Targeting the tumor suppressor p53 to the mitochondria triggers a rapid apoptotic response as efficiently as transcription-dependent p53.1, 2 p53 forms a complex with the anti-apoptotic Bcl-XL, which leads to Bak and Bax oligomerization resulting in apoptosis via mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization.3, 4 Although p53 performs its main role in the mitochondrial outer membrane it also interacts with different proteins in the mitochondrial inner membrane and matrix.5, 6 To further investigate mitochondrial activity of p53, EGFP-p53 was fused to different mitochondrial targeting signals (MTSs) directing it to the mitochondrial outer membrane (“XL-MTS” from Bcl-XL; “TOM-MTS” from TOM20), the inner membrane (“CCO-MTS” from cytochrome c oxidase) or matrix (“OTC-MTS” from ornithine transcarbamylase). Fluorescence microscopy and a p53 reporter dual luciferase assay demonstrated that fusing MTSs to p53 increased mitochondrial localization and nuclear exclusion depending on which MTS was used. To examine if the MTSs initiate mitochondrial damage, we fused each individual MTS to EGFP (a non-toxic protein) as negative controls. We performed caspase-9, TUNEL, Annexin-V, and 7-AAD apoptosis assays on T47D breast cancer cells transfected with mitochondrial constructs. Except for EGFP-XL, apoptotic potential was observed in all MTS-EGFP-p53 and MTS-EGFP constructs. In addition, EGFP-p53-XL showed the greatest significant increase in programmed cell death compared to its non-toxic MTS control (EGFP-XL). The apoptotic mechanism for each construct was further investigated using pifithrin-α (an inhibitor of p53 transcriptional activity), pifithrin-μ (a small molecule that reduces binding of p53 to Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL), and over-expressing the anti-apoptotic Bcl-XL. Unlike the MTSs from TOM, CCO, and OTC, which showed different apoptotic mechanisms, we conclude that p53 fused to the MTS from Bcl-XL performs its apoptotic potential exclusively through p53/Bcl-XL specific pathway.

Purpose p53 targeted to the mitochondria is the fastest and most direct pathway for executing p53 death signaling. The purpose of this work was to determine if mitochondrial targeting signals (MTSs) from pro-apoptotic Bak and Bax are capable of targeting p53 to the mitochondria and inducing rapid apoptosis. Methods p53 and its DNA-binding domain (DBD) were fused to MTSs from Bak (p53-BakMTS, DBD-BakMTS) or Bax (p53-BaxMTS, DBD-BaxMTS). Mitochondrial localization was tested via fluorescence microscopy in 1471.1 cells, and apoptosis was detected via 7-AAD in breast (T47D), non-small cell lung (H1373), ovarian (SKOV-3) and cervical (HeLa) cancer cells. To determine that apoptosis is via the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, TMRE and caspase-9 assays were conducted. Finally, the involvement of p53/Bak specific pathway was tested. Results MTSs from Bak and Bax are capable of targeting p53 to the mitochondria, and p53-BakMTS and p53-BaxMTS cause apoptosis through the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Additionally, p53-BakMTS, DBD-BakMTS, p53-BaxMTS and DBD-BaxMTS caused apoptosis in T47D, H1373, SKOV-3 and HeLa cells. The apoptotic mechanism of p53-BakMTS and DBD-BakMTS was Bak dependent. Conclusion Our data demonstrates that p53-BakMTS (or BaxMTS) and DBD-BakMTS (or BaxMTS) cause apoptosis at the mitochondria and can be used as a potential gene therapeutic in cancer.

Because of the dominant negative effect of mutant p53, there has been limited success with wild-type (wt) p53 cancer gene therapy. Therefore, an alternative oligomerization domain for p53 was investigated to enhance the utility of p53 for gene therapy. The tetramerization domain of p53 was substituted with the coiled-coil (CC) domain from Bcr (breakpoint cluster region). Our p53 variant (p53-CC) maintains proper nuclear localization in breast cancer cells detected via fluorescence microscopy and shows a similar expression profile of p53 target genes as wt-p53. Additionally, similar tumor suppressor activities of p53-CC and wt-p53 were detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), annexin-V, 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD), and colony-forming assays. Furthermore, p53-CC was found to cause apoptosis in four different cancer cell lines, regardless of endogenous p53 status. Interestingly, the transcriptional activity of p53-CC was higher than wt-p53 in 3 different reporter gene assays. We hypothesized that the higher transcriptional activity of p53-CC over wt-p53 was due to the sequestration of wt-p53 by endogenous mutant p53 found in cancer cells. Co-immunoprecipitation revealed that wt-p53 does indeed interact with endogenous mutant p53 via its tetramerization domain, while p53-CC escapes this interaction. Therefore, we investigated the impact of the presence of a transdominant mutant p53 on tumor suppressor activities of wt-p53 and p53-CC. Overexpression of a potent mutant p53 along with wt-p53 or p53-CC revealed that, unlike wt-p53, p53-CC retains the same level of tumor suppressor activity. Finally, viral transduction of wt-p53 and p53-CC into a breast cancer cell line that harbors a tumor derived transdominant mutant p53 validated that p53-CC indeed evades sequestration and consequent transdominant inhibition by endogenous mutant p53.

