Background-The management of aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) involving the ascending aorta (type A) has not been well-established. The purpose of this study was to clarify the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with type A IMH who were treated with medical therapy and timely operation. Methods and Results-Clinical data including operative mortality, IMH-related events, and long-term survival were retrospectively reviewed in 66 patients with type A IMH, who were admitted to our institution from 1986 to 2006. Emergent surgical repair was performed in 16 (24%) patients because of severe complications, whereas 50 patients were treated with initial medical therapy. In medically treated patients, 15 (30%) patients who demonstrated progression to classic dissection or increase in hematoma size within 30 days underwent surgical repair except for 2 patients who refused surgery. The 30-day mortality rate was 6% with emergent surgery and 4% with supportive medial therapy. There were 7 late deaths and the actuarial survival rates of all patients were 96Ϯ3%, 94Ϯ3%, and 89Ϯ5% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. In medically treated patients, maximum aortic diameter was the only predictor of early and late progression of ascending IMH (hazard ratio, 4.43; 95% CI, 2.04 -9.64; PϽ0.001). Aortic diameter Ն50 mm predicted progression of ascending IMH with the positive and negative value of 83% and 84%, respectively. Conclusions-Combination

No abstract

No abstract

Background-The long-term clinical course of patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) and predictors for progression remains unknown. The difference of aortic pathology may have a different impact on clinical course compared with classic aortic dissection (AD). The purpose of this study was to investigate long-term clinical course and predictors of progression in patients with type B IMH. Methods and Results-Clinical data were compared retrospectively between 53 patients with acute type B IMH (IMH group) and 57 patients with acute type B AD (AD group). All patients were treated initially with medical therapy. Two patients in IMH group and 14 patients in AD group underwent surgical repair because of aortic enlargement. The in-hospital mortality rate in IMH group was significantly lower than that in AD group (0% and 14%, Pϭ0.006). Mean follow-up periods were 53Ϯ43 months, which revealed 3 and 5 late deaths, respectively. Eleven patients with IMH showed progression (development of aortic dissection or aortic enlargement) in follow-up imaging study. The actuarial survival rates in IMH group were 100%, 97%, and 97% at 1, 2, and 5 years, which were significantly higher than those in AD group (83%, 79%, and 79%) (Pϭ0.009). Multivariate analysis identified age Ͼ70 years and new appearance of an ulcerlike projection as the strongest predictors of progression in patients with IMH. Conclusions-Patients

The necrotic core component identified with VH-IVUS is related to liberation of small embolic particles during coronary stenting, which results in the poorer recovery of CFVR.