BackgroundTreatment options are limited for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) following progression after first-line platinum-based therapy, particularly in Asian countries.Patients and methodsIn this randomised, open-label, phase III trial, we enrolled Asian patients aged ≥18 years, with histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent/metastatic HNSCC following first-line platinum-based therapy who were not amenable for salvage surgery or radiotherapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0/1. Patients were randomised (2 : 1) to receive oral afatinib (40 mg/day) or intravenous methotrexate (40 mg/m2/week), stratified by ECOG performance status and prior EGFR-targeted antibody therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent central review committee blinded to treatment allocation.ResultsA total of 340 patients were randomised (228 afatinib; 112 methotrexate). After a median follow-up of 6.4 months, afatinib significantly decreased the risk of progression/death by 37% versus methotrexate (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.48–0.82; P = 0.0005; median 2.9 versus 2.6 months; landmark analysis at 12 and 24 weeks, 58% versus 41%, 21% versus 9%). Improved PFS was complemented by quality of life benefits. Objective response rate was 28% with afatinib and 13% with methotrexate. There was no significant difference in overall survival. The most common grade ≥3 drug-related adverse events were rash/acne (4% with afatinib versus 0% with methotrexate), diarrhoea (4% versus 0%), fatigue (1% versus 5%), anaemia (<1% versus 5%) and leukopenia (0% versus 5%).ConclusionsConsistent with the phase III LUX-Head & Neck 1 trial, afatinib significantly improved PFS versus methotrexate, with a manageable safety profile. These results demonstrate the efficacy and feasibility of afatinib as a second-line treatment option for certain patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01856478.
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a recently described, scarcely documented clinical entity. PRES is caused by various factors, the most common being hypertension, followed by nonhypertensive causes such as renal diseases and immunosuppressive therapy. Recently, some cases have been reported about the association of increased use of cytotoxic and immunosuppressive agents in cancer patients, and relevant reports have increased with advances in radiological examinations. Here, we report a case of gallbladder cancer with liver metastasis undergoing gemcitabine- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy who presented with complaints of seizures, headache, and bilateral lower limb weakness. Thorough clinical examination, biochemical analysis, and radiological evaluation led to diagnosis of PRES. It is important to recognize this syndrome which will facilitate early diagnosis and prompt symptomatic management. Removal of causative agent is an important aspect of management. Studies are needed to identify factors of adverse prognostic significance and to develop neuroprotective strategies.
6024 Background: In a previous global phase III trial (LUX-Head & Neck 1), second-line (2L) afatinib significantly improved PFS vs methotrexate (MTX) in pts with R/M HNSCC. Here, we compared efficacy/safety of 2L afatinib vs MTX in Asian pts with R/M HNSCC. Methods: Pts progressing on/after platinum therapy were randomized (2:1) to 40 mg/day afatinib (feeding tube or oral) or 40 mg/m2/week iv MTX. Primary endpoint was PFS by independent review. Secondary endpoints were OS, ORR, and patient-reported outcomes. Results: 340 pts were randomized (afatinib 228, MTX 112). Median (range) duration of treatment (Tx) was 3.0 ( < 0.1–35.9) and 1.4 ( < 0.1–8.8) mos, respectively. Afatinib significantly decreased the risk of progression or death by 37% compared with MTX (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.82 p = 0.0005, median PFS, 2.9 vs 2.6 mos; landmark analysis at 12 and 24 wks, 58 vs 41%, 21 vs 9%). There was no significant difference in OS (HR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.68, 1.13; median 6.9 vs 6.4 mos). ORR was 28% with afatinib and 13% with MTX (OR 2.8; 95% CI: 1.5, 5.2, p = 0.016). More pts had clinically relevant improvements in global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL; 40 vs 23%, p < 0.01), swallowing (34 vs 18%, p = 0.01) and pain (34 vs 25%, p = 0.22) with afatinib vs MTX. Post-baseline change in GHS/QoL score was more favorable with afatinib (p < 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; all/grade ≥3) were reported in 89/16% and 67/23% pts with afatinib and MTX. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were rash/acne (4%), diarrhea (4%), and stomatitis (3%) with afatinib, and anemia, leukopenia, and fatigue (all 5%) with MTX. Fatal AEs were reported in 23 and 11% pts with afatinib and MTX. Two ( hypoglycemia, pneumonitis/lung infiltration) and 4 pts had fatal AEs considered related to Tx with afatinib and MTX. 11% and 17% pts discontinued Tx due to TRAEs. Conclusions: LUX-Head & Neck 3 achieved its primary endpoint. Two randomized phase III trials have now demonstrated clinical benefit with 2L afatinib vs MTX. Safety data were consistent with the known tolerability profiles of afatinib and MTX. Clinical trial information: NCT01856478.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.