Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), a devastating respiratory illness caused by SARS-associated coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has already affected over 64 million people and caused 1.48 million deaths, just 12 months from the first diagnosis. COVID-19 patients develop serious complications, including severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and or multiorgan failure due to exaggerated host immune response following infection. Currently, drugs that were effective against SARS-CoV are being repurposed for SARS-CoV-2. During this public health emergency, food nutraceuticals could be promising prophylactic therapeutics for COVID-19. Curcumin, a bioactive compound in turmeric, exerts diverse pharmacological activities and is widely used in foods and traditional medicines. This review presents several lines of evidence, which suggest curcumin as a promising prophylactic, therapeutic candidate for COVID-19. First, curcumin exerts antiviral activity against many types of enveloped viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, by multiple mechanisms: direct interaction with viral membrane proteins; disruption of the viral envelope; inhibition of viral proteases; induce host antiviral responses. Second, curcumin protects from lethal pneumonia and ARDS via targeting NF-κB, inflammasome, IL-6 trans signal, and HMGB1 pathways. Third, curcumin is safe and well-tolerated in both healthy and diseased human subjects. In conclusion, accumulated evidence indicates that curcumin may be a potential prophylactic therapeutic for COVID-19 in the clinic and public health settings.

Allergen specific immunotherapy has been shown to be the only effective treatment for long- lasting clinical benefit to IgE-mediated allergic diseases, but a fewer than 5% of patients choose the treatment because of inconvenience and a high risk of anaphylaxis. Recently, epicutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy (EPIT) has proven effective, yet with limitations owing to strong skin reactions. We demonstrate here safer and faster EPIT, named μEPIT, by delivering powdered allergen and adjuvants into many micropores in the epidermis. We fabricated a microarray patch fractionally coated with a powder mixture of ovalbumin (OVA) model allergen, CpG, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (VD3). Topical application of the patch onto laser- microperforated skin resulted in a high level of epidermal delivery while greatly minimizing allergen leakage into circulation system as compared to current subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Moreover, only three times of μEPIT over two weeks could sufficiently inhibit allergen- specific IgE responses in mice suffering OVA-induced airway hyperresponsivness (AHR), which was unattainable by eight times of SCIT over three weeks. Mechanistically, μEPIT preferably enhanced IgG2a production suggesting TH1-biased immune responses and induced a high level of T-regulatory (Treg) cells against repeated allergen sensitization. The immune tolerance was confirmed by marked reduction in airway wall thickness as well as eosinophil and neutrophil infiltration into the respiratory airway. The μEPIT represents a novel and painless technology to treat IgE-mediated allergic diseases with little local skin reaction and a minimal risk of anaphylaxis.

Background: More effective and safer immunotherapies to manage peanut allergy are in great demand despite extensive investigation of sublingual/oral immunotherapy and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) currently in the clinics. Objective: We sought to develop a powder-laden, dissolvable microneedle array (PLD-MNA) for epidermal delivery of powdered allergens and to evaluate the efficacy of this novel EPIT in peanut-sensitized mice. Methods: PLD-MNA was packaged with a mixture of powdered peanut allergen (PNA), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 (VD3), and CpG. Its epidermal delivery and therapeutic efficacy were evaluated alongside PNA-specific forkhead box P3-positive regulatory T cells and IL-10 1 and TGF-b1 1 skin-resident macrophages. Results: PLD-MNA was successfully laden with PNA/VD3/CpG powder and capable of epidermal delivery of most of its content 1 hour after application onto intact mouse skin concomitant with no significant leakage into the circulation or skin irritation. PLD-MNA-mediated EPIT substantially reduced clinical allergy scores to 1 from 3.5 in sham control mice (P < .001) after 6 treatments accompanied by lower levels of PNA-specific IgE and intestinal mucosal mast cells and

Proteasome inhibition (PI) has been reported to interfere with antibody-driven autoimmune diseases. The impact of PI on the allergic immune response and on skin diseases like atopic dermatitis (AD) has not been thoroughly explored, however. Here, we examined whether the PI bortezomib interferes with the allergic immune response and the severity of AD by using an established mouse model of allergen-driven dermatitis, to which bortezomib was applied after the establishment of systemic sensitization to ovalbumin. The treatment indeed resulted in a remarkable decrease in total and allergen-specific plasma cells/antibody-secreting cells, as evidenced by flow cytometry and ELISpot, respectively. This was accompanied by rapid reductions in serum antibody titres, including a prominent reduction of the IgE isotype. CD4+ and CD8+ cells were greatly diminished in lesional skin on immunohistological staining. The impressive effects at the level of immune modulation did not result in any improvement in the eczema, however. Following up on this unexpected result, we found that the skin itself was susceptible to bortezomib, by which it was instructed to lower the expression of critical skin barrier genes, especially transglutaminase-1 and filaggrin. Together, bortezomib eliminates plasma cells and decreases immunoglobulin responses, including allergenic IgE. Although anti-inflammatory effects are detectable in the skin, counter-regulatory effects from PI on resident skin cells likely undermine improvement in the eczema. These results caution against the therapeutic use of bortezomib for inflammatory skin disorders, which are characterized by inherently impaired barrier function, especially AD.

