No abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the performance of PCR for the diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (SPT) and to identify factors that account for differences in the diagnostic accuracy of different studies. Studies published before February 2002 were included if sensitivity and specificity of PCR in smear-negative respiratory or gastric-aspirate specimens could be calculated. Analysis was conducted by using summary receiver operating characteristics models. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 9 to 100% and from 25 to 100%, respectively. Fewer than 40% of the 50 studies reported results by number of patients, reported clinical characteristics of patients, or used as a reference standard combined culture and clinical criteria. Studies that included bronchial specimens showed higher accuracy than studies that evaluated only sputum specimens or included gastric aspirates. Studies that did not report that tests were applied blindly showed higher accuracy than those reporting blind testing. Increased sensitivity due to the use of DNA purification methods was associated with decreased specificity. Studies published after 1995, using Amplicor or dUTP-UNG, were associated with an increase in specificity at the expense of lower sensitivity. We concluded that PCR is not consistently accurate enough to be routinely recommended for the diagnosis of SPT. However, PCR of bronchial specimens could be useful in highly suspicious SPT cases. Studies not reporting blind testing are likely to overestimate accuracy of PCR. Future evaluation of PCR accuracy should be conducted by patient and type of respiratory specimen, blindly, by using a reference standard that combines culture and clinical criteria and addresses the issue of how patient characteristics affect PCR accuracy.Tuberculosis remains an important public health problem worldwide, accounting for ca. 8.0 million new cases per year (25). Smear-negative cases pose an important public health hazard and burden, accounting for as much as 17% of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission (11). Some patients convert to smear positivity, leading to a more severe morbidity (20). Approximately 20 to 50% of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis are smear negative, and 10% of these patients are culture negative (6,25).PCR reduces the time required for the identification of the Mycobacterium and may enhance the detection of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (SPT) cases. However, qualitative reviews (4,23,27,30,64) and interlaboratory studies (46, 47) have pointed out the low sensitivity of PCR for the diagnosis of SPT and the significant variability in sensitivity and specificity in different studies. Proposed explanations for these findings have included differences in decontamination procedures (47), cross contamination (46), inhibition (27), sampling error (27), quality of the reference standard (27), and mixture of respiratory and other specimens (30).Although numerous studies have contributed to our understanding of PCR performance for the diagnosis of pulm...

We evaluated PCR methods for diagnosis of acute and chronic cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in an area of Colombia where Leishmania (Viannia) is endemic. The PCR method specifically amplified whole linearized minicircle kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) of the Leishmania subgenus Viannia from biopsy lysates. PCR products were detected in agarose gels. For 255 acute cases, this PCR method had greater sensitivity (75.7%) than each conventional method, i.e., microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained lesion scraping (46.7%), biopsy culture (55.3%), aspirate culture (46.3%), and the conventional methods combined (70.2%). Among 44 cases of chronic CL, amplification of biopsy DNA was more sensitive (45.5%) than the individual (4.5 to 27.7%) and combined (27.3%) conventional methods. The detection of kDNA in biopsies from chronic lesions was enhanced by a chemiluminescent dot blot hybridization, which produced a sensitivity of 65.8% when alone and 90.9% when in combination with DNA extraction of biopsy lysates (P < 0.001). Three biopsies from 84 skin lesions of other etiologies were falsely positive by PCR (specificity, 96.4%). PCR detected kDNA more frequently in biopsies (detection level, 83.9%) than in aspirates (74.7%) from 103 cases of acute CL. Among aspirates from 53 chronic cases of CL, the alternative methods, DNA extraction and hybridization, increased sensitivity from 41.5 to 56.6% (P > 0.05). This enhanced PCR method in chronic biopsies was so much more sensitive than conventional methods that it should be considered the preferred diagnostic method for chronic CL. These findings support the appropriate incorporation of PCR into diagnostic strategies for cutaneous leishmaniasis.The leishmaniases are a group of illnesses of the skin, oral and respiratory mucosae and the reticuloendothelium caused by protozoa of the genus Leishmania. Of these, the cutaneous form is the most widespread, afflicting primarily rural and periurban populations exposed to the infected sand fly vector. Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is most frequently diagnosed by clinical evaluation, either alone or in combination with the leishmanin skin test. Clinical evaluation usually suffers from lack of standardization (13,38) and is hampered by the fact that even fairly typical acute lesions can be confused with other dermatological problems, such as sporotrichosis (9). The leishmanin skin test is highly sensitive but lacks specificity when employed in areas of endemicity because it cannot distinguish acute lesions from past infection. A definitive, laboratory diagnosis of mucosal or cutaneous leishmaniasis traditionally requires either the visualization of amastigotes or the isolation of replicative Leishmania from lesions (24). The most widely employed laboratory methods for CL are microscopic examination of lesion scrapings, biopsy impression smears, and histopathology. The most sensitive conventional diagnostic methods, culture of lesion biopsies and aspirates, are available only in reference laboratories. Even these less available, more sensitive methods ...

Most hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections in sub-Saharan African infants and children are acquired through horizontal transmission, but the exact mechanisms of spread have not been documented. The authors conducted a study in rural Ghana which determined seroprevalence in a probability sample of 1,385 individuals of all ages, and evaluated risk factors for horizontal transmission of HBV in a subsample of 547 children aged 1-16 years who were not hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers. Most residents in this district live in compounds which typically contain 2-4 households each. Overall prevalence of HBV seropositives (any HBV marker) was 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72.5%-76.9%). Prevalence of HBsAg was 20.9% (95% CI 18.8%-23.1%). The data suggest a continuous nonuniform acquisition of HBV infection with advancing age predominantly through horizontal transmission in childhood, with the household, rather than the domestic compound, being the primary place for transmission. The behaviors most strongly associated with prevalence of HBV were sharing of bath towels (OR = 3.1, 95% CI 2.1-4.5), sharing of chewing gum or partially eaten candies (OR = 3.4, 95% CI 2.3-5.0), sharing of dental cleaning materials (OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.6), and biting of fingernails in conjunction with scratching the backs of carriers (OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-4.3).

No abstract