If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

IntroductionBeta-lactams (BL) are the most frequently reported drug allergy, but the vast majority of patients are found not to be genuinely allergic after evaluation. Few studies have investigated the clinical predictors of genuine BL allergy, and the prevalence in hospitalized Chinese patients is unknown.MethodsPatients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong (HK) were analyzed to identify the prevalence and factors associated with the presence of BL allergy labels among hospitalized Chinese patients. A combined cohort of patients having completed allergy investigation for suspected BL allergies in the United Kingdom (UK) and HK were analyzed to identify predictors of genuine allergy.ResultsThe prevalence of BL allergy labels in hospitalized HK Chinese was 5%, which was associated with female gender and concomitant non-BL antibiotic allergy labels. The rate of genuine BL allergy patients referred for suspected allergies in the UK and HK cohort was only 14%. History of anaphylaxis and interval of less than a year since the index reaction were independent clinical predictors of genuine BL allergy. The negative predictive value of penicillin skin testing was 90%, confirming the need for drug provocation testing after negative skin testing. There was a high rate of confirmed piperacillin-tazobactam allergy.DiscussionThe estimated true prevalence of genuine BL allergy in hospitalized HK Chinese is around 0.5%. This high rate of BL mislabeling highlights the need for comprehensive allergy evaluation and screening. History of anaphylaxis and duration since the index reaction are important predictors of genuine allergy. Piperacillin-tazobactam allergy may pose a unique challenge in this population with a high prevalence of suspected allergies, surging antibiotic resistance, and lack of testing available.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Table of contentsOral AbstractsO1 Functionally distinct HMGB1 isoforms correlate with physiological processes in drug-induced SJS/TENDaniel F. Carr, Wen-Hung Chung, Rosalind E. Jenkiins, Mas Chaponda, Gospel Nwikue, Elena M. Cornejo Castro, Daniel J. Antoine, Munir PirmohamedO2 Hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactams, does the t cell recognition pattern influence the clinical picture?Natascha Wuillemin, Dolores Dina, Klara K. Eriksson, Daniel YerlyO3 Specific binding characteristics of HLA alleles associated with nevirapine hypersensitivityRebecca Pavlos, Elizabeth Mckinnin, David Ostrov, Bjoern Peters, Soren Buus, David Koelle, Abha Chopra, Craig Rive, Alec Redwood, Susana Restrepo, Austin Bracey, Jing Yuan, Silvana Gaudieri, Mary Carrington, David Haas, Simon Mallal, Elizabeth PhillipsO4 Do we need to measure total ige for the interpretation of analytical results of ImmunoCAP dnd 3gAllergy specific IgE?Douwe De Boer, Paul Menheere, Chris Nieuwhof, Judith BonsO5 Neutrophil activation in systemic anaphylaxis: results from the multicentric NASA studyFriederike Jonsson, Luc De Chaisemartin, Vanessa Granger, Caitlin Gillis, Aurelie Gouel, Catherine Neukirch, Fadia Dib, Pascale Roland Nicaise, Dan Longrois, Florence Tubach, Sylvie Martin, Pierre Bruhns, NASA Study GroupO6 Purpuric drug eruptions due to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a clinic-pathological study of 32 casesKai-Lung Chen, Shu-Ling Liao, Yi-Shuan Sheen, Yung-Tsu Cho, Che-Wen Yang, Jau-Yu Liau, Chia-Yu ChuPoster presentations: Poster Walk 1—Anaphylaxis (P01–P09)P1 Anaphylactic reactions during anaesthesia and the perioperative periodRita Aguiar, Anabela Lopes, Natália Fernandes, Leonor Viegas, M. A. Pereira-BarbosaP2 Anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine: is there a cross-reactivity to alexidine?Antonia Bünter, Nisha Gupta, Tatjana Pecaric Petkovic, Nicole Wirth, Werner J. Pichler, Oliver HausmannP3 Cefotaxime-induced severe anaphylaxis in a neonateMehtap Yazicioglu, Pinar G. Ozdemir, Gokce Ciplak, Ozkan KayaP4 Clinical features and diagnosis of anaphylaxis resulting from exposure to chlorhexidinePeter John CookeP5 Drug-induced anaphylaxis: five-year single-center surveyInês Mota, Ângela Gaspar, Filipe Benito-Garcia, Marta Chambel, Mário Morais-AlmeidaP6 Intraoperative severe anaphylactic reaction due to patent blue v dyeLuis Marques, Eva Alcoceba, Silvia LaraP7 Kounis syndrome in the setting of anaphylaxis to diclofenacLeonor Carneiro-Leão, Carmen Botelho, Eunice Dias-Castro, Josefina CernadasP8 Perioperative anaphylaxis audit: Royal Melbourne HospitalKatherine Nicholls, William Lay, Olivia Smith, Christine Collins, Gary Unglik, Kymble Spriggs, Priscilla Auyeung, Jeremy McComish, Jo A. DouglassP9 Recurrent peri-operative anaphylaxis: a perfect stormJonny G. Peter, Paul PotterPoster Walk 2: DH regions and patient groups (P10–P19)P10 A rare presentation of amoxicillin allergy in a young childFabrícia Carolino, Eunice Dias De Castro, Josefina R. CernadasP11 Adverse drug reactions in ...

No abstract