Dose escalation to 50 Gy has been completed without DLT. A multicenter phase II trial is underway treating patients to 50 Gy in five fractions to further evaluate this experimental therapy.
Introduction: The impact of dysphagia in persons with lung cancer is unknown. The objective of this study is to measure the prevalence and survival differences associated with dysphagia in older adults with lung cancer. Materials and Methods: Linked SEER cancer registries -Medicare data, 1991-2009 was utilized to identify 201,674 persons with lung cancer. Most were male (53%), had regional or distant disease (74%), and were aged b80 years (82%). The pre-existing prevalence of dysphagia was identified using claims codes before the lung cancer diagnosis. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: 8517 (4%) had dysphagia prior to their lung cancer diagnoses. Younger age, worse disease stage, more comorbidities, and hospital rurality were associated with higher likelihood of dysphagia. Patients with dysphagia had worse survival (median survival 8 months [95%CI 7,9]) than those without dysphagia (median survival 12 months [95%CI 11,13]). After adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and disease characteristics, dysphagia was still associated with worse survival (Hazard ratio of death 1.34, [95%CI 1.28-1.35], p ≤ .0001). Discussion and Conclusions: This is the first Medicare claims-based study of older adults with lung cancer and dysphagia. Pre-existing dysphagia occurred in approximately 1 in 25 patients with lung cancer and was associated with worse survival. Determining the best methods to evaluate and treat dysphagia in patients with lung cancer is an important avenue for future studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.