The aim of this study was to estimate costs accrued by the health care of children with asthma in comparison to children with atopic eczema and seasonal rhinitis and to investigate cost determinants. From the multicenter cohort study (MAS-90), we selected children with an asthma, atopic eczema and/or seasonal rhinitis diagnosis during the first 8 years of life, and overall 8-year health care utilization was estimated retrospectively by reviewing medical records. Asthma treatment (n = 76) incurs an average cost of 627 US dollars per year, 44% due to hospital stays. Atopic eczema treatment (n = 91) cost on average 219 US dollars and seasonal rhinitis (n = 69) 57 US dollars per year. In asthma and atopic eczema, costs increase significantly with disease severity. Allergy diagnostics use accounts for only 1% of total costs. Costs for asthma and atopic eczema treatment are highest in those years when topical steroids are used for the first time, but decrease with every further year of steroid use. A remarkable 25% of asthmatic children with severe symptoms were not treated according to national guidelines, so that most steroid treatment was initiated during the first hospital stay. In the case of asthma, total direct costs increased until the 3rd year of the disease, and then decreased with further years of diagnosis, while steroid use continued to increase. These results indicate a 'learning effect' in the treatment of asthma and atopic eczema for each patient as well as considerable cost-saving potential by preventing severe asthma. Moreover, the importance of considering cost-driving factors and using cohort or longitudinal designs in cost-of-illness approaches is emphasized.

Rising pharmaceutical expenditure has become a major concern for policy makers in Germany over recent years. Therefore, the pharmaceutical market has been increasingly targeted by different kinds of regulation, focussing on both the supply and the demand side, using price, volume and spending controls. Specific regulations include price reductions, reference pricing, pharmacy rebates for sickness funds, increasing co-payments, an 'autidem' substitution, parallel imports, a negative list, directives, and finally, spending caps for pharmaceutical expenditure per physicians' association. Although it is difficult to attribute certain effects to single measures, some measures like reference pricing and physician spending caps are more effective and long-lasting than others. In spite of being opposed by physicians, the spending caps applied between 1993 and 2001 have limited pharmaceutical expenditure for an entire decade. However, while some measures do effectively control expenditures, their effect on allocative efficiency may be detrimental.

This paper analyses the influence of recent German health care reforms, the Statutory Health Insurance Modernization Act 2004 and the Statutory Health Insurance Competition Strengthening Act 2007, on different dimensions of access and choice. More specifically, we look at and discuss the effects of these policies on the availability, reachability and affordability of health care as well as on their impact on consumers' choice of insurers and providers. Generally, patients in Germany enjoy a high degree of free access and a lot of freedom to choose, partly leading to over- and misuse of health services. Concerning choice of insurers, one result of our analysis is that in the statutory health insurance system, the introduction of a greater variety of benefit packages will develop into an additional parameter of choice. In contrast to that, insurees more and more accept certain restrictions of choice and direct access to providers by enrolling into new forms of care (such as gatekeeping-, disease management- and integrated care programmes). However, they might benefit from better quality of care and more options for products and services that best fit their needs.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract