We developed a novel flow particle analyzer that automatically classifies airborne pollen grains. The design of the particle counter (model KP-1000) is based on that of a flow cytometer, applied to the measurement of airborne particles. The counter classifies pollen species by simultaneously detecting both scattered light and the characteristic fluorescence excited by ultraviolet light in the flow cell. We observed airborne pollen using KP-1000 pollen counters and Durham samplers to compare their performance at three study sites in Japan during the spring pollen season. The pollen counter followed the variation in pollen concentrations, and its daily pollen counts were significantly correlated with the results of the Durham sampling method at all study sites. Although the counter over-or under-counted 2 target pollen species (Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa) when they coexisted, a data correction based on the Durham sampling results improved the accuracy of pollen classification of the counter. Our results indicate that the new pollen counter has a strong potential for counting and identifying airborne pollen grains in real time, and it requires further improvement, field trials, and tests with other common airborne pollen grains.
Exposure of Limulus amoebocyte lysate to endotoxin under stirring produced light-reflective particles that appeared to be coagulin polymers. A laser light-scattering particle counter, the PA-200, detected these particles sensitively. The PA-200 detected endotoxin at a concentration as low as 0.00015 EU/ml in 71 min, whereas the minimum endotoxin concentration measured by a turbidimeter, ET-2000, was 0.0005 EU/ml in 138 min. Moreover, PA-200 was much less affected by the presence of colored substances and refractive materials than was ET-2000. We propose that the high sensitivity, speed, and high interference tolerance of the laser light-scattering particle-counting method make it more useful than the widely used turbidimetric method for quantitative endotoxin assay.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.