No abstract

Prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telehealth was rarely utilized for oncologic care in metropolitan areas. Our large New York City based outpatient breast/gynecologic cancer clinic administered an 18-question survey to patients from March to June 2020, to assess the perceptions of the utility of telehealth medicine. Of the 622 patients, 215 (35%) completed the survey, and of the 215 respondents, 74 (35%) had participated in a telehealth visit. We evaluated the use of telehealth services using the validated Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire. Sixty-eight patients (92%) reported that telehealth services saved them time, 54 (73%) reported telehealth increased access to care, and 58 (82%) reported telehealth improved their health. Overall, 67 (92%) of patients expressed satisfaction with the use of telehealth services for oncologic care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telehealth services should be carefully adopted as an addition to in-person clinical care of patients with cancer.

This study evaluated the mental health and cancer treatment-related impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with breast and gynecologic cancers. An 18-question survey was administered in June 2020 at a New York City-based cancer center to assess the quality of life (QOL) and overall health (OH) during both the pandemic time period from March 1, 2020, through June 30, 2020, and the pre-pandemic period (prior to March 1, 2020). Survey questions were answered on a 5-point Likert scale and a 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 QOL scale. Differences in mean QOL and OH scores were evaluated using a paired t-test. QOL and OH were significantly worsened by the pandemic, with significant increases in anxiety, depression, and mood swings.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess for clinicopathologic and socioeconomic features that predict improved survival for patients with advanced breast cancer with synchronous brain metastases at diagnosis. Methods: We utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify all patients with brain metastases present at diagnosis, with adequate information on receptor status (ER, PR, Her2), clinical T stage of cT1-4, clinical M1, with 3,943 patients available for analysis. The association between brain metastases patterns and patient/disease variables was examined by robust Poisson regression model. Cox proportional hazards model was used to quantify the associations between overall survival (OS) and these variables. Results: In univariable analysis, OS was significantly associated with the number of sites of metastases (p < 0.0001). Patients with 2 or more additional extracranial sites of metastases had significantly worse OS (median 8.8 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8, 9.9) than patients with brain metastases only (median OS 10.6 months, 95% CI 9.4, 12.9) or brain metastases plus one other extracranial site of metastases (median OS 13.1 months, 95% CI 11.8, 14.4). Risk factors which predicted poor prognosis included triple-negative disease, high comorbidity score, poorly differentiated tumors, invasive lobular histology, multi-organ involvement of metastases, and government or lack of insurance. Factors which improve survival include younger age and Hispanic race. Discussion/Conclusion: Using a large NCDB, we identified various factors associated with prognosis for patients with brain metastases at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. Insurance status and related socioeconomic challenges provide potential areas for improvement in care for these patients. This information may help stratify patients into prognostic categories at the time of diagnosis to improve treatment plans.

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay is a 21-gene assay used to predict the likelihood of distant recurrence and the benefit of chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer. Prior studies demonstrated 7–19% discordance, or a difference between the recurrence score (RS) and tumor grade (TG) in breast cancer patients. BRCA mutated tumors (BRCA+) have been shown to be associated with higher RS as compared to BRCA-negative patients (BRCA–). <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> We developed a large Oncotype RS database to determine if the BRCA mutation status is associated with discordance. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We identified 723 patients (32 [4%] mutation-positive and 691 [96%] mutation-negative patients) with early-stage, hormone-positive breast cancer treated between 2006 and 2018, with tumor characteristics available for analysis. Discordance was defined as one- or two-step difference between RS (low, intermediate, high risk) and TG (well [WD], moderately [MD], and poorly [PD] differentiated). Mutation positive was defined as BRCA1 deleterious mutation, BRCA2 deleterious mutation, BRCA mutation of unknown type, BRCA variant of undetermined significance (VUS) or other mutation (classified as other VUS). Number (%) or median were used to describe patient characteristics between groups and were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test at a significance level of 5%. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among these patients, there were 32 (4% of total) who were identified as mutation-positive. Of those patients, 16% had a documented deleterious mutation in BRCA1, 22% in BRCA2, 6% had a BRCA mutation of unknown type (either 1 or 2), 25% were BRCA VUS, and 31% other VUS (most commonly CHEK2 and ATM). The median RS was 23.5 in patients with deleterious BRCA mutations (1, 2 or unknown) versus 16 in patients in the BRCA-negative database, which was statistically significant (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). One- and two-step discordance was present in 46 and 8%, respectively, of patients with deleterious BRCA mutations versus 53 and 11%, respectively, in the BRCA-negative database. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients with deleterious BRCA mutations demonstrated no difference in rates of discordance as compared to BRCA-negative patients. We further demonstrated that patients with BRCA-positive tumors display higher RS than patients with BRCA-negative tumors.