The aims of this study are to know and to analyze the contribution of parking retribution on the side of the road towards the improvement of locally-generated revenue in Ngawi Regency. In addition, it is to measure the whether or not the parking retribution on the side of the road in Ngawi is in accordance with the regional regulation number 23/2011 on parking retribution on the side of the road. This study use empirical juridical research design. The types of data used in this study are primary and secondary data. These data are obtained directly through interview, observation, and documentation. The data is analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Then, it is presented in a descriptive way. The result showed that the contribution of parking retribution on the side of the road towards the improvement of locally-generated revenue in Ngawi Regency in 2013-2017 is decreased. The biggest contribution was in 2013 with 4.69%, while the lowest contribution is in 2016 with 2.104%. Nowadays, the implementation of parking service in Ngawi Regency is not in accoradance with the regulation number 23/2011 concerning parking retribution on the side of the road.
Abstract— The capital market is an investment alternative for investors. Through the capital market, investors can invest in several companies through the purchase of securities offered. Investors will become shareholders in publicly-listed companies. The purpose of this study is about the position of capital market investors in the event of bankruptcy in the issuer's company and know the form of protection that can provide protection for capital market investors. The research method used is a normative research method by reviewing legislation. the position of capital market investors in the event of bankruptcy in the issuer's company is that the public shareholders are creditors who are included in the competitor (concurrent) while the form of legal protection needed is to maximize the functions and roles of OJK as the protectors of the issuer's stock which is accurately related to the performance and financial condition of public companies because the principle of openness is one of the rights that guarantees legal protection, and makes efforts to restructure the issuer's company to avoid bankruptcy. Keywords—: legal protection; investors; capital market; bankruptcy; issuers.
Abstract— Despite the various controversies, the presence of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation have repealed at least two regulations and changed at least 80 (eight twenty) other laws. One of those affected is the Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (UU PT). Study This study intends to examine what the existing concepts and problems look like on the Omnibus Law on Job Creation, as well as its implications for the regulation and the basic concept of a Limited Liability Company. This study is a normative research (doctrinal) to secondary data obtained from literature studies (library research), which consists of primary and secondary legal materials. Research result shows that the Omnibus Law is a legislative method by unites various types of laws into one specific law. This has the potential to negate the diverse interests of each laws in the name of one interest only. In addition, the practice of drafting it in Indonesia does not have a juridical basis and violates the principle of openness and participation. In terms of its implications for the PT Law, a number of the provisions in the Omnibus Law on Job Creation have expanded the meaning of the Company Limited by presenting the Sole Proprietorship model which gives birth to a number of contradictions in the basic concept of a Limited Liability Company, in addition to removing the minimum capital limit of the Company which is feared will cause vulnerabilities for business continuity.
Purpose: This study aims to analyze the impact of the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021 regarding the permissibility of cassation in the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU). Methodology: The research method that the researcher uses is a normative research method by reviewing statutory regulations and related legal materials. Results: The judge's consideration in the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021, is the permitting of a cassation legal action against the decision on Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations submitted by the creditor and the rejection of the offer of reconciliation from the debtor so that the court's decision on the PKPU application submitted by the creditor can be corrected as part of the mechanism. control over court decisions at lower levels. However, with this decision, it is necessary to immediately issue implementing regulations regarding the mechanism for submitting PKPU and it is necessary to control the good faith of creditors so that they do not actually injure. This is because the existence of debtors is also part of business actors who play a role in maintaining economic stability so that business continuity is maintained and it is not misused. That way, the legal certainty of the PKPU instrument can really be realized in accordance with the spirit of Law 37/2004, which is to provide legal protection for business actors. Applications of the study: It is hoped that the legal certainty of the PKPU instrument can actually be realized in accordance with the spirit of Law Number 37 of 2004, which is to provide balanced legal protection between debtors and creditors. Novelty/ Orginalty of this study : This research is only because the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021 has just been issued and the author analyzes the impact of the issuance of the decision on creditors and debtors.
The papers aims to analyze the legal construction between bank-creditor and bank-debitor in the sub-participation contract, which apparently has not been well covered by the two legal fields in the event of a dispute, whereas the funds lent in the banking business are very important to immediately withdraw and run to extend credit to other sectors, or to support the liquidity. In the case of bankruptcy requests for the banks, Bank Indonesia is legally entitled to submit to the Commercial Court even not as a part of contract. However, the institution never once took a request to the Commercial Court. Even before Indonesian banking supervision adopted a multiple supervision of banking system. Bankruptcy Act 2004 does not legally entitled the right to the crditor directly, nor does Banking Act 1998 regulate the mechanism of creditor' claim in the event of a sub-participation contract, other than complaining to Bank Indonesia to request being his "advocate(?)" to litigate to the court.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.