Hypothesis: Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) has been considered a rare entity associated with a grave prognosis. Since 1978, when Liebman et al reviewed 64 cases of HPVG and reported a mortality of 75%, the number of reported cases has been increasing. Design: Case series. Patients and Methods: We reviewed the literature on 182 cases of HPVG in adults, including 4 of our patients, (transplantation and abdominal trauma cases were excluded) and analyzed the cause, pathogenesis, and clinical features. Results: In this series, the underlying clinical events associated with HPVG were bowel necrosis (43%), digestive tract dilatation (12%), intraperitoneal abscess (11%), ulcerative colitis (4%), gastric ulcer (4%), Crohn disease (4%), complications of endoscopic procedures (4%), intraperitoneal tumor (3%), and other (15%). The overall mortality was 39% but varied depending on the underlying disease. Conclusions: Hepatic portal venous gas is a lethal or curable entity caused by various diseases. The underlying disease associated with HPVG determines the clinical features and prognosis of the patients. The treatment of patients with HPVG should be directed to the underlying disease.

Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) is known to be downregulated at the transcriptional level in adenoma and carcinoma. Recent reports have shown that CEACAM1 is overexpressed at protein level in colorectal cancer and correlated with clinical stage. The reason why colorectal cancer cells re-expressed CEACAM1 remains unclear. The aim of our study was to clarify the implication of CEACAM1 re-expression in colorectal cancer. Immunohistochemical analyses were conducted with CEACAM1 long (CEACAM1-L) or short (CEACAM1-S) cytoplasmic domain-specific antibodies on clinical samples from 164 patients with colorectal cancer. The risk factors for metastasis and survival were calculated for clinical implication of CEACAM1 re-expression. Invasion chamber and wound healing assays were performed for the effect of CEACAM1 expression on invasion and migration of colorectal cancer cells. CEACAM1-L and CEACAM1-S stained with greater intensity at the invasion front than at the luminal surface of tumors. Differences between the long and short cytoplasmic isoform expression levels were observed at the invasion front. Multivariate analysis showed that CEACAM1-L dominance was an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis, hematogenous metastasis and short survival. The Kaplan-Meier evaluation demonstrated that CEACAM1-L dominance was associated with shorter survival time (p < 0.0001). In the invasion chamber and wound healing assays, CEACAM1-L promoted invasion and migration. Re-expression of CEACAM1 is observed at the invasion front of colorectal cancer. CEACAM1-L dominance is associated with metastasis and shorter survival of the patients with colorectal cancer. CEACAM1-L dominance is important for colorectal cancer cells invasion and migration.

NCT00701012 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Small gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (< 3 cm) occasionally are found in the stomach during endoscopy. There is no consensus about the surgical management of these small tumors, although this clinical issue is crucial because some of the tumors show unexpected malignant behavior. In this study, we evaluated the clinical management of patients with gastric GISTs who underwent surgical resection. Altogether, 31 patients with gastric GISTs were examined retrospectively. Surgical resection was fundamentally indicated for the patients with gastric GISTs suspected to be malignant by endoscopy or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The malignant grade of the GISTs was evaluated by the mitotic rate, tumor size, and MIB-1 index. EUS was useful for differentiating benign from malignant GISTs; but by limiting the study to patients with small tumors (< 3 cm), the diagnostic value of EUS was not satisfactory for defining the surgical indication. Tumors that were < 50 mm were successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery. Of the 31 patients, 4 had a relapse of the disease, and 1 of those 4 patients had a small tumor (30 mm). All of the recurrences were classified in the high risk category. Surgery is indicated for gastric GISTs that are > or = 20 mm or are suspected to be malignant based on EUS findings. Laparoscopic resection is feasible and is recommended as the treatment of choice for patients with tumors < 50 mm. Risk assessment can be most useful for predicting recurrence.

Background: This study is an attempt to clarify the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a surgical indication marker for appendicitis.

Accumulation of fat did not affect short-term surgical outcomes except for the duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss in male patients.

In our study, the implementation of clinical pathways in the field of laparoscopic surgeries produced significant decreases in length of total hospital stay and cost while maintaining the quality of patient outcomes.

Background: The level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation for anterior resection of rectal cancer has several considerations concerning oncological outcomes. The primary endpoint of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess bowel function between high and low ligation. This study was intended to clarify oncological outcome as the secondary endpoint. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess in a prospective RCT whether the ligation level of the IMA in rectal cancer influences oncological outcomes. Methods: Between February 2008 and December 2011, 100 patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer were randomized to perform either high or low ligation of the IMA. Oncological outcomes was the secondary endpoint of this RCT, whereas assessing bowel function was the primary endpoint. This RCT was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00701012). Results: There were no differences between the groups in terms of clinical data except for tumor stage. There were more advanced-stage patients in the high ligation group (p = 0.046). There were no lymph node (LN) metastases in the root of the IMA in the high ligation group. The average number of harvested LNs for the high and low ligation groups was 16.7 and 14.9, respectively. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS), site of first recurrence, and overall survival (OS). When patients were in stage III, there was also no difference in DFS and OS. Conclusions: The ligation level of the IMA in rectal cancer may not influence oncological outcomes. However, further large-scale RCTs are needed to conclude this issue.