Immigrant children in the US often learn English before their adult caretakers, leading them to take on the role of day-to-day translators (“language brokers”). This study explores the familial socialization of immigrant, linguistic-minority families in the US by drawing on deductive-inductive thematic analysis of fourteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews with Asian-American and Latinx young adult language brokers reflecting on how this role shaped their childhoods and prepared them for their adulthoods. The bulk of interviewees experienced working-class childhoods. Despite this, respondents seemed to have experienced a family socialization model that reflected elements of both middle-class and working-class models. “Immigrant Linguistic Maturation” (ILM) consists of linguistic scaffolding in English and heritage languages, requisite verbal airtime, and engagement with authority figures while also leading children to hold adult knowledge, roles, and responsibilities. Racial and ethnic differences across brokers primarily lie in the actors involved in ILM socialization processes. Extended family, and especially grandparents, played a more active role in the ILM socialization of Asian-American brokers while in the case of Latinx brokers ILM socialization was primarily driven by parents, and in particular, mothers. The case of Asian American and Latinx language brokers calls attention to the importance of factors like immigrant background and linguistic marginalization in shaping familial socialization.
Research on instability has focused on how discrete, unitary forms of instability, like residential or household change, hurt families. Similarly, unauthorized legal status is associated with negative outcomes for immigrant families. There has been less exploration of how the experience of instability changes when those experiencing it, must also contend with undocumented status. Thematic analysis of 50 semi-structured interviews with undocumented and DACA-recipient immigrants suggests that respondents and their families experience “nested instability”, the interaction and compounding of nation-state, residential, and household transitions. This nested form of instability simultaneously destabilize immigrant lives at both the national and household societal levels. In addition, lacking a regular legal status hurt respondents’ ability to cope with nested instability by restricting access to economic resources, institutions and services, and deportation protection. Future research on instability and mixed-status families should consider the form of instability that these families face and how it complicates the process of adapting to a changing national context. Immigration policy and services should also consider the many components of nested instability to better serve migrant families.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.