No abstract

Topical gel reduces pesticide-induced systemic acetylcholinesterase inhibition, thus preventing neuronal dysfunction and mortality.

Candida albicans, an opportunistic fungal pathogen, frequently colonizes immune-compromised patients and causes mild to severe systemic reactions. Only few antifungal drugs are currently in use for therapeutic treatment. However, evolution of a drug-resistant C. albicans fungal pathogen is of major concern in the treatment of patients, hence the clinical need for novel drug design and development. In this study, in vitro screening of novel putative pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoline derivatives as the lead drug targets and in silico prediction of the binding potential of these lead molecules against C. albicans pathogenic proteins, such as secreted aspartic protease 3 (SAP3; 2H6T), surface protein β-glucanase (3N9K) and sterol 14-alpha demethylase (5TZ1), were carried out by molecular docking analyses. Further, biological activity-based QSAR and theoretical pharmacokinetic analysis were analyzed. Here, in vitro screening of novel analogue derivatives as drug targets against C. albicans showed inhibitory potential in the concentration of 0.4 µg for BQ-06, 07 and 08, 0.8 µg for BQ-01, 03, and 05, 1.6 µg for BQ-04 and 12.5 µg for BQ-02 in comparison to the standard antifungal drug fluconazole in the concentration of 30 µg. Further, in silico analysis of BQ-01, 03, 05 and 07 analogues docked on chimeric 2H6T, 3N9K and 5TZ1 revealed that these analogues show potential binding affinity, which is different from the therapeutic antifungal drug fluconazole. In addition, these molecules possess good drug-like properties based on the determination of conceptual Density Functional Theory (DFT)-based descriptors, QSAR and pharmacokinetics. Thus, the study offers significant insight into employing pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoline analogues as novel antifungal agents against C. albicans that warrants further investigation.

Food allergy is a common health problem and can cause anaphylaxis. Avoidance of the offending food allergen is still the mainstay therapeutic approach. In this study, we investigated the role of plasma cell reduction by proteasome inhibition in a murine model of food allergy and examined the impact of this treatment on the systemic and local immune response. For this purpose, intestinal anaphylaxis was induced in BALB/c mice with the food allergen hazelnut, in conjunction with different adjuvants (alum and Staphylococcal enterotoxin B SEB) and different administration routes (oral and intraperitoneal). In both models, allergy symptoms were observed, but the clinical severity was more pronounced in the hazelnut-alum model than in the hazelnut-SEB model. Accordingly, allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) against hazelnut was detectable, and mast cell protease-1 in serum was increased after allergen provocation. Treatment with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib reduced plasma cells and resulted in an abolishment of hazelnut allergen-specific IgE, which was associated with amelioration of clinical symptoms as well as a significant decrease in both CD19 + and follicular B lymphocytes. Our data demonstrate the importance of allergen-specific IgE in food allergy and point to B cells as potential therapeutic targets for its treatment. Keywords: Anaphylaxis B cells Food allergy Immunoglobulin E Proteasome inhibitionAdditional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web-site IntroductionAllergic reactions to food are common, and in most cases are caused by type 1-mediated hypersensitivity reactions [1]. Severe cases of food allergy may result in anaphylaxis, which can be fatal [1,2]. Features of food allergy include sensitization paramCorrespondence: Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Margitta Worm e-mail: margitta.worm@charite.de eters, such as the presence of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), and typical clinical symptoms. These frequently consist of skin symptoms, such as urticaria and/or angioedema, but also include variable systemic responses, such as respiratory and cardiovascular symptoms [1][2][3]. Until now, the primary therapeutic approach for patients with food allergy has been strict avoidance of the offending food allergen [1]. Hazelnut (Corylus avellana) is a common cause of food allergy in Europe [4][5][6][7], and affects 0.1-0.5% of the population [8]. Hazelnut-allergic Eur. J. Immunol. 2016. 46: 1727-1736 a risk of severe or even fatal reactions [4][5][6]. Although sublingual immunotherapy and/or oral tolerance-induction has recently been shown to be effective for the treatment of peanut-allergic patients [9,10], their use in clinical practice is limited and currently restricted to specialized centers because of the risk of severe side effects. Another therapeutic approach to treat food allergy is the depletion of IgE. Indeed, the efficacy of an anti-IgE treatment has been demonstrated in patients suffering from food allergy [11]. Likewise, the anti-Ig...