the co-administered agents oxcarbazepine [227], phenytoine [228], or tiagabin [229]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, several studies found that ERY exhibited no effect on the co-administered agents oxcarbazepine [227], phenytoine [228], or tiagabin [229]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients should be closely monitored and the CBZ dosage adjusted if necessary. Two small studies of healthy volunteers demon-strated that the second-generation AEDs, OXC and TGB, were not affected by coadministration with erythromycin (139,140).…”
Section: Antibioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author has come across one such case with severe CNS toxicity induced by an interaction between erythromycin and valproate. Oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, felbamate, topiramate, and levetiracetam appear not to be affected by the concomitant administration of erythromycin (Keranen et al, 1992; Thomsen et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%