A recurring source of contention between clinicians and radiologists continues to be examination appropriateness when imaging pregnant patients. With the multitude of references on potential radiation risks to the fetus, radiologists tend to be cautious and hesitant about exposing the fetus to radiation. This tendency is often interpreted by referring physicians as intrusion into and delay in the care of their patients. The risk burden of radiation exposure to the fetus has to be carefully weighed against the benefits of obtaining a critical diagnosis quickly and using a single tailored imaging study. In general, there is lower than expected awareness of radiation risks to the fetus from imaging pregnant patients. Modalities that do not use ionizing radiation, such as ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, should be the preferred examinations for evaluating an acute condition in a pregnant patient. However, no examination should be withheld when an important clinical diagnosis is under consideration. Exposure to ionizing radiation may be unavoidable, but there is no evidence to suggest that the risk to the fetus after a single imaging study and an interventional procedure is significant. All efforts should be made to minimize the exposure, with consideration of the risk versus benefit for a given clinical scenario.

No abstract