The E2F family of transcription factors has been implicated in the regulation of cell proliferation, and £2F-binding sites are present in the promoters of several growth-regulating genes. E2F family members are functionally regulated, in part, by complex formation with one or more members of the nuclear pocket protein family, RB, pl07, and pl30. Pocket protein regulation of E2F likely contributes to normal cellular growth control. While the three cloned species of E2F, E2F-1, E2F-2, and E2F-3, are known to be targets of RB interaction, no E2F species has yet been shown to be a specific pl07 or pl30 target. Here, we describe the cloning of a new member of the E2F family, E2F-4, which forms heterodimers with a member(s) of the DP family and, unlike some family members, is present throughout the cell cycle and appears to be a differentially phosphorylated pl07-binding partner. pl07 binding not only can be linked to the regulation of E2F-4 transcriptional activity, but also to suppression of the ability of E2F-4 to transform an immortalized rodent cell line.
Analysis of six endogenous pre-mRNAs demonstrates that localization at the periphery or within splicing factor-rich (SC-35) domains is not restricted to a few unusually abundant pre-mRNAs, but is apparently a more common paradigm of many protein-coding genes. Different genes are preferentially transcribed and their RNAs processed in different compartments relative to SC-35 domains. These differences do not simply correlate with the complexity, nuclear abundance, or position within overall nuclear space. The distribution of spliceosome assembly factor SC-35 did not simply mirror the distribution of individual pre-mRNAs, but rather suggested that individual domains contain both specific pre-mRNA(s) as well as excess splicing factors. This is consistent with a multifunctional compartment, to which some gene loci and their RNAs have access and others do not. Despite similar molar abundance in muscle fiber nuclei, nascent transcript “trees” of highly complex dystrophin RNA are cotranscriptionally spliced outside of SC-35 domains, whereas posttranscriptional “tracks” of more mature myosin heavy chain transcripts overlap domains. Further analyses supported that endogenous pre-mRNAs exhibit distinct structural organization that may reflect not only the expression and complexity of the gene, but also constraints of its chromosomal context and kinetics of its RNA metabolism.
Whether XIST RNA is indifferent to the sequence content of the chromosome is fundamental to understanding its mechanism of chromosomal inactivation. Transgenic Xist RNA appears to associate with and inactivate an entire autosome. However, the behavior of XIST RNA on naturally occurring human X;autosome translocations has not been thoroughly investigated. Here, the relationship of human XIST RNA to autosomal chromatin is investigated in cells from two patients carrying X;autosome translocations in the context of almost complete trisomy for the involved autosome. Since trisomies of either 14 or 9 are lethal in early development, the lack of serious phenotypic consequences of the trisomy demonstrates that the translocated autosomes had been inactivated. Surprisingly, our analyses show that in primary fibroblasts from adult patients, XIST RNA does not associate with most of the involved autosome even though the bulk of it exhibits other hallmarks of inactivation beyond the region associated with XIST RNA. While results show that XIST RNA can associate with human autosomal chromatin to some degree, several observations indicate that this interaction may be unstable, with progressive loss over time. Thus, even where autosomal inactivation is selected for rather than against, there is a fundamental difference in the affinity of XIST RNA for autosomal versus X chromatin. Based on these results we propose that even autosomal chromatin that had been inactivated earlier in development may undergo a stepwise loss of inactivation hallmarks, beginning with XIST RNA. Hence compromised interaction with XIST RNA may be a primary cause of incomplete or unstable autosomal inactivation.
The flat, hooked-shaped architecture of the hamster sperm nucleus makes this an excellent model for in situ hybridization studies of the three dimensional structure of the genome. We have examined the structure of the telomere repeat sequence (TTAGGG)n with respect to the various nuclear structures present in hamster spermatozoa, using fluorescent in situ hybridization. In fully condensed, mature sperm nuclei, the telomere sequences appeared as discrete spots of various sizes interspersed throughout the volume of the nuclei. While the pattern of these signals was non-random, it varied significantly in different nuclei. These discrete telomere foci were seen to gradually lengthen into linear, beaded signals as sperm nuclei were decondensed, in vitro, and were not associated with the nuclear annulus. We also examined the relationship of telomeres to the sperm nuclear matrix, a residual nuclear structure that retains the original size and shape of the nucleus. In these structures the DNA extends beyond the perimeter of the nucleus to form a halo around it, representing the arrangement of the chromosomal DNA into loop domains attached at their bases to the nuclear matrix. Telomere signals in these structures were also linear and equal in length to those of the decondensed nuclei, and each signal represented part of a single DNA loop domain. The telomeres were attached at one end to the nuclear matrix and extended into the halo. Sperm nuclear matrices treated with Eco RI retained the telomere signals. These data support sperm DNA packaging models in which DNA is coiled into discrete foci, rather than spread out linearly along the length of the sperm nucleus.
