G-protein-gated K+ (KG) channels generate slow inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in the brain. Current opinion suggests that neuronal KG channels are heterotetramers of Kir3.1 and Kir3.2. In substantia nigra (SN), however, mRNA of Kir3.1 does not express, whereas that of Kir3.2 clearly does. Therefore, we have characterized the KG channels containing Kir3.2 subunits in SN using biochemical and immunological techniques. We found that they were composed of only Kir3.2 subunits and did not contain significant amounts of either Kir3.1 or Kir3.3. Furthermore, at least some of the KG channels in SN were assemblies of the splicing variants Kir3. 2a and Kir3.2c. The channels were localized specifically at the postsynaptic membrane on the dendrites of dopaminergic neurons. Kir3. 2c, but not Kir3.2a, could bind a PDZ domain-containing protein, PSD-95. The heterologously expressed KG channels composed of Kir3.2a plus Kir3.2c or Kir3.2a alone were activated by G-protein stimulation, but expression of Kir3.2c alone was not. This study reveals that the Kir3.2 splicing variants play distinct roles in the control of function and localization of some of the KG channels in dopaminergic neurons of SN.
Purpose: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a central role in tumor angiogenesis and is regarded as a promising therapeutic target.We hypothesized that treatment with bevacizumab, a humanized recombinant anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, could enhance antitumor response to cisplatin and prolong survival in a murine ovarian cancer model. Experimental Design: We conducted an MTS assay to examine the effect of bevacizumab on proliferation of the VEGF producing human ovarian cancer cell lines in vitro. Next, the antiangiogenic activity of bevacizumab was investigated by in vivo angiogenesis and wound healing assays.We then determined the toxicity and antitumor response of bevacizumab and cisplatin as single agents or in combination in xenograft models of ovarian cancer. Finally, using the same xenograft model, we examined the effect of these regimens, as well as bevacizumab maintenance therapy, on survival. Results: Bevacizumab had no effect on the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro but significantly inhibited angiogenesis and delayed wound healing in vivo. Bevacizumab inhibited i.p. tumor growth and ascites production in the nu/nu mouse xenograft model and enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin. Combination therapy with bevacizumab and cisplatin for 3 weeks was associated with complete disappearance of all macroscopic evidence of disease. Moreover, maintenance treatment with bevacizumab after 3 weeks of induction combination therapy inhibited recurrence and significantly prolonged survival. Conclusions: Bevacizumab has significant antitumor activity not only as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin but may also prolong survival when used as maintenance therapy after a complete response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
The fourth edition of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines for the treatment of ovarian cancer including primary peritoneal cancer and fallopian tube cancer was published in 2015. The guidelines contain seven chapters and six flow charts. The major changes in this new edition are as follows-(1) the format has been changed from reviews to clinical questions (CQ), and the guidelines for optimal clinical practice in Japan are now shown as 41 CQs and answers; (2) the 'flow charts' have been improved and placed near the beginning of the guidelines; (3) the 'basic points', including tumor staging, histological classification, surgical procedures, chemotherapy, and palliative care, are described before the chapter; (4) the FIGO surgical staging of ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer was revised in 2014 and the guideline has been revised accordingly to take the updated version of this classification into account; (5) the procedures for examination and management of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer are described; (6) information on molecular targeting therapy has been added; (7) guidelines for the treatment of recurrent cancer based on tumor markers alone are described, as well as guidelines for providing hormone replacement therapy after treatment.
Interleukin-8 (IL-8) is a chemokine that recruits and activates neutrophils in stromal tissue and plays an essential role in cervical ripening. Nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) is known to be important for the up-regulation of IL-8 gene expression. We examined the molecular mechanisms responsible for NF-kB activation in IL-8 production in cervical stromal cells. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and IL-1beta stimulated IL-8 production by cervical stromal cells in a dose-dependent manner. Pretreatment of cervical stromal cells with inhibitors of RhoA (C3 transferase exoenzyme), Rho-kinase (Y-27632) or NF-kB (BAY11-7082) effectively blocked LPS-induced IL-8 release. In contrast, IL-1beta-induced IL-8 production was significantly blocked by BAY11-7082, but not by C3 transferase exoenzyme or Y-27632. Pull-down assays showed that LPS activated RhoA, but IL-1beta caused only a lower level of activation. Transfection of the cervical stromal cells with RhoA small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibited LPS-stimulated IL-8 production, whereas IL-1beta-induced IL-8 production was not significantly inhibited by knockdown of RhoA with siRNA. Using an NF-kB transcription reporter vector, luciferase assays demonstrated that incubation with LPS or IL-1beta induced the activation of NF-kB in cervical stromal cells. Activation of NF-kB by LPS was inhibited by treatment with C3 exoenzyme, Y-27632 or RhoA siRNA. However, inhibition of the RhoA/Rho-kinase pathway did not attenuate the activation of NF-kB by IL-1beta. These results suggest that LPS-induced IL-8 production is accompanied by enhanced NF-kB activation through the RhoA/Rho-kinase pathway in human cervical cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.