Targeting neoangiogenesis is a well-established anticancer strategy, however, one of the major problems in angiogenesis research, both at the basic and applied levels, remains the development of suitable in vivo methods for assessing and quantifying the systemic angiogenic response. Therefore, there is an urgent need to adopt technically simple and reproducible methodologies which allow to easily quantify neoangiogenesis independently of morphological parameters. Recently, a reproducible and quantitative method was developed, the directed in vivo angiogenesis assay (DIVAA) consisting of the subcutaneous implantation of surgical grade silicone cylinders closed at one end, called angioreactors, into the dorsal flanks of nude mice. In the past few years, DIVAA has been successfully used in evaluating the inhibition and or enhancement of systemic perturbation of angiogenesis by several molecules. Thus, DIVAA studies systemic angiogenesis and its therapeutic modulation associated to cancer progression and metastasis.It is well-established that cancer progression is accompanied by vascular events, such as the formation and remodelling of novel blood vessels.1,2 It is obvious that tumors need a great bulk of oxygen and nutrients. For the first one million of malignant cells, tumors get their oxygen and nutrients from the host capillaries and extracellular fluid.1,2 However, as they outgrow the host supply they start making their own blood vessels (the so-called ''cancer neoangiogenesis.'' Indeed, malignant cells ''persuade'' the existing host capillaries to secrete vascular endothelial growth factors, to sprout changing direction and growing throughout the tumor. De novo formed tumoral vessels may provide an entry point for metastasis. The process of metastasis formation per se could be linked to angiogenesis perturbing signalling phenomena. Cancer-associated vessels are different from normal vessels and their endothelial cells could provide useful targets for treatment. Moreover, both primary tumor and circulating cancer cells may influence and prepare distant sites for engraftment through changes in systemic angiogenesis. It remains unclear whether vascular perturbing is simply induced by the conditions of tumor microenvironment, or it is a consequence of genetic changes underlying the onset and progression of malignancy.
Angioreactors in the study of systemic neoangiogenesisWe considered of primary importance to study the perturbation of systemic angiogenesis during tumor growth and metastasis, whereas most studies so far have analyzed angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment, focusing on the events that lead to the development of a neovascular blood supply to the tumor mass. Thus, we analyzed systemic angiogenesis in a model of metastatic osteosarcoma. 3 We found that proangiogenic molecules released in the blood flow from tumor cells were able to induce new vessel formation in distal area from tumor site (systemic blood vessels). We restricted the area where systemic vessels grow and can be recovered at the end ...