The tumor suppressor p53 is one of the most studied proteins in human cancer.1-3 While nuclear p53 has been utilized for cancer gene therapy, mitochondrial targeting of p53 has not been fully exploited to date.4,5 In response to cellular stress, p53 translocates to the mitochondria and directly interacts with Bcl-2 family proteins including antiapoptotic Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 and proapoptotic Bak and Bax.6 Antiapoptotic Bcl-XL forms inhibitory complexes with proapoptotic Bak and Bax preventing their homo-oligomerization.7 Upon translocation to the mitochondria, p53 binds to Bcl-XL, releases Bak and Bax from the inhibitory complex and enhances their homo-oligomerization.8 Bak and Bax homotetramer formation disrupts the mitochondrial outer membrane, releases antiapoptotic factors such as cytochrome c and triggers a rapid apoptotic response mediated by caspase induction.9 It is still unclear if the MDM2 binding domain (MBD), the proline-rich domain (PRD) and/or DNA binding domain (DBD) of p53 are the domains responsible for interaction with Bcl-XL.10-17 The purpose of this work is to determine if a smaller functional domain of p53 is capable of inducing apoptosis similarly to full length p53. To explore this question, different domains of p53 (MBD, PRD, DBD) were fused to the mitochondrial targeting signal (MTS) from Bcl-XL to ensure Bcl-XL specific targeting.18 The designed constructs were tested for apoptotic activity (TUNEL, Annexin-V, and 7-AAD) in 3 different breast cancer cell lines (T47D, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231), in a cervical cancer cell line (HeLa) and in non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma cells H1373. Our results indicate that DBD-XL (p53 DBD fused to the Bcl-XL MTS) reproduces (in T47D cells) or demonstrates increased apoptotic activity (in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and HeLa cells) compared to p53-XL (full length p53 fused to Bcl-XL MTS). Additionally, mitochondrial dependent apoptosis assays (TMRE, caspase-9), co-IP and overexpression of Bcl-XL in T47D cells suggest that DBD fused to XL MTS may bind to and inhibit Bcl-XL. Taken together, our data demonstrates for the first time that the DBD of p53 may be the minimally necessary domain for achieving apoptosis at the mitochondria in multiple cell lines. This work highlights the role of small functional domains of p53 as a novel cancer biologic therapy.

We sought to uncover genetic drivers of hormone receptor-positive (HR) breast cancer, using a targeted next-generation sequencing approach for detecting expressed gene rearrangements without prior knowledge of the fusion partners. We identified intergenic fusions involving driver genes, including , and, in 14% (24/173) of unselected patients with advanced HR breast cancer. FISH confirmed the corresponding chromosomal rearrangements in both primary and metastatic tumors. Expression of novel kinase fusions in nontransformed cells deregulates phosphoprotein signaling, cell proliferation, and survival in three-dimensional culture, whereas expression in HR breast cancer models modulates estrogen-dependent growth and confers hormonal therapy resistance and Strikingly, shorter overall survival was observed in patients with rearrangement-positive versus rearrangement-negative tumors. Correspondingly, fusions were uncommon (<5%) among 300 patients presenting with primary HR breast cancer. Collectively, our findings identify expressed gene fusions as frequent and potentially actionable drivers in HR breast cancer. By using a powerful clinical molecular diagnostic assay, we identified expressed intergenic fusions as frequent contributors to treatment resistance and poor survival in advanced HR breast cancer. The prevalence and biological and prognostic significance of these alterations suggests that their detection may alter clinical management and bring to light new therapeutic opportunities. .

