Introduction: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) therapy is the standard of care provided to patients with metastatic prostate cancer. While effective, it results in sequelae, such as loss of skeletal muscle mass. In this study, we compared the sarcopenic effects of abiraterone and enzalutamide, two ARATs used to treat metastatic prostate cancer.
Methods: Our cohort comprised of 55 patients diagnosed with metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer from 2014–2019. Patients were divided into three treatment groups: gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist alone; GnRH agonist combined with abiraterone acetate; and GnRH agonist combined with enzalutamide. We then compared axial computed tomographic (CT) scans at the L3 level before and after the initiation of hormone therapy for each patient. A skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated for each patient, and alongside clinical data, was compared between the three groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare means and proportions, respectively.
Results: Baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the three groups. The percent SMI change and number of newly sarcopenic patients were not found to be significantly different between the groups. The only variable that was significantly different across the three groups was time between CT scans.
Conclusions: Although we found no significant difference in the sarcopenic effects of GnRH alone, GnRH with abiraterone or GnRH with enzalutamide in our cohort of 55 hormone-naive metastatic prostate cancer patients, overall decreases in muscle mass was observed for all three groups. This highlights the importance of muscle-retaining strategies for patients undergoing ADT for metastatic prostate cancer, regardless of therapeutic regimen.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.