PSA-based screening reduced the rate of death from prostate cancer by 20% but was associated with a high risk of overdiagnosis. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN49127736.)
Background
The European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) is a randomized multi-center trial with a predefined centralized database, analysis plan and core age group (55–69 years) evaluating prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in eight European countries.
Methods
The present results are based on prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality truncated at 9, 11, and 13 years of follow-up in the intervention arm (offered PSA testing) relative to the control arm. A secondary analysis corrected for selection bias due to non-participation was performed. Because of incomplete follow-up, only incidence and no mortality data at 9 years follow-up are reported for the French centers.
Findings
The rate ratio (RR) of PCa incidence between the intervention and control arms was 1.91 after 9 years (1.64 including France), 1.66 after 11 years and 1.57 after 13 years. The RR of PCa mortality was 0.85, 0.78 and 0.79 at 9, 11 and 13 years respectively (95% confidence interval 13-year 0.69–0.91, p = 0.001). This corresponds to a relative risk reduction of 21% and an absolute risk reduction of death from PCa at 13 years of 0.11 per 1,000 person-years or 1.28 per 1,000 men randomized, which is equivalent to one PCa death averted per 781 men invited for screening or one per 27 additional PCa detected. PCa mortality reduction in screened men after adjustment for non–participation was 27%.
Interpretation
This update of ERSPC confirms a substantial PCa mortality reduction due to PSA testing, with a substantially increased absolute effect at 13 years compared to findings after 9 and 11 years.
Funding
All sources of funding per center are indicated in the “Web extra material” section.
Trial identification
This trial is registered under Current Controlled Trials number: ISRCTN49127736.
Summary
Background
Several trials have evaluated the effect of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening on prostate cancer (PC) mortality, with conflicting results. We report on the mortality in the European Randomized Trial of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) with two added years of follow-up.
Methods
The ERSPC is a randomized screening trial in men aged 50 – 74 years (N=182,160) at entry, with a predefined core age group of 55 – 69 years (N=162,388) conducted in eight European countries Men randomized to the intervention arm were offered prostate specific antigen (PSA)-based screening while those in the control arm were not offered screening. The primary outcome is PC mortality.
Results
After a median follow-up of 11 years the relative risk reduction for PC death in the intention to screen analysis was 21% (risk ratio 0.79, 95%CI 0.68 – 0.91, p=0.001), and 29% for screened men after correction for non-compliance in the core age group. The absolute difference in mortality amounted to 0.10 per 1000 person years or 1.07 per 1000 men randomized. The rate ratio of PC mortality during the follow-up years 10 -11 was 0.62 (95% CI 0.45 – 0.85, P=0.003). The numbers needed invite (NNI) and detect (NND) to prevent one PC death amounted to 1055 and 37 at 11 years of follow-up and 936 and 33 for the entire follow-up. There was no difference in all-cause mortality.
Conclusions
Two added years of follow-up consolidate our previous finding that PSA-based screening reduces PC mortality but does not affect all cause mortality. (The trial is registered in the ISRCTN registry under number 49127736.)
The recommended dose for disease-directed studies of OSI-774 administered orally on a daily, continuous, uninterrupted schedule is 150 mg/d. OSI-774 was well tolerated, and several patients with epidermoid malignancies demonstrated either antitumor activity or relatively long periods of stable disease. The precise contribution of OSI-774 to these effects is not known.
Background: The European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has previously demonstrated that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening decreases prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. Objective: To determine whether PSA screening decreases PCa mortality for up to 16 yr and to assess results following adjustment for nonparticipation and the number of screening rounds attended. Design, setting, and participants: This multicentre population-based randomised screening trial was conducted in eight European countries. Report includes
Purpose:To assess the feasibility of administering XRP6258, a new taxane with a low affinity for the multidrug resistance 1protein, as a 1-hour i.v. infusion every 3 weeks.The study also sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose, to describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of the compound, and to seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. Experimental Design: Twenty-five patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with 102 courses of XRP6258 at four dose levels ranging from 10 to 25 mg/m 2 . Dose escalation was based on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at each dose level, provided that PK variables were favorable. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the dose at which at least two patients developed a DLTat the first course. Results: Neutropenia was the principal DLT, with one patient experiencing febrile neutropenia and two others showing prolonged grade 4 neutropenia at the 25 mg/m 2 dose level. Nonhematologic toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, neurotoxicity, and fatigue, were generally mild to moderate in severity. XRP6258 exhibited dose-proportional PK, a triphasic elimination profile, a long terminal half-life (77.3 hours), a high clearance (mean CL, 53.5 L/h), and a large volume of distribution (mean V ss , 2,034 L/m 2 ). Objective antitumor activity included partial responses in two patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma, one unconfirmed partial response, and two minor responses. Conclusion: The recommended phase II dose of XRP6258 on this schedule is 20 mg/m 2 . The general tolerability and encouraging antitumor activity in taxane-refractory patients warrant further evaluations of XRP6258.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.