Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are extremely vulnerable to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and show an impaired immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination. We analyzed factors related to vaccination efficiency in KTRs. In a multicenter prospective observational study (NCT04743947), IgG antibodies levels against SARS‐CoV‐2 spike S1 subunit and their neutralization capacity after SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination were analyzed in 225 KTRs and compared to 176 controls. After the vaccination, 56 (24.9%) KTRs became seropositive of whom 68% had neutralizing antibodies. This immune response was significantly lower compared to controls (239 [78–519] BAU/ml versus 1826 [560–3180] BAU/ml for KTRs and controls,
p
< .0001). The strongest predictor for an impaired response was mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that MMF‐free regimen was highly associated with seroconversion (OR 13.25, 95% CI 3.22–54.6;
p
< .001). In contrast, other immunosuppressive drugs had no significant influence. 187 out of 225 KTRs were treated with MMF of whom 26 (13.9%) developed antibodies. 23 of these seropositive KTRs had a daily MMF dose ≤1 g. Furthermore, higher trough MMF concentrations correlated with lower antibody titers (R −0.354,
p
< .001) supporting a dose‐dependent unfavorable effect of MMF. Our data indicate that MMF dose modification could lead to an improved immune response.
Summary
Five renal transplant recipients were preoperatively treated with transplant acceptance‐inducing cells (TAICs) in a Phase‐I safety study of TAICs as an adjunct immune‐conditioning therapy in living‐donor kidney transplantation. Initially, patients received anti‐thymocyte globulin induction therapy in combination with tacrolimus and steroid immunosuppression. Over the course of 12 weeks, steroids were withdrawn and tacrolimus therapy was minimized. Three of the five patients were able to tolerate low‐dose tacrolimus monotherapy and one patient was withdrawn from all immunosuppression for over 8 months. No acute or delayed adverse events were associated with the infusion of TAICs. Monitoring of the recipient anti‐donor reactivity of TAIC‐treated patients in mixed lymphocyte cultures demonstrated that, during periods of clinically stable graft function, recipient T‐cell proliferation and cytokine secretion in response to stimulation with donor alloantigen was relatively suppressed. Therefore, although the TAIC‐II trial did not provide conclusive evidence of a beneficial effect of preoperative TAIC treatment, the results were encouraging because they suggest that TAICs promote a state of alloantigen‐specific unresponsiveness, which might allow safe minimization of pharmacological immunosuppression.
Objective-To assess the rate of angiographic restenosis in patients with end stage renal disease after elective coronary angioplasty. Design-A retrospective case-control study of 20 patients with end stage renal disease and 20 sex and age matched controls without renal disease, who had undergone primarily successful coronary angioplasty. Control coronary angiography was performed regardless of worsening or renewed incidence of anginal symptoms.
Main outcome measures-Group
The high incidence of cardiovascular disease following renal transplantation is mainly due to a high prevalence and accumulation of classical risk factors before and following transplantation. Future prospective studies should evaluate the success of treatment regarding reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in this high risk population.
Background: We evaluated the impact of the three major genetic polymorphisms of the renin-angiotensin system [angiotensinogen (AGT) gene M235T, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene-I/D and angiotensin II-type 1 receptor (AT1R) gene A1166C polymorphisms] as risk factors in IgA nephropathy. Methods: The clinical course of 107 patients with biopsy proven IgA nephropathy followed up for 6.6 ± 5.8 years was examined. The genetic polymorphisms were determined by PCR amplification. Results: The allele frequencies of the polymorphisms studied were similar in patients and control subjects. AGT-M235T genotype was associated with the presence of nephrotic syndrome (p < 0.05), correlated to the number of antihypertensive drugs agents taken (p < 0.01) and influenced the rate of deterioration of renal function (p < 0.05). Combined analysis of AGT-M235T and ACE-I/D polymorphisms detected an interaction on affecting progression (p < 0.05). ACE-inhibition had a more pronounced effect in certain AGT-M235T and ACE-I/D genotypes (p < 0.05) and their combined analysis showed a synergistic effect (p < 0.01). No association between AT1R-A1166C polymorphism and any of the parameters studied was observed. Conclusions: Our results suggest that angiotensinogen-M235T polymorphism is an important marker of progression in IgA nephropathy in Caucasian patients, especially when analyzed in combination with ACE-I/D polymorphism.
The present data demonstrate that hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis following CsA treatment in kidney transplantation might be associated with a down-regulation of MR expression on peripheral leukocytes. Electrolyte imbalance is reversible on application of fludrocortisone. This observation supports fludrocortisone treatment in transplant patients with severe electrolyte disturbances.
Although kidney transplantation from unrelated donors was performed with a lower HLA match and although the recipients were older, the results are equivalent to living related transplantation. Therefore, kidney transplantation from emotionally related living donors represents a valuable option for patients with end-stage renal disease. Careful selection of donors and recipients is a prerequisite of success.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.