Introduction In the development of terminology of the lower urinary tract, due to its increasing complexity, the terminology for male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction needs to be updated using a male‐specific approach and via a clinically‐based consensus report. Methods This report combines the input of members of the Standardisation Committee of the International Continence Society (ICS) in a Working Group with recognized experts in the field, assisted by many external referees. Appropriate core clinical categories and a subclassification were developed to give a numeric coding to each definition. An extensive process of 22 rounds of internal and external review was developed to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision‐making by collective opinion (consensus). Results A Terminology Report for male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction, encompassing around 390 separate definitions/descriptors, has been developed. It is clinically‐based with the most common diagnoses defined. Clarity and user‐friendliness have been key aims to make it interpretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty groups involved in male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor dysfunction. Male‐specific imaging (ultrasound, radiology, CT, and MRI) has been a major addition whilst appropriate figures have been included to supplement and help clarify the text. Conclusions A consensus‐based Terminology Report for male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction has been produced aimed at being a significant aid to clinical practice and a stimulus for research.

* At the time of this consultation, these definitions are not included in the current ICS terminology. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE 2. EVALUATION The following phrases are used to classify diagnostic tests and studies: • A highly recommended test is a test that should be done on every patient. This section should also be read in conjunction with the relevant committee reports. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE 6. ANORECTAL PHYSIOLOGY TESTING Endocoil MRI has high accuracy for detecting anal sphincter injury but is second line after endoanal ultrasound. Patients with faecal incontinence may benefit from assessment with MRI, particularly those with anorectal malformations and/or previous anal sphincter surgery. Defaecography may be useful and is recommended in patients with faecal incontinence, who have failed conservative therapies, and are possible candidates for laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. * Consider CONTINENCE PRODUCTS for temporary support during treatment Recent VVF Primary simple Consider Catheter, evaluate weekly Established VVF Primary complex Healed Persistant leakage Recurrence Post-irradiation Vaginal repair Consider timing Surgical repair Consider timing Consider interposition material If small, consider catheter, evaluate weekly Surgical repair 6-12 months Consider interposition material Surgical repair Consider timing Consider interposition material Assess fistula closure & assess continence status MANAGEMENT OF IATROGENIC URETERIC FISTULAE HISTORY CLINICAL ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT* PRESUMED DIAGNOSIS Extra-urethral vaginal urinary leakage and/or signs of ureteric obstruction Clinical examination Urethro-cystoscopy Imaging (Xray/CT/ MRI, US) Evaluate upper urinary tract obstruction * Consider CONTINENCE PRODUCTS for temporary support during treatment Ureterovaginal fistula Endoluminal technique (stenting, nephrostomy) for at least 6 weeks Unable to stent (initially)... Re-evaluate for fistula closure, ureteric obstruction Persisting fistula or ureteric obstruction Ureteric reimplantation (open, laparoscopic or robotic) Healed Long-term follow-up for stricture and hydropephrosis * Consider CONTINENCE PRODUCTS for temporary support during treatment Patient education, adequate fibre diet and fluid intake; regular bowel care, preferably ± 3 times a week

The nomogram quantifies the relationship between detrusor contractility and BOO in men with LUTS. A measurement value <25th percentile correlates with clinical indicators of DU and is proposed as a cut-off value for DU-diagnosis. Higher age, bladder capacity, and PVR as well as lower voiding efficiency indicate DU. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:980-986, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Aims Detrusor underactivity, resulting in either prolonged or inefficient voiding, is a common clinical problem for which treatment options are currently limited. The aim of this report is to summarize current understanding of the clinical observation and its underlying pathophysiological entities. Methods This report results from presentations and subsequent discussion at the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society (ICI-RS) in Bristol, 2013. Results and Conclusions The recommendations made by the ICI-RS panel include: Development of study tools based on a system’s pathophysiological approach, correlation of in vitro and in vivo data in experimental animals and humans, and development of more comprehensive translational animal models. In addition, there is a need for longitudinal patient data to define risk groups and for the development of screening tools. In the near-future these recommendations should lead to a better understanding of detrusor underactivity and its pathophysiological background.

Purpose The aim of this study is to explore whether urodynamics, with the addition of ambulatory urodynamic study (ambulatory-UDS), will be able to better predict and assess sacral neuromodulation (SNM) treatment outcome. Selection of patients is a critical element in achieving optimal outcome in SNM. Quantitative and qualitative results of urodynamic tests are used to justify surgical therapy and to evaluate treatment for lower urinary tract dysfunction. Therefore, these tests should be representative and subsequently offer a correct prognosis. MethodsBetween December 2002 until May 2013 selected patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (storage and/or voiding dysfunction) were included in an ambulatory urodynamic measurement database. From this database, the total subgroup of patients that underwent a sacral neuromodulation test evaluation was selected.ResultsA total of 98 patients were included. Success rate of SNM in patients with storage dysfunction was around 70 %, according to either conventional-UDS or ambulatory-UDS diagnosis. Based on conventional-UDS, success rate of SNM in patients with hypocontractility was 67 % and in acontractile patients 35 %. According to ambulatory-UDS diagnosis, success rates were 32 and 17 %, respectively.ConclusionsThis study shows that conventional-UDS overestimates the amount of patients diagnosed with hypocontractile or acontractile bladder. Patients with reduced contractility on ambulatory-UDS have a lower chance of SNM success. Hence, ambulatory-UDS allows us to select patients with a real acontractile bladder and predict SNM failure. In patients with storage dysfunction, additional ambulatory-UDS does not seem to contribute in predicting SNM outcome.

This study showed that all men with ultrasound DWT ≤ 1.23 mm + bladder capacity >445 ml have DU. Combination of these two tests could help physicians to diagnose DU noninvasively in clinical practice. A prospective independent study should confirm these results.

In adult male LUTS patients, detrusor contraction power parameters-BCI and W max-continuously increase with rising BOO grade. According to our results, it is impossible to determine a single threshold value for detrusor contraction power to diagnose detrusor underactivity in a group of LUTS patients with different BOO grades. The study is limited to men with non-neurogenic LUTS. Future studies should evaluate exact threshold values for BCI and W max in BOO subgroups to adequately define detrusor underactivity and investigate men with other bladder conditions.

Based on the think tank discussion, the ICI-RS panel put forward the following recommendations: the need to acquire normative age-matched data in women to define "normal" and "pathological" values of urodynamic parameters; the inclusion of additional clinical data in new nomograms and the use of this extra dimension to develop clinically applicable nomograms for female BOO and contractility; and finally, the need to take into account the variability of BOO in women when developing female bladder contractility nomograms.