Prognostic factors in superficial bladder tumours are highly correlated with each other. In this study, their relative importance is examined and grouping of patients in three different prognostic groups suggested. 576 patients (from EORTC protocols 30790 and 30782) were analysed. They have been followed from 3 months to 8.6 years with a median of 4 years. 76 patients developed an invasive tumour (>:T2); the shortest time to invasion was 12 weeks, the longest was 6.6 years. Time from invasion to death ranged from 3 weeks to 4.4 years with a median of 2 years. Prognostic factors contributing to recurrence, invasion and survival were investigated: age, sex, size of largest tumour, number of tumours, T-category, G-grade, time from diagnosis (years), prior recurrence rate/year, site of involvement. The relative importance of these factors was measured by performing a multivariate analysis based on Cox's proportional hazards regression model. Based on the most important prognostic factors and their association with invasion and death, an index was computed reflecting the risk of both invasion and death due to malignant disease, respectively. The index was used to assign patients to one of three prognostic groups. Three main factors determined patient's prognosis: tumour size, G-grade and prior recurrence rate/year. The model coefficients for invasion were 0.51 (recurrence rate 3/year), 0.84 (grade 1, 2, 3), 0.48 (size <1.5, 1.5-3, > 3 cm) and for death due to malignant disease 0.89 (recurrence rate), 0.73 (grade) and 0.44 (size), respectively. Risk groups are suggested based on the index. Additional treatment in patients with superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder may be decided depending on the risk group to which the patient belongs.
For bladder cancer we currently lack accurate methods of predicting outcome, although clinical stage and histological grade are broad determinants of prognosis. Preliminary data have indicated that assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor status is a method of further subclassifying bladder cancer. We assessed prospectively the clinical significance of determining epidermal growth factor receptor status in 212 patients with newly diagnosed bladder cancer who were followed for 1 to 96 months (mean 26.5). In multivariate analyses epidermal growth factor receptor was confirmed to be an independent predictor of survival (p = 0.004) and stage progression (p = 0.0004). Most importantly, epidermal growth factor receptor status was found to be 80% sensitive and 93% specific in predicting stage progression in T1, grade 3 bladder cancer. We conclude that epidermal growth factor receptor status is a useful molecular marker in patients with bladder cancer, especially those without infiltration of the detrusor muscle at presentation.
Forty-two patients with previously untreated T3/4 N1-4 MO/1 prostatic adenocarcinoma were treated with either cyproterone acetate (n = 21; 300 mg intramuscularly per week) or oestradiol undecylate (n = 21; 100 mg intramuscularly per month) after extensive staging which included open skeletal biopsy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in some cases. Subjective and objective parameters as well as signs of drug toxicity were recorded regularly. Evaluation after 6 months showed cyproterone acetate to be more effective in the following respects: (1) the significantly different castration effect as judged by plasma testosterone, (2) the objective voiding pattern and tumour response, with regression of palpable and histologically evaluable local tumour in 16 of 21 patients, and (3) side effects and untoward reactions. Thus cyproterone acetate is suggested as a valuable alternative in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.