Discrepancies between registered prescriptions and patients' actual use of medications are described as frequent and often resulting in adverse medication events. We aimed to assess the extent of and causes behind discrepancies between medications listed in the Danish national prescription system (Shared Medication Record) and patients' actual use of medications. We prospectively reconciled medication for 260 consecutively admitted polypharmacy patients (>50 years and ≥5 prescriptions) at two hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. The type of discrepancies were determined and the cause of the discrepancies were evaluated as primarily caused by (1) the patient (i.e., intentional or unintentional non‐adherence) or (2) the health care system (i.e., lack of appropriate update of the SMR by physicians in primary or secondary care). There was a median of 12 [IQR 9–15] medications listed and 3 [IQR 1–5] medication discrepancies per patient (total n = 925). The majority (53%) of discrepancies were caused by the health care system, 32% were caused by the patients, of which 70% were intentional non‐adherence, and 15% had an indeterminable cause. In conclusion, discrepancies between medications listed in the Shared Medication Record and actual use of medications were frequent and were most often caused by clinicians not updating the prescription information.

No abstract

No abstract

AimsTo provide posthoc analyses of a clinical trial that reported beneficial effects of medication reviews on health‐related quality of life. Specifically, to describe the medication changes with a focus on deprescribing and to explore patient‐ and medication‐related factors that may identify patients most likely to benefit from medication reviews.MethodsPosthoc analyses of data from a pragmatic, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial investigating a medication review intervention (NCT03911934) in 408 geriatric outpatients treated with ≥9 medicines.ResultsIn the medication review group (n = 196), 26% of the medicines prescribed at baseline were discontinued with 82% still being discontinued after 13 months. The most common reason for discontinuation was lack of indication (72% of discontinuations). The medicines most often discontinued in the medication review group compared with usual care included: metoclopramide (11/15 = 73% discontinued vs. 1/12 = 8% in usual care), acetylsalicylic acid (20/48 = 42% vs. 2/47 = 4%), simvastatin (18/48 = 38% vs. 2/58 = 3%), zopiclone (23/59 = 39% vs. 4/54 = 7%), quinine (9/14 = 64% vs. 6/16 = 38%), citalopram (4/18 = 22% vs. 0/20 = 0%) and tramadol (18/37 = 49% vs. 8/30 = 27%). Factors associated with number of deprescribed medicines included: number of prescribed medicines, Drug Burden Index, patient motivation for medicine changes, and prescriptions of metoclopramide, iron preparations, antidepressants other than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, or drugs for urinary incontinence.ConclusionPhysician‐led medication reviews resulted in persistent deprescribing of medicines in older polypharmacy patients treated with ≥9 medicines. Motivation for having their medicine changed, treatment with more medicines, and a higher burden of sedative and anticholinergic medicines characterized the patients most likely to benefit from physician‐led medication reviews.

Aims Medication reviews can be used to promote appropriate pharmacotherapy and negate the harmful consequences of polypharmacy. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of physician‐led medication reviews and increased cross‐sectoral communication as a supplement to standard care in a type 2 diabetes outpatient clinic. Methods This pragmatic randomised clinical trial enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes treated with at least 12 medications. The subjects were randomised to either standard care (standard care consultation at the outpatient clinic) or standard care plus a medication review consultation and increased cross‐sectoral communication. The primary outcome was the number of medications used after six months. Health‐related quality of life was quantified using the EuroQoL 5‐dimension 5‐level (EQ5D‐5 L) questionnaire. Results We recruited 50 participants with a median age of 72 (IQR 67–75) years. The mean number of medications per patient changed from 17.9 to 14.3 in the intervention group and 17.6 to 17.2 in the control group (rate ratio 0.81). The reasons for discontinuations were medication no longer indicated (60%), safety issues (20%), efficacy issues (15%) or patient preferences (5%). There was a significant difference in the change in health‐related quality of life (EQ5D‐5 L index score) in favour of the intervention (0.111, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.221). Conclusions Physician‐led medication reviews and increased cross‐sectoral communication in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with at least 12 medications reduced the number of medications used and improved health‐related quality of life. Implementing and further investigating similar interventions as standard care seems reasonable.

