OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of in situ internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting ipsilateral to the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) on postoperative outcomes in haemodialysis patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
METHODS
We reviewed 132 haemodialysis patients who underwent isolated CABG between January 2002 and December 2019. With a difference between the left and right upper arms blood pressure measurement of ≥20 mmHg, we did not use the ITA on the lower value side. We categorized patients into 55 patients (41.7%, ipsilateral group) whose left anterior descending artery was revascularized using the in situ ITA ipsilateral to the AVF, and 77 patients (58.3%, contralateral group) whose left anterior descending artery was revascularized using the ITA opposite the AVF. We compared patients’ postoperative outcomes after adjusting for their backgrounds using weighted logistic regression analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting.
RESULTS
No patients developed coronary steal postoperatively, and there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the groups (P = 0.353). The adjusted 5-year estimated rates of freedom from all-cause and cardiac death in the ipsilateral vs contralateral groups were 52.3% vs 54.0% and 78.2% vs 88.6%, respectively; survival curves were not statistically significantly different (P = 0.762 and P = 0.229, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
In situ ITA grafting ipsilateral to the AVF was not associated with postoperative early and mid-term worse outcomes in haemodialysis patients undergoing isolated CABG.
going isolated CABG using BITA or SITA after adjusting for patients' background information, using weighted logistic regression analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).
Methods
PatientsAll patients previously provided informed consent to use their medical records for research purposes, and the Ethics Committee of Shiga University of Medical Science approved the study (
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.