No abstract

No abstract

To scrutinize the current application of building information modelling (BIM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) integration in research as well as industrial fields, the present study conducted a holistic review including a bibliometric exploration for existing articles, specific content analysis in different sectors, and follow-up qualitative discussion for the potential of this integrated technology. The bibliometric exploration is focused on analyzing main journals, keywords, and chronological change in representative research content by selecting 115 relevant studies. In content analysis, the representative integrated BIM and CFD application cases are divided into three different sectors. The functionality, interoperability, and sustainability of such integration in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) projects are described in detail. Furthermore, the future research based on the applications of BIM and CFD integration is discussed. Specifically, the more advanced hazard analysis is proposed reflecting the strength of such an integration. Comprehensive information for the possible hazards in AEC projects is digitized and quantified to make a more sensitive hazard recognition tool which can formalize reduction strategies and measures of potential hazards. As a result, the present review study contributes to relevant research by identifying representative application parts and practical requirements for BIM and CFD integration in whole design aspects, reviewing the current research trends and future direction in detail, and analyzing the major issues, such as an interoperability in BIM-compatible CFD for sustainable built environments.

Since gas explosion is the most frequent accidental event occurring in the oil and gas industry, all safety-related critical elements on the topside of offshore platforms should retain their integrity against extreme pressure demands. Although considerable effort has been devoted to develop blast-resistant design methods for offshore structures, there remain several issues that require further investigation. The duration of the triangular-shaped blast design pressure curve with a completely positive side is usually determined by the absolute area of each measured transient pressure response, using the flame acceleration simulator (FLACS). The negative phase pressure in a general gas explosion, however, is often quite crucial, unlike gaseous detonation or TNT explosion. The objective of this study is to thoroughly examine the effect of the negative phase pressure on structural behavior. A blast wall for a specific floating production, storage, and offloading (FPSO) topside is considered as an exemplar structure for blast-resistant design to focus only on overpressure because there is no drag pressure in this type of obstacle. Gas dispersion and explosion simulations were carried out using FLACS, while LS-DYNA was used in the nonlinear transient finite element structural analysis.

No abstract

The potential risk of explosion always exists in offshore topside facilities that deal with flammable materials. Thus, explosion risk analysis taking into account possible scenarios should be performed during the design process to reduce probability of such terrible accidents. There are several technical documents for explosion risk analysis. The analysis usually includes performance criteria, risk acceptance range, and corresponding explosion design load taking into account explosion pressure. However, this standard procedure is not sufficient to assess the potential risk of explosion, since it is usually based solely on the severity of overpressure. Therefore, more in-depth analysis is required to understand the potential risk taking explosion wave profiles into account. In the present paper, a stepwise analysis of gas explosion risk elements has been performed. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of explosion risk have been performed based on the framework of typical explosion risk analysis methods. In addition, both the probability distribution of explosion load parameters taking into account overpressure and its impulse and their correlation have been investigated extensively.

In oil and gas industries, the explosive hazards receive lots of attention to achieve a safety design of relevant facilities. As a part of the robust design for offshore structures, an explosion risk analysis is normally conducted to examine the potential hazards and the influence of them on structural members in a real explosion situation. Explosion accidents in the oil and gas industries are related to lots of parameters through complex interaction. Hence, lots of research and industrial projects have been carried out to understand physical mechanism of explosion accidents. Computational fluid dynamics-based explosion risk analysis method is frequently used to identify contributing factors and their interactions to understand such accidents. It is an effective method when modelled explosion phenomena including detailed geometrical features. This study presents a detailed review and analysis of Computational Fluid Dynamics-based explosion risk analysis that used in the offshore industries. The underlying issues of this method and current limitation are identified and analysed. This study also reviewed potential preventative measures to eliminate such limitation. Additionally, this study proposes the prospective research topic regarding computational fluid dynamics-based explosion risk analysis.

As a gas explosion is the most fatal accident in shipbuilding and offshore plant industries, all safety critical elements on the topside of offshore platforms should retain their integrity against blast pressure. Even though many efforts have been devoted to develop blast-resistant design methods in the offshore engineering field, there still remain several issues needed to be carefully investigated. From a procedure for calculation of explosion design pressure, impulse of a design pressure model having completely positive side only is determined by the absolute area of each obtained transient pressure response through the CFD analysis. The negative pressure phase in a general gas explosion, however, is often quite considerable unlike gaseous detonation or TNT explosion. The main objective of this study is to thoroughly examine the effect of the negative pressure phase on structural behavior. A blast wall for specific FPSO topside is selected to analyze structural response under the blast pressure. Because the blast wall is considered an essential structure for blast-resistant design. Pressure time history data were obtained by explosion simulations using FLACS, and the nonlinear transient finite element analyses were performed using LS-DYNA.