Aims: To describe the medication changes implemented during physician-led medication reviews that resulted in improved health-related quality of life; and to explore factors that could identify patients with overprescription. Methods: Post-hoc analyses of data from a pragmatic, non-blinded, randomized clinical trial investigating a medication review intervention (NCT03911934) in 408 geriatric outpatients taking ≥9 medicines. Results: The most frequent medicine change in the medication review group (n=196) was discontinuation (26% of the medicines) due to lack of indication (72% of the discontinuations). After 13 months, 82% of the discontinued medicines were persistently discontinued. The medicines most often discontinued in the medication review group compared with usual care included: metoclopramide (11/5=73% discontinued vs 1/12=8% in usual care), acetylsalicylic acid (20/48=42% vs 2/47=4%), simvastatin (18/48=38% vs 2/58=3%), zopiclone (23/59=39% vs 4/54=7%), quinine (9/14=64% vs 6/16=38%), citalopram (4/18=22% vs 0/20=0%), and tramadol (18/37=49% vs 8/30=27%). Factors associated with the number of overprescribed medicines included: number of prescribed medicines (8% increase per medicine), Drug Burden Index (15% increase per 1 increase), and patient motivation for medicine changes (26% less if not motivated). Prescriptions of metoclopramide, iron preparations, antidepressants other than SSRIs, NSAIDs, or drugs for urinary incontinence were associated with a higher number of overprescribed medicines. Conclusion: Medication reviews can be used to persistently discontinue overprescribed medicines in older polypharmacy patients. Motivation for having their medicine changed, treatment with a higher number of medicines, and a higher burden of sedative and anticholinergic drugs characterized patients most likely to benefit from physician-led medication reviews.

Aims: To describe the medication changes implemented during physician-led medication reviews that resulted in improved health-related quality of life; and to explore factors that could identify patients with overprescription. Methods: Post-hoc analyses of data from a pragmatic, non-blinded, randomized clinical trial investigating a medication review intervention (NCT03911934) in 408 geriatric outpatients taking ≥9 medicines. Results: The most frequent medicine change in the medication review group (n=196) was discontinuation (26% of the medicines) due to lack of indication (72% of the discontinuations). After 13 months, 82% of the discontinued medicines were persistently discontinued. The medicines most often discontinued in the medication review group compared with usual care included: metoclopramide (11/5=73% discontinued vs 1/12=8% in usual care), acetylsalicylic acid (20/48=42% vs 2/47=4%), simvastatin (18/48=38% vs 2/58=3%), zopiclone (23/59=39% vs 4/54=7%), quinine (9/14=64% vs 6/16=38%), citalopram (4/18=22% vs 0/20=0%), and tramadol (18/37=49% vs 8/30=27%). Factors associated with the number of overprescribed medicines included: number of prescribed medicines (8% increase per medicine), Drug Burden Index (15% increase per 1 increase), and patient motivation for medicine changes (26% less if not motivated). Prescriptions of metoclopramide, iron preparations, antidepressants other than SSRIs, NSAIDs, or drugs for urinary incontinence were associated with a higher number of overprescribed medicines. Conclusion: Medication reviews can be used to persistently discontinue overprescribed medicines in older polypharmacy patients. Motivation for having their medicine changed, treatment with a higher number of medicines, and a higher burden of sedative and anticholinergic drugs characterized patients most likely to benefit from physician-led medication reviews.

Aims: To describe the medication changes implemented during physician-led medication reviews that resulted in improved health-related quality of life; and to explore factors that could identify patients with overprescription. Methods: Post-hoc analyses of data from a pragmatic, non-blinded, randomized clinical trial investigating a medication review intervention (NCT03911934) in 408 geriatric outpatients taking ≥9 medicines. Results: The most frequent medicine change in the medication review group (n=196) was discontinuation (26% of the medicines) due to lack of indication (72% of the discontinuations). After 13 months, 82% of the discontinued medicines were persistently discontinued. The medicines most often discontinued in the medication review group compared with usual care included: metoclopramide (11/5=73% discontinued vs 1/12=8% in usual care), acetylsalicylic acid (20/48=42% vs 2/47=4%), simvastatin (18/48=38% vs 2/58=3%), zopiclone (23/59=39% vs 4/54=7%), quinine (9/14=64% vs 6/16=38%), citalopram (4/18=22% vs 0/20=0%), and tramadol (18/37=49% vs 8/30=27%). Factors associated with the number of overprescribed medicines included: number of prescribed medicines (8% increase per medicine), Drug Burden Index (15% increase per 1 increase), and patient motivation for medicine changes (26% less if not motivated). Prescriptions of metoclopramide, iron preparations, antidepressants other than SSRIs, NSAIDs, or drugs for urinary incontinence were associated with a higher number of overprescribed medicines. Conclusion: Medication reviews can be used to persistently discontinue overprescribed medicines in older polypharmacy patients. Motivation for having their medicine changed, treatment with a higher number of medicines, and a higher burden of sedative and anticholinergic drugs characterized patients most likely to benefit from physician-led medication reviews.