Researchers in the field of chronic fatigue in tertiary care found that patients’ somatic (e.g. viral) explanations for their condition may lead to chronicity of symptoms. We studied the influence of a somatic attributional bias on outcome and reported symptoms in primary care patients with fatigue. We compared fatigue scores on a specific scale, and number of presented symptoms, in two groups of primary care patients with ‘functional’ fatigue: 75 with a high score on the somatic subscale of the Fatigue Attribution Scale (S-FAS), and 95 with a low score on the S-FAS. At the index visit, patients with low and high scores on the S-FAS were not different for age, sex, fatigue scores, and levels of depressive symptoms. Patients with high scores on the S-FAS presented significantly more somatic and psychological symptoms – a total of 36 symptoms for 24 patients (25.3%) in the low-score group, and a total of 52 symptoms for 31 patients (41.3%) in the high-score group. Forty-two days later, at the follow-up visit, the fatigue scores were similar in both groups. In primary care patients with fatigue not due to somatic illnesss or major depression, the tendency to attribute fatigue to somatic causes is not associated with a worse outcome, but with a higher number of reported symptoms.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract