This research explores the perceptions students at three traditional university campuses and four Rajabhat university campuses in Central-Western Thailand have of English. The students were surveyed on (1) their backgrounds, (2) their thoughts about English in general, (3) their thoughts about their own ability in English, and (4) their thoughts about their current English teachers. The researchers found that traditional university students had better backgrounds in English. Additionally, most students at both types of institutions thought positively about English and their teachers, but didn't think so positively about their own English ability. However, the differences in students' responses were small and therefore any implications from the institutional differences in students' perceptions are limited.Keywords Student perceptions of English Á English backgrounds of students Á Thai universities Á Institutional differences Á Student evaluations of teaching English is the globally dominant language of our time (Crystal 1997). English has been taught for generations to students from all over the world. Even in countries where English is not the daily medium of communication, university students study in English, in part, so that students can compete in the global economic environment. Yet with this worldwide focus on English, perspectives vary on the usefulness of learning English and the reasons ). It has been suggested that these differences in perspective toward English can be related to a variety of factors including personal attitude and motivation to learn (Masgoret and Gardner 2003). This research examines the backgrounds and perspectives of Thai students studying English and the differences that exist between students at two of Thailand's higher education institutional structures, Rajabhat universities and traditional universities.The present research includes surveyed responses from freshmen students at four Rajabhat university campuses and three traditional university campuses all located within the Central-Western Thai provinces of Nakhon Pathom, Kanchanaburi, Ratchaburi, and Phetchaburi. Random groups of students from the seven campuses answered questions regarding their backgrounds and responded to statements about their thoughts about English, their own ability in English, their current English teachers. The goal of this project was to determine whether there were any differences in the background and perceptions of students who are attending traditional universities and those who are attending Rajabhat universities. Results from the research should facilitate insights into students' backgrounds and perceptions of the English that they are taught and how those insights may ultimately shape the future development of English as a significant component of most Thai university curriculums.This study involved a multi-campus investigation of perceptions of English among university students at two types of Thai higher educational institutions, traditional universities and Rajabhat universities, within the ...
The current situation of international communication in globalization context requires intercultural competence (IC) to achieve successful communication (Crystal, 2003). Concerning this intercultural competence, non-verbal communication (NVC) plays a key role to indicate the success of having intercultural competence. On the other hand, Thai Ministry of Education (MOE) has launched the CEFR for the country policy in English teaching and learning (Ministry of Education, 2016). The purpose of this paper is to present major results of an investigation of intercultural competence, that is, the NVC. An innovative program implemented in this study is the CEFR and project-based activities (the CEFR-PBA). The study also examines Thai university students' attitude towards this innovative class. This paper discusses the IC students learned from role-plays. The participants of the study were 44 students of third year English Education at a Thai Rajabhat University. Research method applies action research and case study (Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Method, 2003). Data collection gained was from 1) videotape recordings of students' role-play, and 2) the questionnaire. Data analysis for video recordings employed a NVC rating scale evaluated by native-speaker raters; while means, percentage, and SD were used for the questionnaire. Grounded theory's color coding (Strauss & Cobin, 1990) will be utilized in analyzing the qualitative data from raters' additional comment. Findings revealed students' NVC performance were both appropriate on body movement and position as well as vocalic communication. Moreover, their attitude towards the CEFR-PBA was positive.
The purpose of this study is to investigate students’ experiences of communicating orally and non-verbally. The participants were forty-four students in their third year of English education at a Thai Rajabhat University. Nine students were purposively selected as the student-presenters. The research methods applied were action research and case study. Data collection gained was from two sets of video recordings of students’ oral presentations. The data analysis employed speaking strategies analysis from Charttrakul (2009) as a guideline, and grounded theory (Strauss & Cobin, 1990). Findings revealed that students employed five speaking strategies in their oral presentation, particularly speaking from memory (100%). Also, the results show that five NVC strategies were employed as a parallel communication tool in all student-presenters’ oral presentation; and the most commonly NVC used was hand gesture (100%). This paper recommends using an oral presentation technique to promote Thai students’ oral skill relating verbal and non-verbal communication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.