To update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) published in 2011. Four systematic literature reviews were performed regarding the incidence/prevalence of vaccine-preventable infections among patients with AIIRD; efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of vaccines; effect of anti-rheumatic drugs on the response to vaccines; effect of vaccination of household of AIIRDs patients. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated based on the evidence and expert opinion. The updated recommendations comprise six overarching principles and nine recommendations. The former address the need for an annual vaccination status assessment, shared decision-making and timing of vaccination, favouring vaccination during quiescent disease, preferably prior to the initiation of immunosuppression. Non-live vaccines can be safely provided to AIIRD patients regardless of underlying therapy, whereas live-attenuated vaccines may be considered with caution. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination should be strongly considered for the majority of patients with AIIRD. Tetanus toxoid and human papilloma virus vaccination should be provided to AIIRD patients as recommended for the general population. Hepatitis A, hepatitis B and herpes zoster vaccination should be administered to AIIRD patients at risk. Immunocompetent household members of patients with AIIRD should receive vaccines according to national guidelines, except for the oral poliomyelitis vaccine. Live-attenuated vaccines should be avoided during the first 6 months of life in newborns of mothers treated with biologics during the second half of pregnancy. These 2019 EULAR recommendations provide an up-to-date guidance on the management of vaccinations in patients with AIIRD.

No abstract

Need for the guidelineDespite some improvement in survival data over the last 40 years (2;13), lupus patients still die on average 25 years earlier than the mean for women and men in the UK ( 16). The disease can present with slowly or rapidly progressive active disease at any age and can be associated with the rapid accumulation of damage if not promptly diagnosed, appropriately treated and regularly monitored (2;8;14;19;20). An up to date comprehensive guideline to optimise these aspects of management and consistent with current evidence and NHS practice, is warranted to improve the outcome of this variable and potentially life-threatening disease that causes considerable morbidity. There have been no previous UK based guidelines for lupus. The European (EULAR) recommendations for the management of lupus in general were not very detailed and were published in 2008( 22) although more specific recommendations were published for neuro-psychiatric lupus in 2010( 23) and joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ ERA-EDTA) recommendations for lupus nephritis were published in 2012( 24), as well as American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines for the management of lupus nephritis in 2012(25). Objectives of the guidelineThe aim of this guideline was to produce recommendations for the management of adult lupus patients in the UK that cover the diagnosis, assessment, and monitoring of lupus and the treatment of mild, moderate and severe active lupus disease but that do not imply a legal obligation. The resulting recommendations are based on an extensive literature review up to June 2015 to produce evidence-based guidelines, particularly for the treatment of non-renal lupus, supplemented as necessary by expert opinion and consensus agreement (tables 1 and 2). The guideline development group recommend that patients with lupus nephritis are managed according to the EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for lupus nephritis(24) and provide their levels of agreement with a summary of the most important items in those recommendations (table 3). Target population, target audience and stakeholder involvementThe guidelines address the management of adult patients only and have been developed by a multidisciplinary guideline development group set up by the BSR and led by CG, consisting of academic (CG, INB, DDC, MK, DI) and NHS consultants in rheumatology (MA, BG) and nephrology (DJ, LL), rheumatology trainees (MG, KS), a GP (BE) and a clinical nurse specialist (SB), a patient representative (YN) and a lay member (PN). All participants declared any conflicts of interest and these are listed at the end of this article. The target audience includes rheumatologists and other clinicians such as nephrologists, immunologists and dermatologists, trainees in these specialties and emergency medicine, GPs, clinical nurse specialists, and other allied health professionals involved in the care of adult lupus patients. Opinions of BSR SLE Full guideline final with...

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, such as lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies. APS can present with a variety of clinical phenotypes, including thrombosis in the veins, arteries and microvasculature as well as obstetrical complications. The pathophysiological hallmark is thrombosis, but other factors such as complement activation might be important. Prevention of thrombotic manifestations associated with APS includes lifestyle changes and, in individuals at high risk, low-dose aspirin. Prevention and treatment of thrombotic events are dependent mainly on the use of vitamin K antagonists. Immunosuppression and anticomplement therapy have been used anecdotally but have not been adequately tested. Pregnancy morbidity includes unexplained recurrent early miscarriage, fetal death and late obstetrical manifestation such as pre-eclampsia, premature birth or fetal growth restriction associated with placental insufficiency. Current treatment to prevent obstetrical morbidity is based on low-dose aspirin and/or low-molecular-weight heparin and has improved pregnancy outcomes to achieve successful live birth in >70% of pregnancies. Although hydroxychloroquine and pravastatin might further improve pregnancy outcomes, prospective clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.

AimTo present a systematic literature review (SLR) on efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD), aiming to provide a basis for updating the EULAR evidence-based recommendations.MethodsAn SLR was performed according to the standard operating procedures for EULAR-endorsed recommendations. Outcome was determined by efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of vaccination in adult patients with AIIRD, including those receiving immunomodulating therapy. Furthermore, a search was performed on the effect of vaccinating household members of patients with AIIRD on the occurrence of vaccine-preventable infections in patients and their household members (including newborns). The literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library (October 2009 to August 2018).ResultsWhile most investigated vaccines were efficacious and/or immunogenic in patients with AIIRD, some were less efficacious than in healthy control subjects, and/or in patients receiving immunosuppressive agents. Adverse events of vaccination were generally mild and the rates were comparable to those in healthy persons. Vaccination did not seem to lead to an increase in activity of the underlying AIIRD, but insufficient power of most studies precluded arriving at definite conclusions. The number of studies investigating clinical efficacy of vaccination is still limited. No studies on the effect of vaccinating household members of patients with AIIRD were retrieved.ConclusionEvidence on efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of vaccination in patients with AIIRD was systematically reviewed to provide a basis for updated recommendations.

We wanted to assess whether intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) decreases disease activity on MRI in relapsing MS. Previous trials of IVIG in relapsing-remitting MS demonstrated a reduction of acute relapses, but these studies did not include MRI. We treated 26 patients in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study of IVIG 1 g/kg daily or placebo on 2 consecutive days every month during two 6-month treatment periods. The primary end point was the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on monthly serial MRI. Secondary efficacy variables were the occurrence of exacerbations, clinical neurologic ratings, total MS lesion load on T2-weighted MRI, and multimodal evoked potentials. Eighteen patients completed the entire trial; eight patients did not. Twenty-one patients completed the first treatment period and at least two MRI examinations in the second treatment period and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. On serial MRI, we observed fewer enhancing lesions per patient per scan during IVIG treatment (median, 0.4; range, 0 to 9.3) than during placebo treatment (median, 1.3; range, 0.2 to 25.7; p = 0.03). During IVIG treatment, 15 patients were exacerbation free compared with only 7 on placebo (p = 0.02). The total number of exacerbations in the IVIG period was 11 and in the placebo period, 19 (not significant). None of the remaining secondary efficacy measures were significantly different between the two treatment periods. The number of adverse events, in particular eczema, was significantly higher during IVIG therapy than during placebo treatment. These results suggest that IVIG treatment is beneficial to patients with relapsing MS.

No abstract

No abstract