Background-In Japan, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is accepted as a treatment option for cases of early gastric cancer (EGC) where the probability of lymph node metastasis is low. The results of EMR for EGC at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, over a 11 year period are presented. Methods-EMR was applied to patients with early cancers up to 30 mm in diameter that were of a well or moderately histologically diVerentiated type, and were superficially elevated and/or depressed (types I, IIa, and IIc) but without ulceration or definite signs of submucosal invasion. The resected specimens were carefully examined by serial sections at 2 mm intervals, and if histopathology revealed submucosal invasion and/or vessel involvement or if the resection margin was not clear, surgery was recommended. Results-Four hundred and seventy nine cancers in 445 patients were treated by EMR from 1987 to 1998 but submucosal invasion was found on subsequent pathological examination in 74 tumours. Sixty nine percent of intramucosal cancers (278/ 405) were resected with a clear margin. Of 127 cancers without "complete resection", 14 underwent an additional operation and nine were treated endoscopically; the remainder had intensive follow up. Local recurrence in the stomach occurred in 17 lesions followed conservatively, in one lesion treated endoscopically, and in five lesions with complete resection. All tumours were diagnosed by follow up endoscopy and subsequently treated by surgery. There were no gastric cancer related deaths during a median follow up period of 38 months (3-120 months). Bleeding and perforation (5%) were two major complications of EMR but there were no treatment related deaths. Conclusion-In our experience, EMR allows us to perform less invasive treatment without sacrificing the possibility of cure. (Gut 2001;48:225-229)
Compared with conventional EMR, this new method may have significant benefits, particularly regarding one-piece resection of lesions between 11 and 20 mm in size, and may also have a lower recurrence rate.
Peritoneal dissemination is one of the most common complications of the malignancies of the digestive system, such as gastric or pancreatic cancers. Yet, no effective therapy has been established so far to alleviate this devastating and often fatal end-stage condition. Here we describe a novel approach of intraperitoneal (i.p.) lipofection of a suicidal gene to the pancreatic cancer cells in a mouse peritoneal dissemination model. A human pancreatic cancer cell line, PSN-1, was inoculated into the peritoneal cavity of nude mice. Eight days later, a herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) gene expression plasmid under a potent hybrid promoter CAG was injected as a DNA-lipopolyamine complex. Ganciclovir (GCV) was then administered for 8 days, and the mice were examined for tumor development at the 24th day after the tumor inoculation. Although all 24 control mice showed macroscopic peritoneal dissemination and solid tumors on the pancreas, 8 of the 14 mice treated with HSV-TK and GCV were free of tumors, and only a few small tumors were observed in the remaining 6 mice. Treatment-related toxicity was not observed. The semiquantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis suggested that the HSV-TK transgene was expressed in about 10% of tumor cells but not in the normal pancreas or in the small intestine. When the lacZ gene was transduced in place of the HSV-TK gene, the blue-stained cells were identified only in tumor nodules and not in normal organs. This preclinical study suggests the therapeutic feasibility of the i.p. lipofection-based suicidal gene/prodrug strategy for peritoneal dissemination of pancreatic cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.