Conventional chromosome in situ hybridization procedures rely on fixation to glass slides followed by microscopic evaluation. This report describes the development of a microdrop in situ hybridization (MISH) method which facilitates hybridization to chromosomes in suspension. Chromosomes encapsulated in gel microdrops (GMDs) composed of an agarose matrix withstood stringent hybridization and denaturation conditions. Because of the increased stability, hybridization to encapsulated chromosomes was detected by flow cytometry as well as conventional microscopy. Thus, the MISH method offers a means for chromosome hybridization without slides and may enable identification and isolation of chromosomes using hybridization rather than nucleic acid binding dyes. Key terms: GMD, flow cytometry, MISHGel microdrop (GMD) technology (33) evolved from an interest in encapsulating biological materials such as mammalian cells or microorganisms in agarose microspheres. Growth (25,34), secretion (25,26,34), metabolism (34,35,36), cytotoxicity (2,15,35), and electroporation (14) can be measured rapidly in the defined microdrop environment. GMDs are usually composed of agarose. They are prepared by dispersing molten agarose into an excess of a hydrophobic fluid, such as inert silicone oil, to form an emulsion. After the emulsion is transiently cooled, GMDs are separated from the silicone oil by centrifugation and remain physically distinct and robust.Various methods are available to analyze metaphase chromosomes, including flow cytometry (7,17,2 1 ), in situ hybridization (16,19,29,30,31), and staining (3,10). In order to provide stability, chromosomes are typically adsorbed onto slides for analysis. Consequently, analysis requires microscopic evaluation of individual slides which limits automation. Attempts to perform in situ hybridization on chromosomes in solution have been hindered by clumping, breakage, and aggregation ( 1 ). Current methods ( 18) could be improved by increased stabilization. Integration of GMD technology with hybridization techniques provides a system for analyzing chromosomes in suspension, facilitating sample handling, flow cytometry analysis, and hybridization-based isolation.GMDs provide assay microenvironments which are compatible with most in vitro cell manipulations. Our studies have indicated that GMDs can be pipetted, centrifuged, filtered, and analyzed by flow cytometry. The gel matrix provides physical protection, while the small size and porosity result in high permeability and rapid diffusion (35). These properties make the GMDs compatible with enzyme manipulation, fluorescence staining, and repeated washing.The results presented here demonstrate successful stabil ization and flow cytometric analysis of hybridized chromosomes. Development of this technology involved optimization of buffers, emulsion speeds, surfactants and agarose type. Successful encapsulation of chromosomes into GMDs was first confirmed using fluorescence microscopy and image analysis. Protocols were then developed for in situ ...
Using standard cytogenetic methods coupled with molecular techniques, the following karyotype mos 45,X/46,XXq+/46,X+mar (X)/47,XXq+,+mar(X), was identified in a patient with Ullrich-Turner syndrome (UTS). High-resolution banding (n = 650) of the metaphase chromosomes yielded a breakpoint at q28 on the Xq+ rearranged chromosome. FISH was used to determine the presence of Y-containing DNA in the Xq+ and the mar(X) chromosomes. The following molecular probes were used: DYZ1, DYZ3, and spectrum orange WCP Y. The lack of specific hybridization of these probes was interpreted as a low risk of gonadoblastoma in this patient. Using X-chromosome- and centromere-specific probes, FISH demonstrated the presence of hybridizing material on both rearranged chromosomes, the Xq+ and mar(X). Finally, we determined that the mar(X) and Xq+ chromosomes contained telomeres in the absence of any interstitial telomeric hybridizing material. A micro-X chromosome is present in this UTS patient. Delineation of events leading toward the mechanisms responsible for the multiple DNA rearrangements required to generate the micro-X and Xq+ chromosomes awaits future studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.