No abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of syphilis treatment in HIV-infected and -uninfected patients. An observational study on patients diagnosed with early syphilis in three genitourinary clinics in the UK between January 2003 and June 2005 was conducted. Failure of the initial Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (test) (VDRL) titre to decrease four-fold within 12 months in the absence of history of re-infection was considered as treatment failure. During the study period, 190 HIV-uninfected and 129 HIV-infected patients were diagnosed, and 161 (84%) HIV-uninfected and 100 (77.5%) HIV-positive patients with diagnosis of syphilis who had 24 months follow-up syphilis serology results were included in the study (P = 0.10). There were 381 and 508 follow-up episodes for HIV-infected and -uninfected patients, respectively, within 24 months. One HIV-infected patient was diagnosed with neuro-syphilis. After 12 months, 102 (63%) HIV-uninfected and 76 (70%) HIV-infected patients were treated (P = 0.04). On Cox proportional hazard model, successful treatment after 12 months was associated with having VDRL titre more than 1:6 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.011; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004-1.019; P = 0.002). Those with negative immunoglobulin M enzyme immunoassay were less likely to have been successfully treated after 12 months (HR 0.676 [95% CI 0.518-0.883]; P = 0.004). HIV sero-status, age, sex group and treatment regimen were not associated with success of treatment. In conclusion, HIV sero-status did not play a role in the outcome of syphilis treatment. Treatment failure in a proportion of HIV-infected patients is due to a slower decline in VDRL titre rather than lack of response to treatment.

Since the first cases in December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly spread across the globe, resulting in the COVID-19 pandemic. Early clinical experiences have demonstrated the wide spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 presentations, including various reports of atypical presentations of COVID-19 and possible mimic conditions.This article summarises the current evidence surrounding atypical presentations of COVID-19 including neurological, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, otorhinolaryngology and geriatric features. A case from our hospital of pneumocystis pneumonia initially suspected to be COVID-19 forms the basis for a discussion surrounding mimic conditions of COVID-19. The dual-process model of clinical reasoning is used to analyse the thought processes used to make a diagnosis of COVID-19, including consideration of the variety of differential diagnoses.While SARS-CoV-2 is likely to remain on the differential diagnostic list for a plethora of presentations for the foreseeable future, clinicians should be cautious of ignoring other potential diagnoses due to availability bias. An awareness of atypical presentations allows SARS-CoV-2 to be a differential so that it can be appropriately investigated. A knowledge of infectious mimics prevents COVID-19 from overshadowing other diagnoses, hence preventing delayed diagnosis or even misdiagnosis and consequent adverse outcomes for patients.

Our aim was to determine the sensitivity of the Murex ICE enzyme immunoassay (EIA) as a screening test for early syphilis and to determine how many additional cases of infection were detected by performing additional tests when requested on clinical grounds. This was an observational study on consecutive patients diagnosed with syphilis in the Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Edinburgh between January 1st 2004 and April 1st 2005. Additional tests were performed on sera that gave a positive or equivocal EIA on screening as well as by clinical request on sera from contacts of syphilis, and those with clinical signs of syphilis. Additional tests included a Venereal Diseases Research Laboratory (VDRL) carbon antigen test, a Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) test, INNO-LIA line immunoblot assay, and an EIA specific for anti-treponemal IgM.A total of 105 patients were diagnosed with syphilis: primary (50), secondary (26), early latent (8), and of unknown duration (21). The TPPA was the most sensitive test in primary syphilis and had a sensitivity of 96% (48/50), which was significantly higher (P <0.05) than the sensitivity of 84% (42/50) for the screening EIA: seven of the EIA negatives were detected by EIA-IgM, six by TPPA, five by immunoblot, and two by VDRL. EIA-IgM was negative in six primaries; all were positive by TPPA and immunoblot. We conclude that, in order to maximize the serological detection of primary syphilis a specific EIA-IgM test and a TPPA test should be performed whenever there is a clinical suspicion of primary infection. This is particularly important when an EIA such as Murex ICE is used as a single screening test as it is less sensitive than the TPPA in primary infection.

Little is known about the prevalence of rectal chlamydial infection amongst men who have sex with men (MSM). Previous studies using culture methods reported this to be between 4-6%. The emergence of nucleic acid amplification tests has significantly increased the sensitivity and specificity for chlamydial detection, making it possible to estimate the prevalence of rectal infection more accurately. A prospective cross sectional study involving 443 MSM who were screened for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) between May 1999 and January 2002. Rectal swabs for chlamydiae were obtained in addition to specimens for routine STI screening. Rectal chlamydiae were detected by ligase chain reaction (LCR) utilizing the Abbott LCX Amplicor with confirmation by COBASE amplicor for the majority of cases. Those with rectal chlamydial infection were treated with azithromycin. The characteristics of men with rectal chlamydial infection were compared with those who were not infected at this site. Rectal chlamydia was detected in 32 (7.2%) of 443 patients. Those with rectal chlamydial infection were more likely to have rectal symptoms (12/32) or having a partner with confirmed chlamydial (2/32) or gonococcal (3/32) urethritis than those MSM without rectal chlamydial infection. They were also more likely to have a history of receptive anal sex (25/32) in the previous three months compared to those MSM without rectal chlamydial infection (263/411). The most common symptoms of patients with rectal chlamydial infection were pruritus ani and peri-anal pain. Eight (25%) of those with rectal chlamydial infection were known to be HIV seropositive. Rectal chlamydial infection is common amongst MSM and is effectively diagnosed by LCR. The test should be included in the routine STI screening offered to MSM.

During pregnancy, the absorption of antiretroviral drugs may not be optimal, therefore a prospective study was conducted to investigate the plasma levels of lopinavir in 26 HIV-infected pregnant women. Plasma lopinavir levels were examined in specimens obtained 12 h post-dose. The lopinavir level was found to be subtherapeutic in four women (15.4%); one patient who discontinued treatment and three (13.6%) with therapeutic levels of lopinavir had detectable HIV viral loads at the time of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Few studies have reported on sexually transmitted infections at the US-Mexico border, so the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in this population remains uncertain. This binational project investigated the prevalence of, and risk factors for, C. trachomatis among women along the Arizona, US-Sonora, Mexico border. Women who self-referred for routine gynaecological care were invited to complete an interviewer-administered questionnaire and to undergo a Pap smear, C. trachomatis test, and HPV test. In 2270 women, C. trachomatis prevalence overall was 8.2% as measured by hybrid capture and 2.6% by enzyme immunoassay. Infection was associated with young age, a history of new sexual partner(s) in the previous three months, HPV infection, and proximity of clinic to the international border. Antibiotic use in the previous 30 days was associated with decreased odds of infection. Women in Arizona-Sonora border communities are at increased risk for C. trachomatis infection compared to women attending clinics in non-border locations.

Short-term detectable VL may be common with using TaqMan assay. This phenomenon did not result in new mutations or failure of HAART in study patients in the short term.