Caffeine therapy reduces apnea of prematurity, promotes successful extubation from invasive positive-pressure ventilation, and decreases the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The recommended dosing for caffeine is a loading dose of 20 mg/kg followed by a 5 mg/kg/d maintenance dose. However, controversy exists about the optimal dosing regimen and data on serum caffeine concentrations in extremely immature infants are scant. We determined serum caffeine concentrations approximately 7 days after starting therapy with a 20 or 25 mg/kg loading dose and a 6 mg/kg/d maintenance dose in 154 infants with a mean gestational age of 29 weeks. The 25th to 75th percentile range for the serum caffeine concentrations with the two dosing regimens was equivalent, approximately 18 to 23 mg/L. Within the first 14 postnatal days, the serum caffeine concentrations were not dependent on postmenstrual age, weight, or postnatal age, and were in a range that is safe and therapeutic. This latter observation remained valid over the ranges of clinical and laboratory assessments of renal and hepatic functions that are usually found in practice. Routine measurement of steady-state serum caffeine concentrations in infants 24 to 35 weeks gestational age is not required in the absence of ongoing apnea/hypopnea or signs compatible with toxicity.
Conscious or moderate sedation is routinely used to facilitate the dental care of the pre- or un-cooperative child. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has little respiratory depressant effect, possibly making it a safer option when used as an adjunct to either opioids or benzodiazepines. Unlike intranasal (IN) midazolam, IN application of DEX and sufentanil (SUF) does not appear to cause much discomfort. Further, although DEX lacks respiratory depressive effects, it is an α2-agonist that can cause hypotension and bradycardia when given in high doses or during prolonged periods of administration. The aim of this feasibility study was to prospectively assess IN DEX/SUF as a potential sedation regimen for pediatric dental procedures. After IRB approval and informed consent, children (aged 3–7 years; n = 20) from our dental clinic were recruited. All patients received 2 μg/kg (max 40 μg) of IN DEX 45 min before the procedure, followed 30 min later by 1 μg/kg (max 20 μg) of IN SUF. An independent observer rated the effects of sedation using the Ohio State University Behavior Rating Scale (OSUBRS) and University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). The dentist and the parent also assessed the efficacy of sedation. Dental procedures were well tolerated and none were aborted. The mean OSUBRS procedure score was 2.1, the UMSS procedure score was 1.6, and all scores returned to baseline after the procedure. The average dentist rated quality of sedation was 7.6 across the 20 subjects. After discharge, parents reported one child with prolonged drowsiness and one child who vomited at home. The use of IN DEX supplemented with IN SUF provided both an effective and tolerable form of moderate sedation. Although onset and recovery are slower than with oral (PO) midazolam and transmucosal fentanyl, the quality of the sedation may be better with less risk of respiratory depression. Results from this preliminary study showed no major complications from IN delivery of these agents.
We report a 3½-month-old infant with trisomy 21 presenting with galactorrhea in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Endocrine work-up showed a high prolactin level (64.4 ng ml À1 Fnormal: 0.5 to 30 ng ml À1 ). Cessation of therapy with metoclopramide (0.2 mg kg À1 per dose q 6 h) resulted in the resolution of galactorrhea with a decrease in serum prolactin level (20.1 ng ml À1 ). We present this case to highlight this uncommon side effect of a commonly used medication in the NICU.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.