The number of chemicals in commerce which have not been evaluated for potential developmental toxicity is large. Because of the time and expense required by conventional developmental toxicity tests, an abbreviated assay is needed that will preliminarily evaluate otherwise untested chemicals to help prioritize them for conventional testing. A proposed short-term in vivo assay has been used in a series of studies in which a total of 60 chemicals were tested. Some were independently tested two or four times each. In this preliminary test, pregnant mice were dosed during mid-pregnancy and were then allowed to deliver litters. Litter size, birth weight, and neonatal growth and survival to postnatal day 3 were recorded as indices of potential developmental toxicity. Results in this assay and conventional mouse teratology tests were generally concordant. Conventional data were available for 14 chemicals (ten teratogens, one fetotoxin, three nonteratogens), of which 11 (nine teratogens, one fetotoxin, one nonteratogen) produced evidence of developmental toxicity. This included conventional data for three chemicals (ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol dimethyl ether, and triethylene glycol dimethyl ether) that were untested before the present study. As high priority candidates for conventional testing on the basis of results here, all were subsequently studied in a standard teratology assay and were confirmed to be teratogenic in mice. Additionally, one of them (ethylene glycol) plus a fourth high priority candidate for conventional study (diethylene glycol monomethyl ether) were subsequently tested in rats and were found to be teratogenic in that species.
ObjectivesThe present review aimed to assess the quality, content and evidence of efficacy of universally delivered (to all pupils aged 5–16 years), school-based, mental health interventions designed to promote mental health/well-being and resilience, using a validated outcome measure and provided within the UK in order to inform UK schools-based well-being implementation.DesignA systematic review of published literature set within UK mainstream school settings.Data sourcesEmbase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsychArticles, ASSIA and Psychological and Behavioural Sciences published between 2000 and April 2016.Eligibility criteriaPublished in English; universal interventions that aimed to improve mental health/emotional well-being in a mainstream school environment; school pupils were the direct recipients of the intervention; pre-post design utilised allowing comparison using a validated outcome measure.Data extraction and synthesis12 studies were identified including RCTs and non-controlled pre-post designs (5 primary school based, 7 secondary school based). A narrative synthesis was applied with study quality check.
1
ResultsEffectiveness of school-based universal interventions was found to be neutral or small with more positive effects found for poorer quality studies and those based in primary schools (pupils aged 9–12 years). Studies varied widely in their use of measures and study design. Only four studies were rated ‘excellent’ quality. Methodological issues such as small sample size, varying course fidelity and lack of randomisation reduced overall study quality. Where there were several positive outcomes, effect sizes were small, and methodological issues rendered many results to be interpreted with caution. Overall, results suggested a trend whereby higher quality studies reported less positive effects. The only study that conducted a health economic analysis suggested the intervention was not cost-effective.ConclusionsThe current evidence suggests there are neutral to small effects of universal, school-based interventions in the UK that aim to promote emotional or mental well-being or the prevention of mental health difficulties. Robust, long-term methodologies need to be pursued ensuring adequate recording of fidelity, the use of validated measures sensitive to mechanisms of change, reporting of those lost to follow-up and any adverse effects. Further high-quality and large-scale research is required across the UK in order to robustly test any long-term benefits for pupils or on the wider educational or health system.
This article evaluates the impact of an innovative early years music project developed on the Isle of Wight, UK, which aimed to enhance the role of music-making in educational settings for three-to five-year-old children. The MusicStart Project designed an original model for training practitioners working in such settings to increase their confidence and skills in making music with their pupils. A variety of instruments were used to collect feedback and all participating practitioners (N ϭ120) were asked to complete a questionnaire following the training and a 53 percent response rate was achieved. The feedback indicated that the majority of practitioners found it useful and were inspired to put new ideas into practice. About a quarter of practitioners indicated that they were already making music with confidence and very few felt that the training had not influenced their future practice. The practitioners and MusicStart leaders identified some challenges to sustaining the levels of music-making that followed immediately after the training, most significantly: opportunities to cascade new ideas with colleagues; conflicts with other professional demands; and the time needed to enable practitioners to establish new skills and ideas.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.