Heart failure is one of the key causes of morbidity and mortality world-wide. The recent findings that regeneration is possible in the heart have made stem cell therapeutics the Holy Grail of modern cardiovascular medicine. The success of cardiac regenerative therapies hinges on the combination of an effective allogeneic “off the shelf” cell product with a practical delivery system. In 2007 Medistem discovered the Endometrial Regenerative Cell (ERC), a new mesenchymal-like stem cell. Medistem and subsequently independent groups have demonstrated that ERC are superior to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), the most widely used stem cell source in development. ERC possess robust expansion capability (one donor can generate 20,000 patients doses), key growth factor production and high levels of angiogenic activity. ERC have been published in the peer reviewed literature to be significantly more effect at treating animal models of heart failure (Hida et al. Stem Cells 2008).Current methods of delivering stem cells into the heart suffer several limitations in addition to poor delivery efficiency. Surgical methods are highly invasive, and the classical catheter based techniques are limited by need for sophisticated cardiac mapping systems and risk of myocardial perforation. Medistem together with Dr. Amit Patel Director of Clinical Regenerative Medicine at University of Utah have developed a novel minimally invasive delivery method that has been demonstrated safe and effective for delivery of stem cells (Tuma et al. J Transl Med 2012). Medistem is evaluating the combination of ERC, together with our retrograde delivery procedure in a 60 heart failure patient, double blind, placebo controlled phase II trial. To date 17 patients have been dosed and preliminary analysis by the Data Safety Monitoring Board has allowed for trial continuation.The combined use of a novel “off the shelf” cell together with a minimally invasive 30 minute delivery method provides a potentially paradigm-shifting approach to cardiac regenerative therapy.

No abstract

Background Muscular counterpulsation (MCP) was developed for circulatory assistance by stimulation of peripheral skeletal muscles. We report on a clinical MCP study in patients with and without chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods and Results MCP treatment was applied (30 patients treated, 25 controls, all under optimal therapy) for 30 minutes during eight days by an ECG-triggered, battery-powered, portable pulse generator with skin electrodes inducing light contractions of calf and thigh muscles, sequentially stimulated at early diastole. Hemodynamic parameters (ECG, blood pressure and echocardiography) were measured one day before and one day after the treatment period in two groups: Group 1 (9 MCP, 11 no MCP) with ejection fraction (EF) above 40% and Group 2 (21 MCP, 14 no MCP) below 40%. In Group 2 (all patients suffering from CHF) mean EF increased by 21% (p<0.001) and stroke volume by 13% (pp<0.001), while end systolic volume decreased by 23% (pp<0.001). In Group 1, the increase in EF (6%) and stroke volume (8%) was also significant (pp<0.05) but less pronounced than in Group 2. Physical exercise duration and walking distance increased in Group 2 by 56% and 72%, respectively. Conclusions Noninvasive MCP treatment for eight days substantially improves cardiac function and physical performance in patients with CHF.

Background. Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery. It has been proven to be associated with an increase in the incidence of early complications and mortality, an increase in the rate of hospital stay duration, and economic costs of their treatment. One of the pharmaceutical drugs recommended by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) for preventing POAF is colchicine (class IIB). However, the results of research on the efficacy and safety of colchicine are ambiguous and, consequently, require further study. Objective. Evaluating the efficacy of short-term colchicine administration in the prevention of POAF in patients after open-heart surgery. Materials and methods. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The subjects were randomly assigned to two groups: treatment group (n = 50) with subjects receiving 1 mg of colchicine 24 h before the surgery, as well as on days 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the postoperative period; and the control group (n = 51), receiving placebo on the same schedule. The primary endpoint was the frequency of POAF in both groups within 7 days after surgery. Results. The study included 101 patients (82 men, 19 women). Baseline clinical, laboratory, instrumental, and intraoperative data did not differ statistically significantly between the groups. POAF was detected in 9 patients (18%) of the treatment group and 15 subjects (29.4%) of the control group, which had no statistical significance (odds ratio, OR 0.527; 95% Cl 0.206–1.349; p = 0.178). No statistically significant differences were revealed for most secondary endpoints, as well as between the groups for all laboratory parameters. There were statistically significant differences between the groups solely in the frequency of diarrhea: 16 (32%) patients in the treatment group and 6 (11.8%) subjects in the control group (OR 3.529; 95% Cl 1.249–9.972; p = 0.010). Conclusions. We did not detect any statistical differences between the groups in terms of primary endpoints, which could be due to the insufficient volume of the sample of the study. However, we detected some trends of statistical differences among the groups in terms of some parameters. Clinical Trials Registration. ClinicalTrials. Unique identifier: NCT04224545.

Introduction

No abstract

Background. In patients who underwent cardiac surgery, first-time postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with increased incidence of hospital-acquired complications and mortality. Systemic inflammation is one of confirmed triggers of its development. The anti-inflammatory properties of colchicine can be effective for the POAF prevention. However, the results of several studies were questionable and required further investigation. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose short-term colchicine administration for POAF prevention in patients after the open-heart surgery. This double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial included 267 patients, but 27 of them dropped out in the course of the study. Study subjects received the test drug on the day before the surgery and on postoperative days 2, 3, 4 and 5. The rhythm control was conducted immediately after the operation and until the discharge from the hospital. The final analysis included 240 study subjects: 113 in the colchicine group and 127 in the placebo group. POAF was observed in 21 (18.6%) patients of the colchicine group vs. 39 (30.7%) control patients (OR 0.515; 95% Cl 0.281–0.943; p = 0.029). We observed no statistically significant differences between the patient groups in the secondary endpoints of the study (hospital mortality, respiratory failure, stroke, bleeding, etc.). For other parameters characterizing the severity of inflammation (pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, WBC count, neutrophil count), there were statistically significant differences between the groups in the early postoperative period (days 3 and 5). Also, statistically significant differences between the groups in the frequency of adverse events were revealed: the incidence of diarrhea in the colchicine group was 25.7% vs. 11.8% in the placebo group (OR 2.578; 95% Cl 1.300–5.111; p = 0.005); for abdominal pain, incidence values were 7% vs. 1.6%, correspondingly (OR 4.762; 95% Cl 1.010–22.91; p = 0.028). Thus, there were statistically significant differences between groups in the primary endpoint, thereby confirming the effectiveness of short-term colchicine use for the POAF prevention after coronary artery bypass grafting and/or aortic valve replacement. Also, we detected statistically significant differences between groups in the frequency of side effects to colchicine: diarrhea and abdominal pain were more common in the colchicine group. This clinical trial is registered with ClinicalTrials database under a unique identifier: NCT04224545.

No abstract