Regulatory macrophages (M regs) were administered to two living-donor renal transplant recipients. Both patients were minimized to low-dose tacrolimus monotherapy within 24 wk of transplantation and subsequently maintained excellent graft function. After central venous administration, most M regs remained viable and were seen to traffic from the pulmonary vasculature via the blood to liver, spleen, and bone marrow. By 1 y posttransplantation, both patients displayed patterns of peripheral blood gene expression converging upon the IOT-RISET signature. Furthermore, both patients maintained levels of peripheral blood FOXP3 and TOAG-1 mRNA expression within the range consistent with nonrejection. It is concluded that M regs warrant further study as a potential immune-conditioning therapy for use in solid-organ transplantation. The results of this work are being used to inform the design of The ONE Study, a multinational clinical trial of immunomodulatory cell therapy in renal transplantation.
SUMMARY Tissue effector cells of the monocyte lineage can differentiate into different cell types with specific cell function depending on their environment. The phenotype, developmental requirements, and functional mechanisms of immune protective macrophages that mediate the induction of transplantation tolerance remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that costimulatory blockade favored accumulation of DC-SIGN-expressing macrophages that inhibited CD8+ T cell immunity and promoted CD4+Foxp3+ Treg cell expansion in numbers. Mechanistically, that simultaneous DC-SIGN engagement by fucosylated ligands and TLR4 signaling was required for production of immunoregulatory IL-10 associated with prolonged allograft survival. Deletion of DC-SIGN-expressing macrophages in vivo, interfering with their CSF1-dependent development, or preventing the DC-SIGN signaling pathway abrogated tolerance. Together, the results provide new insights into the tolerogenic effects of costimulatory blockade and identify DC-SIGN+ suppressive macrophages as crucial mediators of immunological tolerance with the concomitant therapeutic implications in the clinic.
Mouse monocytes exposed to macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) were driven to a novel suppressor phenotype. These regulatory macrophages (M regs) expressed markers distinguishing them from M0-, M1-, and M2-polarized macrophages and monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs). M regs completely suppressed polyclonal T cell proliferation through an inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-dependent mechanism. Additionally, M regs eliminated cocultured T cells in an allospecific fashion. In a heterotopic heart transplant model, a single intravenous administration of 5 × 10(6) donor-strain M regs before transplantation significantly prolonged allograft survival in fully immunocompetent recipients using both the stringent C3H-to-BALB/c (32.6 ± 4.5 versus 8.7 ± 0.2 days) and B6-to-BALB/c (31.1 ± 12 versus 9.7 ± 0.4 days) strain combinations. Nos2-deficient M regs did not prolong allograft survival, proving that M reg function in vivo is iNOS-dependent and mediated by living cells. M regs were detectable for at least 2 weeks postinfusion in allogeneic recipients. In their origin, development, phenotypic relationship with other in vitro-derived macrophages and functions, there are solid grounds to assert a near-equivalence of mouse and human M regs. It is concluded that mouse M regs represent a novel, phenotypically distinct subset of suppressor macrophages. Clinical applications of M reg therapy as an adjunct immunosuppressive therapy are currently being investigated within The ONE Study.
Summary Five renal transplant recipients were preoperatively treated with transplant acceptance‐inducing cells (TAICs) in a Phase‐I safety study of TAICs as an adjunct immune‐conditioning therapy in living‐donor kidney transplantation. Initially, patients received anti‐thymocyte globulin induction therapy in combination with tacrolimus and steroid immunosuppression. Over the course of 12 weeks, steroids were withdrawn and tacrolimus therapy was minimized. Three of the five patients were able to tolerate low‐dose tacrolimus monotherapy and one patient was withdrawn from all immunosuppression for over 8 months. No acute or delayed adverse events were associated with the infusion of TAICs. Monitoring of the recipient anti‐donor reactivity of TAIC‐treated patients in mixed lymphocyte cultures demonstrated that, during periods of clinically stable graft function, recipient T‐cell proliferation and cytokine secretion in response to stimulation with donor alloantigen was relatively suppressed. Therefore, although the TAIC‐II trial did not provide conclusive evidence of a beneficial effect of preoperative TAIC treatment, the results were encouraging because they suggest that TAICs promote a state of alloantigen‐specific unresponsiveness, which might allow safe minimization of pharmacological immunosuppression.
Key Points Novel GM-CSF signaling pathways through IFN-γR/IRF-1 and AKT/mTOR provide monocyte licensing for suppressor function. Only licensed but not fresh Ly-6Chigh murine or human CD14+ monocytes secrete nitric oxide or IDO for T-cell suppression.
Summary The transplant acceptance‐inducing cell (TAIC) is a type of immunoregulatory macrophage with the capacity to specifically dampen allogeneic rejection responses to a degree allowing safe minimization of conventional immunosuppressive therapy. In the first part of this report, the production and phenotype of the human TAIC is described. In the second part, an analysis is given of the TAIC‐I clinical trial, in which 12 recipients of renal transplants from deceased donors were treated with donor‐derived TAICs as an adjunct immune‐conditioning therapy. Conventional immunosuppression was gradually withdrawn from 10 of these 12 patients over a period of 8 weeks, starting in the fourth week after transplantation. All but two patients tolerated cessation of steroid therapy, while the remaining eight patients were first weaned from sirolimus and then, in six cases, were also weaned to low‐dose tacrolimus monotherapy. It is concluded that TAIC therapy is both safe and clinically practicable; however, the TAIC‐I trial was unable to provide evidence that postoperative TAIC administration has a beneficial effect.
Human regulatory macrophages (Mreg) have shown early clinical promise as a cell-based adjunct immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation. It is hypothesised that recipient CD4+ T cell responses are actively regulated through direct allorecognition of donor-derived Mregs. Here we show that human Mregs convert allogeneic CD4+ T cells to IL-10-producing, TIGIT+ FoxP3+-induced regulatory T cells that non-specifically suppress bystander T cells and inhibit dendritic cell maturation. Differentiation of Mreg-induced Tregs relies on multiple non-redundant mechanisms that are not exclusive to interaction of Mregs and T cells, including signals mediated by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, TGF-β, retinoic acid, Notch and progestagen-associated endometrial protein. Preoperative administration of donor-derived Mregs to living-donor kidney transplant recipients results in an acute increase in circulating TIGIT+ Tregs. These results suggest a feed-forward mechanism by which Mreg treatment promotes allograft acceptance through rapid induction of direct-pathway Tregs.
Regulatory macrophages (M regs) are a novel type of suppressor macrophage which may be a particularly suitable cell for inducing tolerance of solid organ transplants. In this article, we provide a detailed description of the generation of human M regs from peripheral blood monocytes and methods for the assessment of their phenotype. The uniqueness of the human M reg is best appreciated when the M reg is compared to macrophages in other states of activation; therefore, protocols are provided for generating five comparator macrophage types which have been used as cell type-specificity controls in our work.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.