Zur deskriptiven Syntax der QuantitätsangabenWir werden uns vor allem mit den folgenden Quantitätsangaben befassen: Die Abfolge "definiter Artikel (oder Demonstrativdeterminans) vor Quantitätsangabe" ist nur bei bestimmten Quantitätsangaben möglich. Und zwar bei sämtlich-, ganz-, gesamt-, zahllos-, unzählig-, viel-, zahlreich-, wenig-, beid-, einund Nominalphrasen mit initialen Quantitätsangaben können schlecht rechtsversetzt werden (vgl. Altmann 1981: 227, Vater 1984.(11) a. Ich habe es gefunden, das (/dieses, mein) Buch, b.Ich habe sie gefunden, die (/diese, meine) Bücher.
In sieben Kapiteln werden folgende weitere Gebiete der germanistischen Linguistik behandelt: Methoden des empirischen Arbeitens, Psycholinguistik, Zweitspracherwerb, Gebärdensprache, Variationslinguistik (Dialektologie und Soziolinguistik), Textund Gesprächslinguistik sowie Linguistik und Literatur.Bibliografische Information Der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über
Sentences containing quantifiers are often ambiguous, as quantificational DPs interact with one another, and with wh ‐phrases, negation, and adverbials. This kind of ambiguity is an ambiguity with respect to the scope of the quantifiers. However, sentences containing several quantifiers or operators are not always scope ambiguous: compare, for example, the ambiguous Some of us always showed up with the unequivocal Always, some of us showed up . Thus, the scope of quantifiers is not essentially free; there is a complex pattern of ambiguous and unequivocal sentences containing quantifiers and operators. An adequate analysis of scope ambiguities should be able to predict this complex pattern in a principled way, which should encompass a sensible view of the interface between syntax and semantics. According to the dominant view in generative grammar, scope relations can be deduced from the c‐command relations on Logical Form, where quantifiers are assigned scope by quantifier raising. Variants of and alternatives to this dominant view have been proposed, for some partly motivated by the scope facts in languages other than English (in particular, Mandarin Chinese and Hungarian have been taken into consideration), and for some partly motivated by a more thorough look at the (English) data and/or by modification or substitution of the basic framework. It became apparent that quantifier scope relations crucially depend on certain properties of the quantifiers, whose exact nature is not yet settled, however. The interplay of these properties seems to determine the complex pattern of ambiguous and unequivocal sentences containing quantifiers and operators. The challenge is to uncover the nature of these scope‐relevant properties and account for their interplay within a general conception of the interface between syntax and semantics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.