A Pilot Studyany physiologic alterations observed during pregnancy result from a combination of hormonal and mechanical factors that may cause changes to the pelvic floor 1,2 ; these changes contribute to pelvic floor dysfunction irrespective of the type of delivery. 3,4 The physical changes during twin pregnancy are more pronounced, with greater compression of the abdominal organs and higher elevation of the diaphragm than in singleton pregnancy. 5 Nevertheless, few studies have evaluated how twin pregnancy affects the pelvic floor. Studies by Goldberg et al, 6 Legendre et al, 7 and Cuerva González et al 8 revealed higher rates of stress urinary incontinence after twin deliveries; however, to our knowledge, no studies have directly evaluated the pelvic floor during pregnancy. Kubotani, MD, Edward Araujo Júnior, MD, PhD, Miriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti, PhD, Jurandir Piassi Passos, MD, Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jármy Di Bella, PhD, Julio Elito Júnior, PhD Received August 12, 2013, Objectives-The purpose of this study was to compare the morphologic characteristics of the pelvic floor musculature between women with twin and singleton pregnancies.
Juliana SayuriMethods-We conducted a cross-sectional case-control study of 40 nulliparous women aged 20 to 38 years to compare women with singleton pregnancies (n = 23) to women with twin pregnancies (n = 17). Biometric measurements of the levator hiatus and the sagittal and coronal diameters were made by transperineal 3-dimensional sonography between the 28th and 38th gestational weeks. Comparisons were statistically assessed by the unpaired Student t test and Mann-Whitney U test.Results-For the women with singleton pregnancies, the mean sagittal diameters at rest, during the Valsalva maneuver, and during pelvic floor contraction were 5.3, 5.7, and 4.5 cm, respectively, and the mean coronal diameters under these conditions were 3.8, 4.1, and 3.6 cm. For the women with twin pregnancies, the corresponding values were as follows: mean sagittal diameters, 5.3, 5.8, and 4.6 cm; and mean coronal diameters, 4.3, 4.3, and 3.8 cm. The differences in coronal diameters were statistically significant at rest (P < .01) and during contraction (P = .04). The mean levator hiatal areas for the women with singleton pregnancies were 14.6, 16.9, and 11.7 cm 2 at rest, during Valsalva, and during contraction, respectively; for the women with twin pregnancies, these values were 16.0, 18.6, and 12.6 cm 2 .Conclusions-Hiatal measurements were higher in twin than in singleton pregnancies, with coronal diameters reaching significance at rest and during contraction, suggesting that pelvic support undergoes greater changes during twin pregnancy.