Insulin immunization in animal models induces T-h e l p e r (Th) 2-like antibody subclass responses to insulin and other -cell antigens. The aim of this study was to d e t e rmine whether exposure to insulin in humans resulted in a similar subclass bias of the humoral immune response. Levels of IgG subclass antibodies to insulin (IAs), GAD, and IA-2 were measured before and after treatment w i t h insulin in the following groups of patients: 29 patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes treated with intravenous and/or subcutaneous insulin; 10 newly diagnosed patients randomized to cyclosporin A (CsA) or placebo plus subcutaneous insulin for 12 months; and 14 islet cell antibody-positive relatives receiving either intravenous and subcutaneous insulin prophylaxis or no treatment. At the onset of diabetes, the major subclass distributions of insulin autoantibodies (IAAs) were IgG1 and, to a lesser extent, IgG4. After insulin treatment in the 29 new-onset patients, IAs were initially of the IgG1 subclass. IgG4-IAs appeared later, but at 12 months, they were at higher levels than IgG1-IAs in 11 patients. Responses were higher in children compared with adults and were higher in subjects with IAAs (P < 0.001). Insulin prophylaxis in relatives showed a similar profile, with a decline in levels of IgG1-IAs after cessation of daily subcutaneous insulin. Patients treated with CsA took longer to develop IAs and showed suppressed levels of IgG4-IAs; however, their levels of high-titer IgG1-IAs persistently rebounded after completion of CsA therapy. Despite the presence of IgG4-IAs in most insulin-treated patients and relatives, a shift to IgG4-anti-GAD or IgG4-IA-2 was not found for up to 3 years after the initiation of insulin t h e r a p y. While our findings need to be correlated with T-cell cytokine responses, we suggest that the strong IgG4-IA response in insulin-treated patients is consistent with an enhancement of Th2 immunity, but there is no evidence of subsequent spreading of potentially Th2-associated IgG4 responses to other autoantigens. D i a b e t e s 4 9 :9 1 8-925, 2000
The islet autoimmunity of preclinical type 1 diabetes remains poorly characterized in humans. In this paper, the IgG subclass response to the islet autoantigens insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase, and IA-2 was studied sequentially from birth to diabetes onset or current follow-up in 26 autoantibody positive offspring of parents with diabetes. Islet autoantibody appearance was characterized by an early IgG1 peak response to one or more Ags, most commonly to insulin, at a median age of 2.2 yr (interquartile range, 2–2.9 yr). In five offspring, an acute fulminant β-cell destruction and diabetes onset occurred during this initial Ab response. In the remainder, early Ab levels declined markedly, and Ab peaks against other β cell Ags arose sequentially over several years suggesting regulation and spreading of autoimmunity. Second peak Ab responses to the same Ag were observed in only two offspring, both developing diabetes at this time. Two others developed diabetes with declining Ab levels. Abs of IgG1 subclass dominated against each Ag, and other subclasses, were usually only detected during peak IgG1 responses. The IgG4 response to insulin was exceptional, being dominant over IgG1 in four offspring and in five others appeared and/or persisted after IgG1 levels declined. These Th2-associated IgG4 responses were not correlated with protection from diabetes. The presence of IgG1-restricted responses to DA2 were associated with diabetes development. These findings suggest that type 1 diabetes has an early acute destructive phase of β cell autoimmunity, which may be regulated and which spreads chronically until diabetes onset.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.