Structural investigation and morphometry of meiotic chromosomes by scanning electron microscopy (in comparison to light microscopy) of all stages of condensation of meiosis I + II show remarkable differences during chromosome condensation in mitosis and meiosis I of rye (Secale cereale) with respect to initiation, mode and degree of condensation. Mitotic chromosomes condense in a linear fashion, shorten in length and increase moderately in diameter. In contrast, in meiosis I, condensation of chromosomes in length and diameter is a sigmoidal process with a retardation in zygotene and pachytene and an acceleration from diplotene to diakinesis. The basic structural components of mitotic chromosomes of rye are “parallel fibers” and “chromomeres” which become highly compacted in metaphase. Although chromosome architecture in early prophase of meiosis seems similar to mitosis in principle, there is no equivalent stage during transition to metaphase I when chromosomes condense to a much higher degree and show a characteristic “smooth” surface. No indication was found for helical winding of chromosomes either in mitosis or in meiosis. Based on measurements, we propose a mechanism for chromosome dynamics in mitosis and meiosis, which involves three individual processes: (i) aggregation of chromatin subdomains into a chromosome filament, (ii) condensation in length, which involves a progressive increase in diameter and (iii) separation of chromatids.

No abstract

No abstract

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) proves to be an appropriate technique for imaging chromatin organization in meiosis I and II of rye (Secale cereale) down to a resolution of a few nanometers. It could be shown for the first time that organization of basic structural elements (coiled and parallel fibers, chromomeres) changes dramatically during the progression to metaphase I and II. Controlled loosening with proteinase K (after fixation with glutaraldehyde) provides an enhanced insight into chromosome architecture even of highly condensed stages of meiosis. By selective staining with platinum blue, DNA content and distribution can be visualized within compact chromosomes as well as in a complex arrangement of fibers. Chromatin interconnecting threads, which are typically observed in prophase I between homologous and non-homologous chromosomes, stain clearly for DNA. In zygotene transversion of chromatid strands to their homologous counterparts becomes evident. In pachytene segments of synapsed and non-synapsed homologs alternate. At synapsed regions pairing is so intimate that homologous chromosomes form one filament of structural entity. Chiasmata are characterized by chromatid strands which traverse from one homolog to its counterpart. Bivalents are characteristically fused at their telomeric regions. In metaphase I and II there is no structural evidence for primary and secondary constrictions.

A new method is described for observing and quantifying an aspect of contact inhibition of cell movement that is sometimes called "contact paralysis". Based on the scanning acoustic microscope (SAM), the method can detect changes in the mechanical properties of cells, as well as changes in their motility and may therefore be more sensitive to some dynamic changes than methods based on optical microscopy. With this method intracellular motility of normal and transformed cells of epithelial and fibroblastic origin was investigated. By subtraction of SAM images patterns of motility, domains were detected that changed in a characteristic way among various cell lines. Wave-like and nucleating domains could be distinguished; they were also used for the quantification of motility. Like migration intracellular motility is influenced by cell-cell contacts. In zones where a cell touches its neighbours motility domains change or disappear depending on the cell type. In immortalized epithelial cells (XTH-2 cells) large quiescent zones developed in the region where contact with neighbouring cells was established, whereas in fibroblastic (3T3) cells motility was reduced less and did not change in domain pattern. Epithelial and fibroblastic cells were less motile when in contact with other cells or in confluent cultures than when solitary, i.e. their motility was contact inhibited. Transformed (SV40 3T3) cells, however, did not reduce their motility when in contact to or enclosed by other cells. The molecular basis for motility domains remains to be investigated.