The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Patient-Reported Outcomes (CONSORT PRO) and the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) have been developed to improve the quality and transparency of reporting standards in scientific research. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence for the adoption of CONSORT PRO and CERT by researchers examining the link between exercise and quality of life in individuals living with osteoporosis. A systematic search was conducted to identify randomized control trials published in English evaluating exercise interventions on quality of life in individuals living with osteoporosis. Reporting standards were assessed using CONSORT PRO and CERT. A total of 127 studies were identified with 23 meeting inclusion criteria. "Good" evidence for eight (42.1%) CONSORT PRO and two (12.5%) CERT items was found. Adherence to CONSORT PRO was not related to the year of publication, journal impact factor, or study quality. Adherence to CONSORT PRO and CERT reporting standards is inadequate in the literature examining exercise interventions on quality of life in individuals living with osteoporosis. Sufficient reporting is paramount to knowledge translation, interpretation by interventionists, and clinician confidence in understanding if (and how) exercise is associated with quality of life outcomes in this cohort. Concerns associated with failure to include this information are highlighted.

Aims Reliability and validity of force measurement and task detection by the Elvie Trainer were evaluated against an intravaginal dynamometer (IVD) and ultrasound (US) imaging. Methods Women were recruited from local physiotherapy clinics. At the first visit, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and tone were assessed manually. Women performed two sets of three repetitions of rest, PFM maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and maximal Valsalva maneuver (MVM) tasks in supine and standing, with the Elvie Trainer in situ. Women performed another set of rest and MVC repetitions with a custom IVD in situ. At the second visit, PFM strength and tone were reassessed manually. Women performed two sets of three repetitions of the rest, PFM MVC, and MVM tasks in supine and standing, with the Elvie Trainer in situ. Concurrent US imaging was then acquired during a final set of PFM MVC and MVM repetitions in supine and standing, while the Elvie Trainer remained in situ. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Validity was evaluated using Spearman's/Pearson's correlations and receiver operator characteristic curves. Results Thirty women participated in the study. The Elvie Trainer MVC force outcomes exhibited excellent within‐day and good between‐day reliability, but were significantly lower than IVD measures, and exhibited poor relationships with IVD force outcomes. The Elvie Trainer was able to specify correct/incorrect performance of a PFM MVC. Conclusions The Elvie Trainer exhibits acceptable within‐day and between‐day reliability and can detect the correct performance of PFM MVCs; however, force measurements are not valid indicators of PFM strength and should not be used to measure outcomes.

Context: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is strongly recommended for the management of mild to moderate urinary incontinence (UI) in women, yet the specific elements of PFMT that lead to improvement have not been identified. This gap in knowledge may be related, at least in part, to the lack of detail provided on intervention parameters reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs)Objective: Using three different instruments: the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT), the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist, and the Consensus on Therapeutic Exercise Training (CONTENT) scale, the purpose of this study was to assess the completeness of exercise reporting among moderate to high quality RCTs on PFMT for women with UI.Methods: Two raters independently scored all 65 RCTs (n = 65) retrieved by the most up-to-date Cochrane Systematic Review on PFMT for women with UI, and only those of moderate to high quality (>6 on the PEDro scale) were retained. Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were scored by two independent reviewers using the CERT, TIDieR, and CONTENT instruments.The completeness of intervention reporting was evaluated using descriptive statistics. Results: Over half of the items on each instrument were reported less than 50% of the time. Overall, completeness of exercise reporting was 31% (5.8/16 ± 2.4) on CERT, 47% (5.6/12 ± 1.5) on TIDieR, and 46% (4.1/9 ± 1) on CONTENT. The least frequently reported items were the provider of the intervention, the equipment used, the tailoring of exercises, the rationale behind the intervention, and adherence to the intervention.Conclusion: PFMT parameters are not adequately reported in the primary RCTs that currently guide clinical practice. K E Y W O R D SCERT, CONTENT, exercise reporting, pelvic floor muscle training, TIDieR, urinary incontinence

Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study was to prospectively identify aspects of baseline demographic, clinical, and pelvic morphology of women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that are predictive of cure with physiotherapist-supervised pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT). Methods Women ≥18 years old with SUI were recruited from urogynecology and pelvic health physiotherapy clinics. Participants completed a 3-day bladder diary, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF), a standardized pad test, manual assessment of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and tone, and transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) assessment of their urogenital structures at rest while in a supine position and standing, and during contraction, straining, and coughing. Participants attended six physiotherapy sessions over 12 weeks and performed a home PFMT program. The assessment was repeated after the intervention; cure was defined as a dry (≤2 g) pad test. Results Seventy-seven women aged 50 (±10) years completed the protocol; 38 (49%) were deemed cured. Based on univariate testing, four predictors were entered into a binary logistic regression model: ICIQ-UI-SF, PFM tone, bladder neck (BN) height in a quiet standing position, and BN height during a cough in a standing position. The model was significant (p < 0.001), accurately classifying outcome in 74% of participants. The model, validated through bootstrapping, performed moderately, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69–0.90; p = 0.00), and with 70% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Conclusions Women with better bladder support in a standing position and less severe symptoms were most likely to be cured with PFMT. Clinical trial registration #NCT01602107.

No abstract