-Brucellosis is not a sustainable disease in humans. The source of human infection always resides in domestic or wild animal reservoirs. The routes of infection are multiple: foodborne, occupational or recreational, linked to travel and even to bioterrorism. New Brucella strains or species may emerge and existing Brucella species adapt to changing social, cultural, travel and agricultural environment. Brucella melitensis is the most important zoonotic agent, followed by Brucella abortus and Brucella suis. This correlates with the fact that worldwide, the control of bovine brucellosis (due to B. abortus) has been achieved to a greater extent than the control of sheep and goat brucellosis (due to B. melitensis), these latter species being the most important domestic animals in many developing countries. The long duration and high cost of treatment of human brucellosis reduces the efficacy of the therapy. There is no human vaccine for brucellosis and the occurrence of brucellosis is directly linked to the status of animal brucellosis in a region. In this context, the Word Health Organization has defined the development of a human vaccine, besides the implementation of control and eradication programs in animals, as a high priority. The pathogenicity for humans of B. suis biovars 1, 3 and 4 is well established, whereas B. suis biovar 2 seems to be less pathogenic. Indeed, although hunters and pig farmers have repeatably experienced infectious contact with B. suis biovar 2 (found in wild boar and outdoor-rearing pigs in Europe), isolation of B. suis biovar 2 from human samples have only been seldom reported. Marine mammal brucellosis, due to two new proposed Brucella species i.e. B. cetaceae and B. pinnipediae, represents a new zoonotic threat but the pathogenicity for humans of the different Brucella species found in cetaceans and pinnipeds still has to be clearly established.Brucella / animal and human brucellosis / zoonoses / domestic and wildlife reservoir
An evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay (Bruce-ladder) was performed in seven laboratories using 625 Brucella strains from different animal and geographical origins. This robust test can differentiate in a single step all of the classical Brucella species, including those found in marine mammals and the S19, RB51, and Rev.1 vaccine strains.Brucellosis is caused by a facultative intracellular bacterium of the genus Brucella, and it is one of the most frequent bacterial zoonoses in low-income countries, where the control programs have not succeeded in eradicating this neglected zoonosis. The disease is a major cause of direct economic losses and an impediment to trade and exportation. The genus Brucella consists of six recognized species, designated on the basis of differences in pathogenicity and host preference: B. melitensis (goats and sheep), B. abortus (cattle and bison), B. suis (infecting primarily swine but also hares, rodents, and reindeer), B. ovis (sheep), B. canis (dogs), and B. neotomae (wood rats) (7). The discovery of Brucella in a wide variety of marine mammals has led to the proposal of two new species: B. ceti (cetaceans) and B. pinnipedialis (pinnipeds) (8). Some of these species include several biovars, which are currently distinguished from each other by an analysis of approximately 25 phenotypic characteristics, including requirement for CO 2 , H 2 S production, sensitivity to dyes and phages, and other metabolic properties (1). However, all these tests are time-consuming, require skilled technicians, and are not straightforward, and some reagents are not commercially available. In addition, handling of this microorganism represents a high risk for laboratory personnel, since most Brucella strains are highly pathogenic for humans. Accurate diagnostic and typing procedures are critical for the success of the eradication and control of the disease, and therefore the identification of the different species is of great epidemiological importance. In order to overcome most of these difficulties, PCR-based assays have been employed for molecular typing of Brucella species. However, one of the challenges of using DNA-based techniques for differentiating the various Brucella species and strains is their high degree of genetic homology (16). This article describes the evaluation of a new multiplex PCR assay (10), named Bruce-ladder, in seven different European laboratories. The PCR protocol was standardized previously (10), and the same protocol was used in all laboratories (see the supplemental material). The selection of the DNA sequences to design the PCR primers was based on species-specific or strain-specific genetic differences (Table 1). Each laboratory used its own Brucella strain collection, typed by standard bacteriological procedures (1). A total of 625 Brucella strains were used (see the complete list in the supplemental material). The collection included the reference strains of all biovars of B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. suis, and B. ovis, B. canis, B. neotomae, the B. abortus S19, B. ...