The oncoprotein Bcr-Abl stimulates pro-survival pathways and suppresses apoptosis from its exclusively cytoplasmic locale, but when targeted to the mitochondrial compartment of leukemia cells, Bcr-Abl was potently cytotoxic. Therefore, we designed a protein construct to act as a mitochondrial chaperone to move Bcr-Abl to the mitochondria. The chaperone (i.e., the 43.6 kDa intracellular cryptic escort (iCE)) contains an EGFP tag and two previously characterized motifs: 1) An optimized Bcr-Abl binding motif that interacts with the coiled-coil domain of Bcr (ccmut3; 72 residues), and 2) A cryptic mitochondrial targeting signal (cMTS; 51 residues) that selectively targets the mitochondria in oxidatively stressed cells (i.e., Bcr-Abl positive leukemic cells) via phosphorylation at a key residue (T193) by protein kinase C. While the iCE colocalized with Bcr-Abl it did not re-localize to the mitochondria. However, the iCE was selectively toxic to Bcr-Abl positive K562 cells as compared to Bcr-Abl negative Cos-7 fibroblasts and 1471.1 murine breast cancer cells. The toxicity of the iCE to leukemic cells was equivalent to 10μM imatinib at 48 hours and the iCE combined with imatinib potentiated cell death beyond imatinib or the iCE alone. Substitution of either the ccmut3 or the cMTS with another Bcr-Abl binding domain (derived from Ras/Rab interaction protein 1 (RIN1; 295 residues)) or MTS (i.e., the canonical IMS derived from Smac/Diablo; 49 residues) did not match the cytotoxicity of the iCE. Additionally, a phosphorylation null mutant of the iCE also abolished the killing effect. The mitochondrial toxicity of Bcr-Abl and the iCE in Bcr-Abl positive K562 leukemia cells was confirmed by flow cytometric analysis of 7-AAD, TUNEL, and annexin-V staining. DNA segmentation and cell viability were assessed by microscopy. Subcellular localization of constructs was determined using confocal microscopy (including statistical colocalization analysis). Overall, the iCE was highly active against K562 leukemia cells and the killing effect was dependent upon both the ccmut3 and functional cMTS domains.

Inactivation of p53 pathway is reported in more than half of all human tumors and can be correlated to malignant development. Missense mutation in the DNA binding region (DBD) of p53 is the most common mechanism of p53 inactivation in cancer cells. The resulting tumor-derived p53 variants, similar to wild-type (wt) p53, retain their ability to oligomerize via the tetramerization domain (TD). Upon hetero-oligomerization, mutant p53 enforces a dominant negative effect over active wt-p53 in cancer cells. To overcome this barrier, we have previously designed a chimeric superactive p53 (p53-CC) with an alternative oligomerization domain capable of escaping transdominant inhibition by mutant p53 in vitro. In this report, we demonstrate the superior tumor suppressor activity of p53-CC and its ability to cause tumor regression of the MDA-MB-468 aggressive p53-dominant negative breast cancer tumor model in vivo. In addition, we illustrate the profound effects of the dominant negative effect of endogenous mutant p53 over wt-p53 in cancer cells. Finally, we investigate the underlying differential mechanisms of activity for p53-CC and wt-p53 delivered using viral-mediated gene therapy approach in the MDA-MB-468 tumor model.

The use of the tumor suppressor p53 for gene therapy of cancer is limited by the dominant negative inactivating effect of mutant endogenous p53 in cancer cells. We have shown previously that swapping the tetramerization domain (TD) of p53 with the coiled-coil (CC) from Bcr allows for our chimeric p53 (p53-CC) to evade hetero-oligomerization with endogenous mutant p53. This enhances the utility of this construct, p53-CC, for cancer gene therapy. Because domain swapping to create p53-CC could result in p53-CC interacting with endogenous Bcr, which is ubiquitous in cells, modifications on the CC domain are necessary to minimize potential interactions with Bcr. Hence, we investigated the possible design of mutations that will improve homodimerization of CC mutants and disfavor hetero-oligomerization with wild-type CC (CCwt), with the goal of minimizing potential interactions with endogenous Bcr in cells. This involved integrated computational and experimental approaches to rationally design an enhanced version of our chimeric p53-CC tumor suppressor. Indeed, the resulting lead candidate p53-CCmutE34K-R55E avoids binding to endogenous Bcr and retains p53 tumor suppressor activity. Specifically, p53-CCmutE34K-R55E exhibits potent apoptotic activity in a variety of cancer cell lines, regardless of p53 status (in cells with mutant p53, wild-type p53, or p53-null cells). This construct overcomes the dominant negative effect limitation of wt p53 and has high significance for future gene therapy for treatment of cancers characterized by p53 dysfunction, which represent over half of all human cancers.