Neurotransmitter release in the nucleus accumbens core (NACore) during the acquisition of remifentanil or cocaine reinforcement was determined in an operant runway procedure by simultaneous tandem mass spectrometric analysis of dopamine, acetylcholine, and remifentanil or cocaine itself. Run times for remifentanil or cocaine continually decreased over the five consecutive runs of the experiment. Intra-NACore dopamine, acetylcholine, and drug peaked with each intravenous remifentanil or cocaine self-administration and decreased to pre-run baseline with half-lives of ϳ10 min. As expected, remifentanil or cocaine peaks did not vary between the five runs. Surprisingly, however, drug-contingent dopamine peaks also did not change over the five runs, whereas acetylcholine peaks did. Thus, the acquisition of drug reinforcement was paralleled by a continuous increase in acetylcholine overflow in the NACore, whereas the overflow of dopamine, the expected prime neurotransmitter candidate for conditioning in drug reinforcement, did not increase. Local intra-accumbens administration by reverse microdialysis of either atropine or mecamylamine completely and reversibly blocked the acquisition of remifentanil reinforcement. Our findings suggest that activation of muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the NACore by acetylcholine volume transmission is necessary during the acquisition phase of drug reinforcement conditioning.
Both drug- and food reinforcers produced a discontinuous, qualitative change in the rats' operant behavior rather than a simple gradual increase along a continuum, an effect that could be seen clearly only after a histogram analysis of runtime distribution.
The present study was designed to obtain human data on the speed of intravenous (i.v.) injection of cocaine, heroin, and morphine as well as on the rate of onset of their subjective effects and their duration in order to improve the accuracy of animal and human experimental models of i.v. drug abuse. To that end, a questionnaire was submitted both to clients of a substitution therapy outpatient clinic and to members of the drug abuse research community. It was found that i.v. drug abusers injected cocaine, heroin, or morphine much faster and also experienced the drug effects much faster than assumed by the drug abuse researchers. The time course of the reemergence of craving was also greatly misjudged by the researchers. On the other hand, the i.v. drug users’ self-reports were internally consistent and corresponded well to data obtained in several different human behavioral laboratories. Interestingly, more than half of the i.v. drug users reported that injection speed was not important when injecting cocaine (57%), heroin (72%) or morphine (73%) under conditions that guarantee a maximum effect, suggesting that the rate of the rise in the brain concentration of a drug of abuse is less important for its reinforcing effect and, thus, for its abuse liability, than previously assumed, at least within the time frame of an i.v. drug injection.
Regardless of the mode of administration (i.e., contingent or noncontingent), intra-accumbens RMF peaked in the first 10-min sample and decreased exponentially with a t(1/2) of 10.0+/-1.2 min (N=31). RMF-stimulated DA peaked in the 10-min sample immediately after the RMF peak and decreased with a time course very similar to that of RMF. Crosscorrelation of the NAC RMF and NAC DA curves showed them to be tightly synchronized. Noncontingent single-dose RMF was eliminated from the whole brain with a half-life of 1.1+/-0.2 min and from blood with a half-life of 0.3 min or less. The comparison of blood-vs-brain RMF pharmacokinetics with rat RMF self-administration behavior, either in operant runway (present study) or in lever-press-based operant-conditioning procedures, suggests that titration of blood RMF, whole-brain RMF, intra-accumbens RMF, or accumbal DA levels (assessed with the limited temporal resolution of in vivo microdialysis) does not determine a rat's decision to reemit a response during a multiple-injection drug self-administration session.
Although ‘ecstasy’ (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, MDMA) is, after marijuana, the second most prevalent illegal drug of abuse in European adolescents, animal experimental evidence of MDMA’s reinforcing effect has remained scarce, particularly in the rodent model, raising questions about the robustness of MDMA’s reinforcing effect under controlled laboratory conditions. In the present rat runway study, Sprague-Dawley and Long-Evans rats were given the opportunity to run for intravenous injections of saline or MDMA (1 mg/kg). MDMA significantly decreased runtimes in both rat strains. Thus, MDMA’s positive reinforcing effect can be demonstrated not only across rat strains but also across operant conditioning paradigms. These findings should reassure the drug abuse research community that the investigation of MDMA’s reinforcing effect in the inexpensive and widely used rodent model is indeed feasible.
An individual's drug abuse pattern is determined by a multitude of factors. Among these, simple pharmacological determinants of within-binge drug consumption are sorely underinvestigated. We therefore determined if within-session operant responsing to the ultra-short-acting mu opioid agonist remifentanil (RMF) was determined by blood or brain RMF levels or changes thereof. Our peri-response analysis did not detect any "threshold" RMF level, either in blood or in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core as a deep brain region that might determine a rat's "decision" to re-emit a response during a multiple-injection drug self-administration session. The peri-response analysis also failed to find any peak RMF level, either in blood or in the NAc core, which could serve as a "ceiling" level. Thus, our findings strongly suggest that titration of blood or brain RMF levels does not determine a rat's intra-session operant response.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.