Cryoprobe is a novel transbronchial biopsy (TBB) tool that yields larger tissue samples than forceps. Pathological diagnosis and biomarker analysis, such as genetic alterations and programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression, are paramount for precision medicine against lung cancer. We evaluated the safety and usefulness of cryoprobe TBB for lung cancer diagnosis and biomarker analysis. In this single‐center, prospective single‐arm study, patients suspected of having or diagnosed with primary lung cancer underwent cryoprobe TBB using flexible bronchoscopy after conventional forceps TBB from the same lesion. Cryoprobe TBB was performed in 121 patients. The incidence rate of severe bleeding and serious adverse events (4% [90% confidence interval: 2%‐9%]) was significantly lower than the expected rate (20% with 30% threshold,
P
< 0.01). Combining both central and peripheral lesions, the diagnostic yield rate of cryoprobe samples was 76% and that of forceps samples was 84%. Compared with forceps TBB samples, cryoprobe TBB samples were larger (cryoprobe 15 mm
2
vs forceps 2 mm
2
) and resulted in a larger proportion of definite histomorphological diagnosis (cryoprobe 86% vs forceps 74%,
P
< 0.01), larger amounts of DNA extracted from samples (median: cryoprobe, 1.60 µg vs forceps, 0.58 µg,
P
= 0.02) and RNA (median: cryoprobe, 0.62 µg vs forceps, 0.17 µg,
P
< 0.01) extracted from samples, and tended to yield greater rates of PD‐L1 expression >1% (51% vs 42%). In conclusion, cryoprobe is a safe and useful tool for obtaining lung cancer tissue samples of adequate size and quality, which allow morphological diagnosis and biomarker analysis for precision medicine against lung cancer.
Background
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a potentially life‐threatening adverse event. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the development of immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), especially ILD, was associated with treatment efficacy and to research the features and risk factors of ILD in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods
Between December 2015 and November 2018, 130 advanced NSCLC patients were treated with nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. The patients were categorized into two groups (irAEs group or non‐irAEs group). Subsequently, we divided the irAEs group into two groups based on the incidence of ILD (ILD group and irAEs‐non‐ILD group). Treatment efficacy and the characteristics of ILD were evaluated.
Results
A total of 39 (30%) patients developed irAEs. ILD was observed in 16 (12%) patients. Patients with ILD had a higher objective response rate (ORR) compared with irAEs‐non‐ILD patients and non‐irAEs patients (63%, 43% and 22%, respectively). Median progression‐free survival (mPFS) was 15.9 months in ILD patients, 5.4 months in irAEs‐non‐ILD patients and 3.3 months in non‐irAEs patients (log‐rank test, P = 0.033). Pre‐existing interstitial pneumonia (IP) was an independent risk factor for ILD‐induced ICIs (odds ratio [OR] 14.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.16–99.6, P = 0.006).
Conclusions
ORR and PFS were significantly better in ILD patients than in irAEs‐non‐ILD and non‐irAEs patients. Pre‐existing history of IP was an independent risk factor for ILD‐induced ICIs.
Background: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptortyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) approved for the treatment of patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the mechanisms of acquired drug resistance to osimertinib have not as yet been clarified. Exosomes and microRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in carcinogenesis and drug resistance in human cancers. Methods: We used previously established osimertinib-resistant HCC827 (HCC827-OR) and PC-9 (PC-9-OR) cells. We evaluated the profiles of exosomal miRNA associated with resistance to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells. Results: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenomenon was observed in HCC827-OR and PC-9-OR cells. Microarray and quantitative reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that miR-210-3p was co-upregulated in exosomes isolated from HCC827-OR and PC-9-OR cells compared with those isolated from parental HCC827 and PC-9 cells. HCC827-OR cell-derived exosomes induced EMT changes and resistance to osimertinib in HCC827 cells. Subsequently, the induction of miR-210-3p directly promoted the EMT phenomenon and resistance to osimertinib in HCC827 cells. Conclusions: Exosomal miR-210-3p may play a crucial role in resistance to osimertinib in the tumor microenvironment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
Although a few investigators have demonstrated the effect of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for postoperative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the outcome of this treatment remains unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and tolerability of concurrent CRT with cisplatin (CDDP) and vinorelbine (VNR) in patients with postoperative locoregional recurrent NSCLC. A total of 40 patients who had received concurrent CRT with CDDP and VNR between January 1999 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were treated with CDDP (80 mg/m2 on day 1) and VNR (20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) every 4 weeks. Radiotherapy was administered concurrently during cycle 1. The delivered x-ray radiation dose was 60 Gy in all 37 patients who received x-ray radiotherapy; 3 patients received proton beam radiation (66 Gy [RBE] in 1 patient and 60 Gy [RBE] in 2 patients). The objective response rate was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.9%–92.9%). The median progression-free survival was 20.3 months (95% CI, 12.9 months–not reached). The 2-year survival rate was 78.9% (95% CI, 63.0%–89.1%). The most common grade ≥3 toxicity was neutropenia (18%). No grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis and no treatment-related deaths were observed.Our study revealed that concurrent CRT with CDDP and VNR was active and safe for patients with postoperative locoregional recurrent NSCLC. Salvage CRT for postoperative locoregional recurrent NSCLC might be a promising treatment for selected patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.