Background: Routine use of pre-participation electrocardiograms (ECGs) has been used by the Singapore Armed Forces, targeting early detection of significant cardiac diseases. We aim to describe the impact of demographic and anthropometric factors on ECG variables and establish a set of electrocardiographic reference ranges specific to a young male multiethnic Southeast Asian cohort. Methods and results:Between young male conscripts underwent pre-participation screening that included a 12lead ECG, demographic and anthropometric measurements. The Chinese population had the longest PR interval (146.7 ± 19.7 vs. 145.21 ± 19.2 in Malays vs.141.2 ± 18.8 ms in Indians), QRS duration (94.5 ± 9.8 vs. 92.6 ± 9.7 in Malays vs.92.5 ± 9.4 ms in Indians) and QTcB interval (408.3 ± 21.3 vs. 403.5 ± 21.6 in Malays vs. 401.2 ± 21.4 ms in Indians) (all p < 0.001). Body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m 2 and body fat >25% were independently associated with lower prevalence of increased QRS voltage on ECG. Systolic blood pressure of >140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of >90 mmHg independently increased the prevalence of increased QRS voltage on ECG. Conclusions: Electrocardiographic parameters vary across different ethnicities andin comparison with international norms. In our population, diagnosis of increased QRS voltage by ECG is less prevalent with obesity and increased body fat. Further analysis of gold standard measurements for the diagnosis of LVH in our population is ongoing, to improve the accuracy of the ECG screening process. K E Y W O R D S anthropometric, electrocardiogram, male, norms How to cite this article: Sia C-H, Dalakoti M, Tan BYQ, et al. A Population-wide study of electrocardiographic (ECG) norms and the effect of demographic and anthropometric factors on selected ECG characteristics in young, Southeast Asian males-results from the Singapore Armed Forces ECG (SAFE) study.
Atheroclerosis refers to a chronic inflammatory disease featured by the accumulation of fibrofatty lesions in the intima of arteries. Cardiovasular events associated with atherosclerosis remain the major causes of mortality worldwide. Recent studies have indicated that ferroptosis, a novel programmed cell death, might participate in the process of atherosclerosis. However, the ferroptosis landscape is still not clear. In this study, 59 genes associated with ferroptosis were ultimately identified in atherosclerosis in the intima. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed for functional annotation. Through the construction of protein–protein interaction (PPI) network, five hub genes (TP53, MAPK1, STAT3, HMOX1, and PTGS2) were then validated histologically. The competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network of hub genes was ultimately constructed to explore the regulatory mechanism between lncRNAs, miRNAs, and hub genes. The findings provide more insights into the ferroptosis landscape and, potentially, the therapeutic targets of atherosclerosis.
WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS This comprehensive network meta-analysis used data from 28 randomised controlled trials of commonly used endovascular treatments for femoropopliteal lesions. It was found that drug eluting stents were significantly more effective than drug coated balloons for the treatment of short lesions. However, the overall analysis did not demonstrate any significant difference in the efficacy of drug eluting stents, covered stents, drug coated balloons, and bare metal stent. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone does not constitute an effective choice. These outcomes may contribute to clinical decision making. Background/objective: Endovascular interventions for femoropopliteal (FP) arterial diseases are limited by the development of restenosis. Current drug coated devices are capable of preventing restenosis by releasing antiproliferative agents to the vessel wall. However, default strategies for the treatment of FP diseases remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy differences between drug eluting stents (DES), covered stents (CS), and other commonly used endovascular treatments in FP lesions, including drug coated balloons (DCBs), bare metal stents (BMS), and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Methods: A comprehensive network meta-analysis was conducted using data from relevant randomised control trials published up to 16 December 2018. Primary patency and target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at 12 months were set as the primary and secondary end points, respectively. Results: Twenty-eight eligible trials including 4728 patients were selected. DES was ranked as the most effective treatment in the multidimensional analysis of primary patency; however, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of DES and that of CS, DCB, and BMS. However, in short lesions (<10 cm), DES was significantly more effective than DCB (odds ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.15e0.83). Primary patency at 12 months was significantly lower with PTA. In terms of preventing TLR, DCB was ranked first, followed by DES, CS, BMS, and PTA. TLR was significantly higher with PTA than with other treatment strategies. Conclusion: The findings of this network meta-analysis suggest that this is not the appropriate time to identify the best endovascular treatment strategy for the FP segment. DES is effective in maintaining mid-term patency, especially in short lesions, whereas DCB seems more suitable for clinical use.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
An optimal of 1.66 for LVM in healthy Chinese was found to validate well, with superior clinical utility both to that of BSA-based indexing and to=2.7. The effect of allometric indexing of cardiac function requires further study.
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The efficacy of renal-replacement treatment (RRT) remains to be validated in COVID-19. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of early initiation of RRT in intensive care unit (ICU) adults with severe COVID-19. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Fifty-eight adult patients in ICU with critically ill or severe COVID-19 with a tendency of critical illness were recruited from February 9, 2020, to March 30, 2020. Early RRT were determined by the ICU medical team based on boom in cytokines levels, increased organs injury/failure, and rapid aggravation of condition. All participants were followed up from the first day of ICU admission to March 30, 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality in ICU. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age of the cohort was 68.4 ± 14.6 years, with 81.0% having at least one comorbidity before hospitalization. Twenty patients (34.5%) initiated early RRT after 24.1 ± 10.4 days from the onset and 6.4 ± 3.6 days from ICU admission. Thirty-four of 58 participants (58.6%) died during ICU follow-up. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model showed that early RRT was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in ICU with an adjusted HR of 0.280 (95% CI: 0.106–0.738, <i>p</i> = 0.010). Sudden unexpected death (SUD) was remarkably reduced in the early RRT group, compared with the control group (0.2 vs. 2.9 per 100 person-day, <i>p</i> = 0.02). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Early RRT can reduce the all-cause in-hospital mortality, especially SUD in patients with severe COVID-19, but not improve multi-organ impairment or increase the risk of AKI. Early initiation of RRT merits an optional strategy in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000030773).
Background: N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent non-cap reversible modification present in messenger RNAs and long non-coding RNAs, and its dysregulation has been linked to multiple cardiovascular diseases, including cardiac hypertrophy and atherosclerosis. Although limited studies have suggested that m6A modification contributes to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) development, the full landscape of m6A regulators that mediate modification patterns has not been revealed.Methods: To distinguish the m6A methylation subtypes in AAA patients, an unsupervised clustering method was carried out, based on the mRNA levels of 17 m6A methylation regulators. Differentially expressed genes were identified by comparing clusters. An m6Ascore model was calculated using principal component analysis and structured to assess the m6A methylation patterns of single samples. Subsequently, the relationship between the m6Ascore and immune cells and the hallmark gene set was analyzed. Finally, pairs of circRNA-m6A regulators and m6A regulators-m6A related genes were used to establish a network.Results: We identified three m6A methylation subtypes in the AAA samples. The m6Acluster A and C were characterized as more immunologically activated because of the higher abundance of immune cells than that in m6Acluster B. The m6Acluster B was less enriched in inflammatory pathways and more prevalent in pathways related to extracellular matrix stability. Subsequently, we divided the individual samples into two groups according to the m6Ascore, which suggested that a high m6Ascore predicted more active inflammatory pathways and higher inflammatory cell infiltration. A network consisting of 9 m6A regulators and 37 circRNAs was constructed.Conclusion: This work highlighted that m6A methylation modification was highly correlated with immune infiltration of AAA, which may promote the progression of AAA. We constructed an individualized m6Ascore model to provide evidence for individualized treatments in the future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.