No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Overeating and increases in body and fat mass are the most common responses to day-to-day stress in humans, whereas stressed laboratory rats and mice respond oppositely. Group housing of Syrian hamsters increases body mass, adiposity, and food intake, perhaps due to social confrontation-induced stress. In experiment 1 we asked, Does repeated social defeat increase food intake, body mass, and white adipose tissue (WAT) mass in Syrian hamsters? Male hamsters subjected to the resident-intruder social interaction model and defeated intermittently 15 times over 34 days for 7-min sessions significantly increased their food intake, body mass, and most WAT masses compared with nondefeated controls. Defeat significantly increased terminal adrenal norepinephrine, but not epinephrine, content. In experiment 2 we asked, Are 15 intermittent resident-intruder interactions necessary to increase body mass and food intake? Body mass and food intake of subordinate hamsters defeated only once were similar to those of nondefeated controls, but four or eight defeats similarly and significantly increased these responses. In experiment 3 we asked, Do intermittent defeats increase adiposity and food intake more than consecutive defeats? Four intermittent or consecutive defeats similarly and significantly increased food intake and body mass compared with nondefeated controls, but only intermittent defeats significantly increased all WAT masses. Consecutive defeats significantly increased mesenteric and inguinal WAT masses. Plasma leptin, but not insulin, concentrations were similarly and significantly increased compared with nondefeated controls. Collectively, social defeat, a natural stressor, significantly increased food intake, body mass, and adiposity in Syrian hamsters and may prove useful in determining mechanisms underlying human stress-induced obesity.

Arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OT) and their receptors are very similar in structure. As a result, at least some of the effects of these peptides may be the result of crosstalk between their canonical receptors. The present study investigated this hypothesis by determining whether the induction of flank marking, a form of social communication in Syrian hamsters, by OT is mediated by the OT receptor or the AVP V1a receptor. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of OT or AVP induced flank marking in a dose-dependent manner although the effects of AVP were approximately 100 times greater than those of OT. Injections of highly selective V1a receptor agonists but not OT receptor agonists induced flank marking, and V1a receptor antagonists but not OT receptor antagonists significantly inhibited the ability of OT to induce flank marking. Lastly, injection of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), a peptide that stimulates OT but not AVP release, significantly increased odor-induced flank marking, and these effects were blocked by a V1a receptor antagonist. These data demonstrate that OT induces flank marking by activating AVP V1a and not OT receptors, suggesting that the V1a receptor should be considered to be an OT receptor as well as an AVP receptor.