Background:Considering the increasing trend of obesity, especially in developing countries such as Iran, and the role of inflammatory factors and insulin resistance (IR) in the occurrence of obesity-related complications as well as the safety of some agents such as folic acid and metformin, this clinical trial was designed to investigate the effect of metformin and folic acid on inflammatory factors and IR among obese children.Materials and Methods:In this randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial study, sixty obese children aged 6–12 years were enrolled. Selected obese children were randomly allocated in two interventional (1 mg/daily folic acid or 1000 mg metformin for 8 weeks) groups. Biochemical measurements including homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR), homocysteine (Hcy), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) were measured between and within the groups before and after trial.Results:In each group, thirty obese children were studied. The groups were age- and sex-matched. After folic acid and metformin administration, mean of Hcy, HOMA-IR, TNF-α, and IL-8 decreased significantly (P < 0.05). IL-6 decreased significantly after folic acid use (P < 0.05).Conclusion:The findings of this trial indicated that both metformin and folic acid could decrease IR and level of Hcy in obese children and adolescents. The effectiveness of metformin on IR was more significant than folic acid. Regarding the effectiveness of the two studied agents on inflammatory factors, it is suggested that the role of folic acid was superior to metformin. It is suggested that metformin is a proper agent for obese children with IR and folic acid is an appropriate supplement for obese children with increased inflammatory factors.
Objective: Diarrhea is the second leading cause of death in children. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of probiotics in the treatment of acute noninflammatory diarrhea in children aged 2-10 years in the Pediatric Ward of Hajar Hospital in Shahrekord. Methods: This clinical trial was performed on 184 children with diarrhea. Eighty-six children were randomly assigned to the KidiLact probiotic group and 87 ones to the control group. Patients' demographic information, symptoms, and other variables were recorded in a checklist. The data were analyzed by SPSS version 16 (Chicago, IL) using Chi-square and independent t-test. Results: The mean frequency of diarrhea in the 2 nd and 4 th days (P < 0.001), duration of fever (P = 0.01), duration of diarrhea (P < 0.001), and duration of hospital stay (P = 0.001) were significantly lower in the probiotic group than those in the control group. The frequency of recovery in the 2 nd (P = 0.013) and 4 th (P < 0.001) days was significantly higher in the probiotic group than that in the control group. There was no significant difference in the frequency of dyspepsia between the patients of the two groups (P = 0.331). Conclusion: Probiotics are effective in the treatment of acute noninflammatory diarrhea in children aged 2-10 years and can be used as a safe treatment alongside the standard treatment.
Background and aims: Constipation is one of the most common issues in pediatrics. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of polyethylene glycol and the simultaneous administration of polyethylene glycol along with probiotics in the treatment of chronic functional constipation. Materials and Methods: In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 150 children with chronic functional constipation referred to Imam Ali Clinic affiliated with Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences from 2017 to 2018 were included. The first group (A) consumed 1 g/ kg of body weight per day of water-soluble polyethylene glycol powder and the second group (B) consumed a probiotic powder and 1 g/kg of body weight of the water-soluble polyethylene glycol powder daily. In weeks 0, 1, and 2, questionnaires were filled out by the parents of the children and the data were analyzed. Results: The results showed that there was no significant difference in any of the variables between groups A and B (P=0.07) including the frequency of fecal excretion in week 1 (77% and 71%) and week 2 (4% and 5.4%) and stool consistency in week 1 (4% and 6.7%) and week 2 (86.7% and 92%). Moreover, there was no significant difference between groups A and B in any of the variables frequency of painful excretion in week 1 (74% and 73%, respectively) and week 2 (5.3% and 4%, respectively), frequency of abdominal pain in week 1 (61.3% and 49.3%, respectively) and week 2 (4% and 5.3%, respectively), and the frequency of fecal incontinence in week 1 (22.77% and 18.7%, respectively) and week 2 (6.7% and 1.3%) (P>0.05, respectively). Conclusion: Our results indicated that the administration of probiotic supplement (Lactobacillus Rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillous Bulgaricus) has no effect on the improvement of symptoms in children with chronic constipation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.