Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) play a predominant role in nosocomial infections. Rapid, reliable identification of these organisms is essential for accurate diagnosis and prompt effective treatment of these infections. Quite recently, the VITEK 2 g-positive (gram-positive [GP]) identification card (bioMérieux) has been redesigned for greater accuracy in the identification of gram-positive cocci. We compared the BD Phoenix (Becton Dickinson) and VITEK 2 (bioMérieux) automated microbiology systems, using their respective update version cards, and the API ID32 STAPH test. The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap) gene-based T-RFLP (terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism) method was used for verifying the results. In total, 86 clinical isolates of CNS and 27 reference strains were analyzed. The results show that for identification of CNS, the automated identification methods using the newest VITEK 2 and BD Phoenix identification cards are comparable. However, API ID32 STAPH revealed more correct results compared to both automated microbiology systems. Despite the increased performance of the phenotypic automated identification systems compared to the former versions, molecular methods, e.g., the gap-based T-RFLP method, still show superior accuracy in identifying Staphylococcus species other than Staphylococcus aureus. So far, 40 species of the genus Staphylococcus have been identified (8).Staphylococcus aureus is the best known and has been frequently implicated in the etiology of a series of infections and intoxications in humans, whereas coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), representing the majority of the species, have been considered to be saprophytic or rarely pathogenic. Currently, several species of CNS are recognized as potential pathogens, mainly causing nosocomial infections, often involved in infections related to implanted medical devices such as intravenous catheters, prosthetic heart valves, and orthopedic implants. The species that most frequently cause diseases in humans are Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. (6,12,17,20). Other significant opportunistic pathogens include Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus warneri, Staphylococcus capitis, Staphylococcus simulans, Staphylococcus cohnii, Staphylococcus xylosus, Staphylococcus saccharolyticus, and Staphylococcus lugdunensisIn this regard, comprehensive and accurate identification of the distinct Staphylococcus species is of great importance. A variety of methods have been proposed for identification schemes based on commercial tests and in relation to the publication of Kloos and Schleifer (15). Various automated identification and susceptibility test systems are currently on the market, among them VITEK 2 (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) and the BD Phoenix system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD.). Quite recently, the VITEK 2 gram-positive (GP) identification card (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) has been redesigned for increased accuracy...

Infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-and ampC beta-lactamase-producing gramnegative bacteria complicate therapy and limit treatment options. Several different panels for ESBL detection with automated systems exist. In addition, a chromogenic agar medium is available for ESBL screening. We compared two automated identification and susceptibility testing systems with regard to their effectiveness in detecting ESBL production in Enterobacteriaceae: the BD Phoenix system (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD) and the Vitek 2 system (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). We tested 114 strains using the Etest as the standard, various available panels for both automated systems (for BD Phoenix, the NMIC/ID-50 and NMIC/ ID-70 GN Combo panels for combined identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli, and for Vitek 2, the ID-GNB panel for identification of gram-negative bacilli and the AST-N020, AST-N041, and AST-N062 panels for susceptibility testing), and a chromogenic agar medium (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). PCR for common ESBL gene families (encoding TEM, SHV, OXA, and CTX-M) and for chromosomal or plasmid-mediated ampC beta-lactamase genes was conducted to complete the study design. For the tested specimens overall, the chromID ESBL agar showed the highest sensitivity (95.8%) but the lowest specificity (10.5%) compared to the sensitivity and specificity of the Etest (chosen as reference by the authors) for the detection of ESBL-producing strains. The BD Phoenix system showed sensitivities of 77.1% and 84.2% and specificities of 61.5% and 75.0%, respectively, for the NMIC/ID-50 andNMIC/ID-70 panels. The sensitivity of the Vitek 2 system ranged from 78.8% (AST-N020) to 80.6% (AST-N062) and up to 84.2% (AST-N041). The specificities of the respective panels were 50.0% (AST-N041 and AST-N062) and 55.6% (AST-N020). In conclusion, the sensitivities and specificities of ESBL detection by the different methods differ depending on the microorganisms under study.

No abstract

Helicobacter pylori infections can be effectively treated with clarithromycin, a macrolide, in combination with other antibiotics, such as amoxicillin, tetracycline or metronidazole. The failure of H. pylori eradication is mainly associated with macrolide-resistant strains. Three point mutations (A2142G/C, A2143G, T2182C) in the peptidyltransferase region of domain V of the 23S rRNA have been described as being associated with clarithromycin resistance. Therefore, the determination of clarithromycin resistance by pyrosequencing was evaluated. H. pylori from 81 gastric biopsies was cultured and clarithromycin resistance was determined by Etest, as well as by pyrosequencing technology (PSQ 96 system; Biotage). The respective mutations were set in relation to the MIC measured in mg ml "1 by Etest. In this study, point mutations in positions 2142 and 2143 were associated with clarithromycin resistance. Mutations in position 2182 did not contribute to clarithromycin resistance. In addition, from 22 out of the 81 biopsies, clarithromycin resistance was determined directly without culturing H. pylori to save additional time. Identical results were obtained as compared to resistance testing with pure H. pylori strains. All results obtained by pyrosequencing were evaluated by Sanger sequencing. The data show that pyrosequencing to detect point mutation is a fast and reliable method for determining clarithromycin resistance in H. pylori, and provides the same results as the Etest.