BackgroundSince 1994, Brucella strains have been isolated from a wide range of marine mammals. They are currently recognized as two new Brucella species, B. pinnipedialis for the pinniped isolates and B. ceti for the cetacean isolates in agreement with host preference and specific phenotypic and molecular markers. In order to investigate the genetic relationships within the marine mammal Brucella isolates and with reference to terrestrial mammal Brucella isolates, we applied in this study the Multiple Loci VNTR (Variable Number of Tandem Repeats) Analysis (MLVA) approach. A previously published assay comprising 16 loci (MLVA-16) that has been shown to be highly relevant and efficient for typing and clustering Brucella strains from animal and human origin was used.Results294 marine mammal Brucella strains collected in European waters from 173 animals and a human isolate from New Zealand presumably from marine origin were investigated by MLVA-16. Marine mammal Brucella isolates were shown to be different from the recognized terrestrial mammal Brucella species and biovars and corresponded to 3 major related groups, one specific of the B. ceti strains, one of the B. pinnipedialis strains and the last composed of the human isolate. In the B. ceti group, 3 subclusters were identified, distinguishing a cluster of dolphin, minke whale and porpoise isolates and two clusters mostly composed of dolphin isolates. These results were in accordance with published analyses using other phenotypic or molecular approaches, or different panels of VNTR loci. The B. pinnipedialis group could be similarly subdivided in 3 subclusters, one composed exclusively of isolates from hooded seals (Cystophora cristata) and the two others comprising other seal species isolates.ConclusionThe clustering analysis of a large collection of marine mammal Brucella isolates from European waters significantly strengthens the current view of the population structure of these two species, and their relative position with respect to the rest of the Brucella genus. MLVA-16 is confirmed as being a rapid, highly discriminatory and reproducible method to classify Brucella strains including the marine mammal isolates. The Brucella2009 MLVA-16 genotyping database available at http://mlva.u-psud.fr/ is providing a detailed coverage of all 9 currently recognized Brucella species.
Sources ofMycobacterium bovis is the causative agent of tuberculosis in bovines. In addition to cattle, this pathogen has an exceptionally wide host range, extending to goats, cats, dogs, pigs, lions, deer, nonhuman primates, and humans. Many susceptible species, including humans, are putative spillover hosts, in which infection is not confined. Some countries, such as Great Britain and Ireland, are currently experiencing an exponential increase in the incidence of bovine tuberculosis. Moreover, M. bovis
Drug efflux proteins are widespread amongst microorganisms, including pathogens. They can contribute to both natural insensitivity to antibiotics and to emerging antibiotic resistance and so are potential targets for the development of new antibacterial drugs. The design of such drugs would be greatly facilitated by knowledge of the structures of these transport proteins, which are poorly understood, because of the difficulties of obtaining crystals of quality. We describe a structural genomics approach for the amplified expression, purification and characterisation of prokaryotic drug efflux proteins of the 'Major Facilitator Superfamily' (MFS) of transport proteins from Helicobacter pylori, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Bacillus subtilis, Brucella melitensis, Campylobacter jejuni, Neisseria meningitides and Streptomyces coelicolor. The H. pylori putative drug resistance protein, HP1092, and the S. aureus QacA proteins are used as detailed examples. This strategy is an important step towards reproducible production of transport proteins for the screening of drug binding and for optimisation of crystallisation conditions to enable subsequent structure determination.
The P39 and the bacterioferrin (BFR) antigens of Brucella melitensis 16M were previously identified as T dominant antigens able to induce both delayed-type hypersensivity in sensitized guinea pigs and in vitro gamma interferon (IFN-␥) production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from infected cattle. Here, we analyzed the potential for these antigens to function as a subunitary vaccine against Brucella abortus infection in BALB/c mice, and we characterized the humoral and cellular immune responses induced. Mice were injected with each of the recombinant proteins alone or adjuvanted with either CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN) or non-CpG ODN. Mice immunized with the recombinant antigens with CpG ODN were the only group demonstrating both significant IFN-␥ production and T-cell proliferation in response to either Brucella extract or to the respective antigen. The same conclusion holds true for the antibody response, which was only demonstrated in mice immunized with recombinant antigens mixed with CpG ODN. The antibody titers (both immunoglobulin G1 [IgG1] and IgG2a) induced by P39 immunization were higher than the titers induced by BFR (only IgG2a). Using a B. abortus 544 challenge, the level of protection was analyzed and compared to the protection conferred by one immunization with the vaccine strain B19. Immunization with P39 and CpG ODN gave a level of protection comparable to the one conferred by B19 at 4 weeks postchallenge, and the mice were still significantly protected at 8 weeks postchallenge, although to a lesser extent than the B19-vaccinated group. Intriguingly, no protection was detected after BFR vaccination. All other groups did not demonstrate any protection.Brucella species are facultative intracellular gram-negative bacterial pathogens that infect both phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells (42). Brucella abortus causes abortion and infertility in cattle and also various chronic zoonotic infections in humans (8,42). The intracellular localization of these bacteria implies that the immunity against Brucella requires a cell-mediated immune response, which makes the Th1 arm of the response very crucial for controlling the infection (44).Brucella abortus strain B19 is one of the most commonly used attenuated live vaccines against bovine brucellosis and induces high level of protection in cattle (15). The presence of smooth lipopolysaccharide in the vaccine strain B19 may interfere with the discrimination between infected and vaccinated individuals (32) and impair the test and slaughter strategy. Moreover, this strain can cause abortion when administered to pregnant cattle (9) and is still fully virulent for humans (42). In order to avoid these drawbacks, alternative vaccination approaches are needed. Among these, subcellular vaccines able to induce protective Th1 cell-mediated immune response are being developed. Recombinant antigens of Brucella spp. such as HtrA (40), GroEL (2, 30, 34), GroES (34), Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) (47, 49), YajC (52), UvrA (34), and L7 and L12 (37) have been sh...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.